Studies comparing aggressive hydration with lactate Ringer: intra-procedural risk factors

Author (country, year) [ref]Difficult cannulationPancreatic duct cannulationPancreatic duct injectionPrecutPancreatic sphincterotomyBalloon dilation papillaTrainee involved
Buxbaum et al. (USA, 2014) [30]> 10 attemps
13% LR
10% SH		NA25.6% LR
17.4% SH		2.6% LR
4.3% SH		0% LR
0% SH		0% LR
0% SH		Yes
Shaygan-Nejad et al. (Iran, 2015) [32]NANANANANA86.7% LR
90.7% SH
(p = 0.440)		NA
Choi et al. (Korea, 2017) [31]20.0% LR
17.6% SH		NA2.4% LR
3.9% SH		8.2% LR
5.5% SH		3.5% LR
3.1% SH		8.6% LR
9.4% SH		None
Park et al. (Korea, 2018) [34]34.1% aggressive LR
36.6% aggressive NSS
27.9% SH LR		NA15.9% aggressive LR
12.7% aggressive NSS
17.8% SH LR		33.3% aggressive LR
36.6% aggressive NSS
31.8% SH LR		NA6.1% aggressive LR
6.0% aggressive NSS
3.1% SH LR		None
Masjedizadeh et al. (Iran, 2017) [36]NANANANANANANA
Ghaderi et al. (Iran, 2019) [33]NANA20% LR
18.3% SH		NANA98.8% LR
78% SH		NA
Guha et al. (India, 2023) [37]NA15.2% LR
17.8% indomethacin		NA26.4% LR
32.8% indomethacin		NA8.4% LR
3.4% indomethacin		Yes
Chang et al. (Thailand, 2022) [35]24% LR
30% SH		40% LR
38% SH		5% LR
8% SH		6% LR
9% SH		3% LR
2% SH		16% LR
12% SH		Yes

LR: lactated Ringer’s; NA: not available; NSS: normal saline solution; SH: standard hydration