Overview on miRNA as biomarkers in liquid biopsy for MPM
Author | Biomarker | Study design | Samples | Role |
---|---|---|---|---|
Santarelli et al. 2011 [77] | miR-126 | MPM = 44; AES = 196; HS = 55 | Serum | Diagnosis: MPM vs. AES (sensitivity 73%, specificity 74%) |
Kirschner et al. 2011 [84] | miR-625 | MPM = 30; AES = 10 | Serum | Diagnosis: MPM vs. AES (sensitivity 70%, specificity 90%) |
Weber et al. 2012 [88] | miR-103a | MPM = 23; AES = 17 | Blood | Diagnosis: MPM vs. AES (sensitivity 83%, specificity 71%) |
Weber et al. 2017 [81] | miR-132 | MPM = 21; AES = 21 | Plasma | Diagnosis: MPM vs. AES (sensitivity 86%, specificity 61%) |
Cavalleri et al. 2017 [87] | miR-103 + miR-30e EVs | MPM = 23; AES = 19 | Plasma | Diagnosis: MPM vs. AES (sensitivity 95.5%, specificity 80%) |
GV designed the paper and wrote the manuscript. DDN co-wrote the manuscript. MB and RL reviewed the literature. MF, ADT and GG provided critical revision of the article. All authors read and approved the submitted version.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
© The Authors 2020.