Selected phase III trials
Trial | Number of patients/characteristics | Intervention | Histologies (SCC/adeno) | Results | Main conclusion of the study |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRT followed by surgery vs. definitive RT | |||||
NCT00002550, 2009 [10] | N = 429 pts Stage IIIA (T1–3, pN2) Stage IIIB excluded | Arm 1: CRT and surgery Arm 2: CRT and definitive RT CT (cis-etoposide) | 30%/38% | 5-year PFS 22.4% (arm 1) vs. 11.1% mOS 23.6 months (arm 1) vs. 22.2 months, HR: 0.87, NS | No significant survival advantage of surgery compared to RT-CT |
Induction CT, RT-CT followed by surgery vs. RT-CT | |||||
ESPATUE, 2015 [11] | N = 161 pts, potentially resectable Stage IIIA (34%) Stage IIIB (65%) TNM 6th | Induction CT (×3 cis-paclitaxel) followed by CRT (cis-vinorelbin) and if resectable: CRT vs. surgery (arm1/2) | 39%/47% | No difference in 5-year OS or PFS | No significant survival advantage of adding surgery to CT and RT-CT, but underpowered trial |
CT before and after RT | |||||
PROCLAIM, 2016 [16] | N = 598 pts, unresectable Stage IIIA (47%) Stage IIIB (52%) TNM 6th | Arm 1: CT (cis-pem) ×3 + TRT followed by pem ×4 Arm 2: CT (cis-etoposide) ×2 + TRT followed by platinum-based CT | -/75% | No difference in OS | Cis-etoposide or cis-pem can be considered with concomitant RT for adenocarcinoma |
Adjuvant immunotherapy post-RT-CT | |||||
PACIFIC, 2022 [17, 18] | N = 713 pts, unresectable Stage IIIA (53%) Stage IIIB (44%) | Durvalumab vs. placebo after ≥ 2 cycles of CRT without progression, for 12 months | 46%/54% | 5-year OS 42.9% for durvalumab vs. 33.4%, HR: 0.72 5-year PFS 33.1% vs. 19%, HR: 0.55 | Significant improvement in OS/PFS with durvalumab post CRT |
Adjuvant immunotherapy | |||||
IMpower010, 2023 [26] | N = 1,005 pts, completely resected Stage II (52%) Stage IIIA (48%) PD-L1 ≥ 50% (23%) TNM 7th Adjuvant platinum-based CT | Adjuvant: atezolizumab for 1 year vs. BSC | 40%/48% | mOS not estimable in ITT population, but trend shown in PD-L1 ≥ 50%, HR: 0.43 | Significant improvement in DFS with atezolizumab post-surgery, regardless of PD-L1 status |
PEARLS/Keynote-091, 2022 [25] | N = 1178 pts, completely resected Stade IB (14%), stage II (57%), stage IIIA (29%) TNM 7th PD-L1 TPS < 1% (39%), 1–49% (32%), ≥ 50% (28%) Adjuvant CT mandatory for stage II/IIIA | Adjuvant: pembrolizumab vs. placebo for 1 year | 35%/64% | mDFS 53.6 months for pembrolizumab group vs. 42 months, HR: 0.76 mOS not reached in either group | Improvement of DFS with adjuvant pembrolizumab regardless of PD-L1 expression No requirement for EGFR/ALK testing (limitation) |
Adjuvant targeted therapies | |||||
ADAURA, 2023 [41, 42] | N = 682 pts, completely resected, EGFR positive Stage IB (32%), II (34%), IIIA (35%) Adjuvant CT recommended for stage II–IIIA | Osimertinib adjuvant for 3 years vs. placebo | -/97% | 5-year OS 88% in the osimertimib group vs. 78%, HR: 0.49 | Adjuvant osimertinib improves DFS and OS compared to placebo, in resected EGFR mutated NSCLC |
ALINA, 2023 [44] | N = 257 pts, completely resected, ALK positive Stage IB–IIIA | Alectinib adjuvant for 2 years vs. CT | NA | mDFS: NR vs. 44.4 months in stage II–IIIA, HR: 0.24 | Adjuvant alectinib improves DFS compared to adjuvant platinum-based CT, in resected EGFR mutated NSCLC |
Neo-adjuvant CT-immunotherapy | |||||
CheckMate-816, 2022 [30] | N = 773 pts, resectable Stage IB or II (35%) Stage IIIA (64%) TNM 7th PD-L1 < 1% (43%), 1–49% (27%), ≥ 50% (22%) | Platinum-based CT +/– nivolumab ×3, followed by surgery | 50%/49% | mEFS 31.6 months in nivolumab group vs. 20.8 months, HR: 0.63 pCR: 24% in the nivolumab group vs. 2.2% | Significant improvement in EFS and pCR with neoadjuvant CT + nivolumab No higher incidence/greater severity of AE with nivolumab |
Perioperative CT-immunotherapy | |||||
Keynote-671, 2023 [32, 33] | N = 797 pts, resectable Stage II–IIIB | Cis-based CT + pembrolizumab vs. placebo for 4 neoadjuvant cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant pembrolizumab vs. placebo for 1 year | NA | 36-months EFS 54.3% in the pembrolizumab group vs. 35.4% 36-months OS 71.3% vs. 64%, HR 0.72. pCR 18.1% vs. 4% | Perioperative pembrolizumab improves OS, EFS and pathological response |
CheckMate-77T, 2023 [31] | N = 461 pts, resectable Stage II–IIIB | Platinum-based CT + nivolumab vs. placebo for 4 neoadjuvant cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant nivolumab vs. placebo for 1 year | 51%/49% | mEFS NR vs. 18.4 months, HR: 0.58 pCR 25.3% vs. 4.7% MPR 35.4% vs. 12.1% | Perioperative immunotherapy improves EFS and pathological response |
AEGEAN, 2023 [34, 35] | N = 802 pts, resectable Stage II–IIIB | Platinum-based CT + durvalumab vs. placebo for 4 neoadjuvant cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant durvalumab vs. placebo for 1 year | 46.2%/53% | mEFS in mITT: NR vs. 25.9 months. HR: 0.68 pCR: 17.2% vs. 4.3%. Difference in pCR: 13.0% | Perioperative immunotherapy improves EFS and pathological response |
NEOTORCH, 2023 [36] | N = 404 pts, resectable Stage III | Platinum-based CT + toripalimab or placebo for 3 neoadjuvant cycles Followed by surgery and platinum-based CT + toripalimab or placebo for 1 adjuvant cycles Followed by toripalimab vs. placebo) for 12 adjuvant cycles | 77%/32% | mEFS: NR vs. 15.1 months. HR: 0.40 MPR 48.5% vs. 8.4% | Perioperative immunotherapy improves EFS and pathological response |
CRT: chemo-RT; CT: chemotherapy; Adeno: adenocarcinoma; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma; AE: adverse event; BSC: best supportive care; Cis: cisplatin; EFS: event-free survival; HR: hazard ratio; NS: not significative; nSCC: non-squamous cell carcinoma; OS: overall survival; pCR: pathological complete response; Pem: pemetrexed; PFS: progression-free survival; pts: patients; TRT: thoracic radiation therapy; DFS: disease-free survival; MPR: major pathological response; PD-L1: programmed cell death ligand-1; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; ALK: anaplastic lymphoma kinase; mDFS: median disease-free survival; pN2: pathologic N2 stage; mOS: median overall survival; mEFS: median event-free survival; NR: not reported; ITT: intention to treat; mITT: modified intention to treat; TPS: tissue proportion score; NA: not available; + or –: with or without