Summary of evidence for most promising methylation biomarkers for diagnosis of CRC in stool (sensitivity > 75%)
Biomarker gene(s) | Test | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
APC, ATM, hMLH1, HLTF, MGMT, SFRP2 | CRC | 75 | 90 | [84] |
COL4A2, TLX2 | CRC | 91 | 98 | [80] |
FBN1, SNCA | CRC | 84 | 93 | [85] |
GATA5 | CRC | 84 | 83 | [86] |
GDNF, SNAP91, NDRG4 | CRC | 86 | 96 | [28] |
HPP1 | CRC | 100 | 71 | [87] |
HPP1, MGMT, SFRP2 | Adenoma | 94 | 77 | [87] |
ITGA4, SFMBT2, THBD, ZNF304 | CRC | 96 | 87 | [88] |
KCNJ12, VAV3-AS1, EVC | CRC | 83 | 71 | [88] |
NDRG4 | CRC | 76–98 | 89 | [82, 83, 86] |
NDRG4, BMP3 | CRC | 98 | 90 | [89] |
NDRG4, BMP3, mutation KRAS, hemoglobin | CRC | 92–98 | 87–90 | [89, 90] |
Adenoma | 82 | 93 | [54] | |
NEUROD1, FAM72C | CRC | 83 | 77 | [88] |
MLH1, VIM, MGMT | CRC | 75 | 86.5 | [91] |
RARB2, p16INK4a, MGMT, APC | CRC | 75 | / | [24] |
SDC2 | CRC | 90 | 89 | [51] |
SFRP2 | Adenoma | 76–87 | 55–100 | [9, 52] |
SFRP2, TFPI2, NDRG4, BMP3 | CRC | 94 | 55 | [52] |
SEPT9 | Adenoma | 83 | 92 | [92] |
VIM, NDRG4, BMP3, TFPI2 | CRC | 89 | 90 | [76] |
SFRP1 | CRC | 89 | 86 | [93] |
VIM | CRC | 38–81 | 82–95 | [94] |
Adenoma | 33–83 | 93–100 | [95] | |
SFRP2, GATA4/5, NDRG4, VIM | CRC | 96 | 65 | [96] |
TFPI2 | Adenoma | 81 | 94 | [97] |
CRC | 76–93 | 89–100 | [97, 98] |
ATM: ATM serine/threonine kinase; hMLH1: homo sapiens DNA mismatch repair; HLTF: helicase like transcription factor; GATA5: GATA binding protein 5; HPP1: hyperpigmentation progressive 1; SFMBT2: Scm like with four mbt domains 2; THBD: thrombomodulin; VAV3-AS1: VAV3 antisense RNA 1; EVC: EvC ciliary complex subunit 1; NEUROD1: neuronal differentiation 1; FAM72C: family with sequence similarity 72 member C; MLH1: MutL homolog 1
JY: Data curation, Writing—original draft. JZ and WD: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—review & editing. All authors revised the manuscript and approved the final version of it.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81974313]; Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2019M651930]; the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Commission of Health [M2020065]; the Science and Technology Program of Nantong [JC22022040]; Nantong Commission of Health Research Fund Project [MA2021004]; Jiangsu Provincial Research Hospital [YJXYY202204]; and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Key Discipline [ZDXK202240]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
© The Author(s) 2024.