Indexes that evaluate FC based on signal synchronization and coupling
Connectivity index
Description
Coherence (Coh)
A measure of the covariance of the frequency components of two signals. In EEG studies, COh typically corresponds to the covariance of spectral activity between two electrode locations.
Imaginary part of coherency (iCOh)
Coherency is the imaginary part of the Fourier-transformed coherency and measures the linear relationship between two EEG signals at a specific frequency. It shows how the phases of signals in channels i and j are linked, assuming the signals are stable over time.
Phase locking value (PLV)
PLV measures how consistent the phase differences are between two brain regions. When PLV is close to 1, it means the regions are highly synchronized. If PLV is close to zero, it indicates large variability in phase differences.
Phase lag index (PLI)
PLI measures the asymmetry in the phase difference between two EEG signals. It shows how consistently one signal leads or lags behind the other.
Synchronization likelihood (SL)
This measure calculates the likelihood that two signals are in the same “dynamical state”. These states are defined by the time-delay embedded vectors of the signals.
Phase amplitude coupling (PAC)
This measure examines the relationship between the phase of a low-frequency oscillation and the amplitude of a higher-frequency oscillation, either within the same brain region or between different regions (e.g., the low-frequency phase in region A influencing the high-frequency amplitude in region B).
Amplitude envelope correlation (AEC)
AEC measures the correlation between the amplitude envelopes of two signals at each frequency. It uses Pearson’s r to compare the log-transformed power envelopes of the signals.
EEG: electroencephalography
Declarations
Author contributions
PVNNR: Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. MSTM: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—review & editing, Supervision. Both authors read and approved the submitted version.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Salthouse TA. Selective review of cognitive aging.J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010;16:754–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Salthouse TA. The aging of working memory.Neuropsychology. 1994;8:535–43.
Hausman HK, O’Shea A, Kraft JN, Boutzoukas EM, Evangelista ND, Van Etten EJ, et al. The Role of Resting-State Network Functional Connectivity in Cognitive Aging.Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:177. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Buckner RL. Memory and executive function in aging and AD: multiple factors that cause decline and reserve factors that compensate.Neuron. 2004;44:195–208. [DOI] [PubMed]
Wecker NS, Kramer JH, Hallam BJ, Delis DC. Mental flexibility: age effects on switching.Neuropsychology. 2005;19:345–52. [DOI] [PubMed]
Salat DH, Kaye JA, Janowsky JS. Prefrontal gray and white matter volumes in healthy aging and Alzheimer disease.Arch Neurol. 1999;56:338–44. [DOI] [PubMed]
Raz N, Lindenberger U, Rodrigue KM, Kennedy KM, Head D, Williamson A, et al. Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers.Cereb Cortex. 2005;15:1676–89. [DOI] [PubMed]
Andrews-Hanna JR, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Lustig C, Head D, Raichle ME, et al. Disruption of large-scale brain systems in advanced aging.Neuron. 2007;56:924–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Farras-Permanyer L, Mancho-Fora N, Montalà-Flaquer M, Bartrés-Faz D, Vaqué-Alcázar L, Peró-Cebollero M, et al. Age-related changes in resting-state functional connectivity in older adults.Neural Regen Res. 2019;14:1544–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Czoch A, Kaposzta Z, Mukli P, Stylianou O, Eke A, Racz FS. Resting-state fractal brain connectivity is associated with impaired cognitive performance in healthy aging.Geroscience. 2024;46:473–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Onoda K, Ishihara M, Yamaguchi S. Decreased functional connectivity by aging is associated with cognitive decline.J Cogn Neurosci. 2012;24:2186–98. [DOI] [PubMed]
Lin Q, Rosenberg MD, Yoo K, Hsu TW, O’Connell TP, Chun MM. Resting-State Functional Connectivity Predicts Cognitive Impairment Related to Alzheimer’s Disease.Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:94. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Huang CC, Hsieh WJ, Lee PL, Peng LN, Liu LK, Lee WJ, et al. Age-related changes in resting-state networks of a large sample size of healthy elderly.CNS Neurosci Ther. 2015;21:817–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
World population prospects 2019: highlights. New York: United Nations; 2019.
Mancho-Fora N, Montalà-Flaquer M, Farràs-Permanyer L, Zarabozo-Hurtado D, Gallardo-Moreno GB, Gudayol-Farré E, et al. Network change point detection in resting-state functional connectivity dynamics of mild cognitive impairment patients.Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2020;20:200–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome.Arch Neurol. 1999;56:303–8. [DOI] [PubMed]
Farràs-Permanyer L, Guàrdia-Olmos J, Peró-Cebollero M. Mild cognitive impairment and fMRI studies of brain functional connectivity: the state of the art.Front Psychol. 2015;6:1095. [DOI]
Hafkemeijer A, van der Grond J, Rombouts SA. Imaging the default mode network in aging and dementia.Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822:431–41. [DOI] [PubMed]
Sullivan MD, Anderson JAE, Turner GR, Spreng RN; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Intrinsic neurocognitive network connectivity differences between normal aging and mild cognitive impairment are associated with cognitive status and age.Neurobiol Aging. 2019;73:219–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Zhao T, Sheng C, Bi Q, Niu W, Shu N, Han Y. Age-related differences in the topological efficiency of the brain structural connectome in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.Neurobiol Aging. 2017;59:144–55. [DOI] [PubMed]
Nezhadmoghadam F, Martinez-Torteya A, Treviño V, Martínez E, Santos A, Tamez-Peña J, et al. Robust Discovery of Mild Cognitive impairment subtypes and their Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease conversion using unsupervised machine learning and Gaussian Mixture Modeling.Curr Alzheimer Res. 2021;18:595–606. [DOI]
Li H, Gao S, Jia X, Jiang T, Li K. Distinctive Alterations of Functional Connectivity Strength between Vascular and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.Neural Plast. 2021;2021:8812490. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Zhao C, Huang WJ, Feng F, Zhou B, Yao HX, Guo YE, et al. Abnormal characterization of dynamic functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease.Neural Regen Res. 2022;17:2014–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Binnewijzend MA, Schoonheim MM, Sanz-Arigita E, Wink AM, van der Flier WM, Tolboom N, et al. Resting-state fMRI changes in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment.Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33:2018–28. [DOI] [PubMed]
Stampanoni Bassi M, Iezzi E, Gilio L, Centonze D, Buttari F. Synaptic Plasticity Shapes Brain Connectivity: Implications for Network Topology.Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:6193. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Li Y, Han H, Shi K, Cui D, Yang J, Alberts IL, et al. The Mechanism of Downregulated Interstitial Fluid Drainage Following Neuronal Excitation.Aging Dis. 2020;11:1407–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Graff BJ, Harrison SL, Payne SJ, El-Bouri WK. Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Changes in Healthy Ageing and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Narrative Review.Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023;52:11–20. [DOI] [PubMed]
Toth P, Tarantini S, Csiszar A, Ungvari Z. Functional vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: mechanisms and consequences of cerebral autoregulatory dysfunction, endothelial impairment, and neurovascular uncoupling in aging.Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017;312:H1–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
You TY, Dong Q, Cui M. Emerging Links between Cerebral Blood Flow Regulation and Cognitive Decline: A Role for Brain Microvascular Pericytes.Aging Dis. 2023;14:1276–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Schulz M, Malherbe C, Cheng B, Thomalla G, Schlemm E. Functional connectivity changes in cerebral small vessel disease - a systematic review of the resting-state MRI literature.BMC Med. 2021;19:103. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Dautricourt S, Gonneaud J, Landeau B, Calhoun VD, de Flores R, Poisnel G, et al.; Medit-Ageing Research Group. Dynamic functional connectivity patterns associated with dementia risk.Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022;14:72. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Gonneaud J, Baria AT, Pichet Binette A, Gordon BA, Chhatwal JP, Cruchaga C, et al.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI); Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) Study Group; Pre-symptomatic Evaluation of Experimental or Novel Treatments for Alzheimer’s Disease (PREVENT-AD) Research Group. Accelerated functional brain aging in pre-clinical familial Alzheimer’s disease.Nat Commun. 2021;12:5346. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Esposito R, Cieri F, Chiacchiaretta P, Cera N, Lauriola M, Di Giannantonio M, et al. Modifications in resting state functional anticorrelation between default mode network and dorsal attention network: comparison among young adults, healthy elders and mild cognitive impairment patients.Brain Imaging Behav. 2018;12:127–41. [DOI] [PubMed]
Blum L, Hofmann A, Rosenbaum D, Elshehabi M, Suenkel U, Fallgatter AJ, et al. Effects of aging on functional connectivity in a neurodegenerative risk cohort: resting state versus task measurement using near-infrared spectroscopy.Sci Rep. 2022;12:11262. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1124:1–38. [DOI] [PubMed]
Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, Sabuncu MR, Lashkari D, Hollinshead M, et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity.J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:1125–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Weintraub S, Dikmen SS, Heaton RK, Tulsky DS, Zelazo PD, Bauer PJ, et al. Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox.Neurology. 2013;80:S54–64. [DOI]
Oren N, Ash EL, Shapira-Lichter I, Elkana O, Reichman-Eisikovits O, Chomsky L, et al. Changes in Resting-State Functional Connectivity of the Hippocampus Following Cognitive Effort Predict Memory Decline at Older Age-A Longitudinal fMRI Study.Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:163. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Liu T, Wang L, Suo D, Zhang J, Wang K, Wang J, et al. Resting-State Functional MRI of Healthy Adults: Temporal Dynamic Brain Coactivation Patterns.Radiology. 2022;304:624–32. [DOI] [PubMed]
Holodny AI. Resting-State Functional MRI Changes in Normal Human Aging.Radiology. 2022;304:633–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Deery HA, Di Paolo R, Moran C, Egan GF, Jamadar SD. The older adult brain is less modular, more integrated, and less efficient at rest: A systematic review of large-scale resting-state functional brain networks in aging.Psychophysiology. 2023;60:e14159. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Sun H, Vachha B, Laino ME, Jenabi M, Flynn JR, Zhang Z, et al. Decreased Hand Motor Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Patients with Glioma: Analysis of Factors including Neurovascular Uncoupling.Radiology. 2020;294:610–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Chen CM, Hou BL, Holodny AI. Effect of age and tumor grade on BOLD functional MR imaging in preoperative assessment of patients with glioma.Radiology. 2008;248:971–8. [DOI] [PubMed]
Mallela AN, Peck KK, Petrovich-Brennan NM, Zhang Z, Lou W, Holodny AI. Altered Resting-State Functional Connectivity in the Hand Motor Network in Glioma Patients.Brain Connect. 2016;6:587–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Voss HU, Peck KK, Petrovich Brennan NM, Pogosbekyan EL, Zakharova NE, Batalov AI, et al. A vascular-task response dependency and its application in functional imaging of brain tumors.J Neurosci Methods. 2019;322:10–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Goto M, Abe O, Miyati T, Yamasue H, Gomi T, Takeda T. Head Motion and Correction Methods in Resting-state Functional MRI.Magn Reson Med Sci. 2016;15:178–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Specht K. Current Challenges in Translational and Clinical fMRI and Future Directions.Front Psychiatry. 2020;10:924. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Dunlop BW, Rajendra JK, Craighead WE, Kelley ME, McGrath CL, Choi KS, et al. Functional Connectivity of the Subcallosal Cingulate Cortex And Differential Outcomes to Treatment With Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy or Antidepressant Medication for Major Depressive Disorder.Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174:533–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Raine A, Yang Y. Neural foundations to moral reasoning and antisocial behavior.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2006;1:203–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Babiloni C, Blinowska K, Bonanni L, Cichocki A, De Haan W, Del Percio C, et al. What electrophysiology tells us about Alzheimer’s disease: a window into the synchronization and connectivity of brain neurons.Neurobiol Aging. 2020;85:58–73. [DOI] [PubMed]
Buzi G, Fornari C, Perinelli A, Mazza V. Functional connectivity changes in mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis of M/EEG studies.Clin Neurophysiol. 2023;156:183–95. [DOI] [PubMed]
Babiloni C, Lizio R, Del Percio C, Marzano N, Soricelli A, Salvatore E, et al. Cortical sources of resting state EEG rhythms are sensitive to the progression of early stage Alzheimer’s disease.J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;34:1015–35. [DOI] [PubMed]
Dauwels J, Vialatte F. Topics in Brain Signal Processing. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (IEEE J-STSP), ISSN1941-0484. 2010.
Musaeus CS, Nielsen MS, Høgh P. Microstates as Disease and Progression Markers in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment.Front Neurosci. 2019;13:563. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Rodinskaia D, Radinski C, Labuhn J. EEG coherence as a marker of functional connectivity disruption in Alzheimer’s disease.Aging Health Res. 2022;2:100098. [DOI]
Echeverri-Ocampo I, Ardila K, Molina-Mateo J, Padilla-Buritica JI, Carceller H, Barceló-Martinez EA, et al. EEG-Based Functional Connectivity Analysis for Cognitive Impairment Classification.Electronics. 2023;12:4432. [DOI]
Park HK, Choi SH, Kim S, Park U, Kang SW, Jeong JH, et al. Functional brain changes using electroencephalography after a 24-week multidomain intervention program to prevent dementia.Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:892590. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Lloyd R, Goulding R, Filan P, Boylan G. Overcoming the practical challenges of electroencephalography for very preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.Acta Paediatr. 2015;104:152–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Gredebäck G, Kaduk K, Bakker M, Gottwald J, Ekberg T, Elsner C, et al. The neuropsychology of infants’ pro-social preferences.Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2015;12:106–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Lehtonen J, Valkonen-Korhonen M, Georgiadis S, Tarvainen MP, Lappi H, Niskanen JP, et al. Nutritive sucking induces age-specific EEG-changes in 0-24 week-old infants.Infant Behav Dev. 2016;45:98–108. [DOI] [PubMed]
Partanen E, Mårtensson G, Hugoson P, Huotilainen M, Fellman V, Ådén U. Auditory Processing of the Brain Is Enhanced by Parental Singing for Preterm Infants.Front Neurosci. 2022;16:772008. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Hervé E, Mento G, Desnous B, François C. Challenges and new perspectives of developmental cognitive EEG studies.Neuroimage. 2022;260:119508. [DOI] [PubMed]
Wens V. Exploring the limits of MEG spatial resolution with multipolar expansions.Neuroimage. 2023;270:119953. [DOI] [PubMed]
Garcia-Ramos C, Lin JJ, Kellermann TS, Bonilha L, Prabhakaran V, Hermann BP. Graph theory and cognition: A complementary avenue for examining neuropsychological status in epilepsy.Epilepsy Behav. 2016;64:329–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Kellermann TS, Bonilha L, Eskandari R, Garcia-Ramos C, Lin JJ, Hermann BP. Mapping the neuropsychological profile of temporal lobe epilepsy using cognitive network topology and graph theory.Epilepsy Behav. 2016;63:9–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Wright LM, De Marco M, Venneri A. A Graph Theory Approach to Clarifying Aging and Disease Related Changes in Cognitive Networks.Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:676618. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Tosi G, Borsani C, Castiglioni S, Daini R, Franceschi M, Romano D. Complexity in neuropsychological assessments of cognitive impairment: A network analysis approach.Cortex. 2020;124:85–96. [DOI] [PubMed]
Ferguson C; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. A network psychometric approach to neurocognition in early Alzheimer’s disease.Cortex. 2021;137:61–73. [DOI] [PubMed]
Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, Fagan AM, Goate A, Fox NC, et al.; Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease.N Engl J Med. 2012;367:795–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Pereira JB. Detecting early changes in Alzheimer’s disease with graph theory.Brain Commun. 2020;2:fcaa129. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Vermunt L, Dicks E, Wang G, Dincer A, Flores S, Keefe SJ, et al.; Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN). Single-subject grey matter network trajectories over the disease course of autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease.Brain Commun. 2020;2:fcaa102. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Palmqvist S, Schöll M, Strandberg O, Mattsson N, Stomrud E, Zetterberg H, et al. Earliest accumulation of β-amyloid occurs within the default-mode network and concurrently affects brain connectivity.Nat Commun. 2017;8:1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Stumme J, Jockwitz C, Hoffstaedter F, Amunts K, Caspers S. Functional network reorganization in older adults: Graph-theoretical analyses of age, cognition and sex.Neuroimage. 2020;214:116756. [DOI] [PubMed]
Drakesmith M, Caeyenberghs K, Dutt A, Lewis G, David AS, Jones DK. Overcoming the effects of false positives and threshold bias in graph theoretical analyses of neuroimaging data.Neuroimage. 2015;118:313–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Hallquist MN, Hillary FG. Graph theory approaches to functional network organization in brain disorders: A critique for a brave new small-world.Netw Neurosci. 2018;3:1–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]