Immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC
Treatment | Study name | Setting | Drugs | Phase | Efficacy | AEs | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IO monotherapy | KEYNOTE-001 | Pretreated | Pembrolizumab | I | ORR 50%, mPFS of 157.5 days in four EGFR-TKI-naive patients; ORR 4%, mPFS 56 days in EGFR-TKI treated patients. | No report for EGFR patients. | [34] |
NCT02879994 | 1st | Pembrolizumab | II | ORR 0%. | TRAE: 46%, no grade 4–5 (38%). 6/7 patients had a TRAE on second-line EGFR-TKI. | [35] | |
Checkmate012 | 2nd | Nivolumab | I | ORR: 14% vs. 30%; mPFS: 1.8 months vs. 8.8 months. | Grade 3–4 in 14 (37%), no G5, in the ITT population. | [36] | |
WJOG8515L | 2nd | Nivolumab vs. Cb + pemetrexed | II | Nivolumab/Cb + pemetrexed, ORR 9.6% vs. 36.0%, mPFS 1.7 months vs. 5.6 months. | Serious AEs: 25.5% in nivolumab and 16.0% in chemotherapy. | [39] | |
BIRCH | 1st to 3rd | Atezolizumab | II | ORRs for mutant/wild-type in cohorts 1, 2, and 3 were 23%/19%, 0%/21%, and 7%/18%, respectively. | Grade 3 to 4 AEs occurred in 42% of patients (12% treatment-related). | [40] | |
ATRANTIC | Less than 3rd | Durvalumab | II | ORR was 12%. | Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 5%. | [41] | |
Dual-IO | NCT03091491 | 2nd | Nivolumab vs. nivolumab + ipillimumab | I | ORR 3.2%, PFS 1.22 months in overall cohort. | 2/31 of grade 3 TRAE in the overall cohort | [43] |
KEYNOTE 021 | Less than 2nd | Pembrolizumab plus ipilimumab | I/II | One of the 12 patients showed an objective response. | - | [44] |
IO: immune-oncology; ORR: objective response rate; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; TKIs: tyrosine kinase inhibitors; TRAE: treatment related adverse event; mPFS: median progression free survival; ITT: intent-to-treat; AEs: adverse events; ALK: anaplastic lymphoma kinase. -: no data
KA, TS, AI, TH, YG, NH, and MK: Writing—review & editing. KI: Writing—review & editing, Supervision. YO: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing—review & editing. All authors read and approved the submitted version.
YO reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharma, Amgen, and Novartis, and personal fees from Taiho outside the submitted work. YG reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharma, Taiho, and Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. NH received a research grant from Boehringer Ingelheim and lecture fees from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. MK received personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharma, MSD, and Taiho outside the submitted work. KI reports personal fees from GSK, MSD, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., and he received research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. and Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
© The Author(s) 2024.