Overview of some important immune cell types, their roles in the TME of BC, associated markers, and therapeutic implications
Immune cell type | Role in BC TME | Markers | Therapeutic implications |
---|---|---|---|
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) | TAMs are abundant in the TME and polarize into pro-tumorigenic M2 macrophages, promoting immunosuppression, angiogenesis, and tumor progression. | CD68, CD163 (M2), iNOS (M1), ARG1 | Reprogramming TAMs from M2 to M1 using cytokines or inhibitors can enhance anti-tumor immunity. Targeting PD-L1 on TAMs or disrupting recruitment pathways (e.g., CCL2-CCR2) is under investigation |
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) | MDSCs suppress T cell activation, inhibit immune responses, and create a microenvironment favoring tumor progression. | CD11b, CD33, CD15, CD14 | Targeting MDSCs with agents that inhibit recruitment or function can improve immune checkpoint blockade efficacy |
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) | Tregs suppress immune responses by inhibiting cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells, contributing to immune escape. | CD4, CD25, FOXP3, TIGIT | Reducing Treg activity or targeting TIGIT can enhance anti-tumor immunity |
Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) | CTLs mediate anti-tumor effects by recognizing and killing tumor cells. In BC, their activity is often impaired due to TME immunosuppression. | CD8, granzyme B, perforin | Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/PD-L1 restore CTL functionality and enhance tumor cell killing |
Natural killer (NK) cells | NK cells can kill tumor cells directly and influence the TME through cytokine production. | CD56, CD16, NKp46 | Activating NK cells or enhancing their cytotoxicity through cytokines or immune modulators can improve anti-tumor responses |
Dendritic cells (DCs) | DCs are crucial for antigen presentation and the activation of T cells. However, in the TME, their functionality is often impaired. | CD11c, HLA-DR, CD80/CD86 | Therapies to enhance DC activation or antigen presentation are being explored, including DC-based vaccines |
B cells | B cells exhibit dual roles, promoting or inhibiting tumor progression depending on subtype. They are involved in antibody production and modulating immune responses. | CD19, CD20, CD138, CXCL13 | Targeting immunosuppressive regulatory B cells (Bregs) or enhancing tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) can improve anti-tumor immunity |
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) | CSCs contribute to tumor recurrence, therapy resistance, and immune evasion by interacting with the TME. | CD44, CD133, OCT4, SOX2 | Targeting CSCs with therapies directed at their unique markers and pathways (e.g., Wnt/β-catenin, STAT3) may reduce recurrence and enhance treatment efficacy |
Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) | CAFs remodel the extracellular matrix, promote immune evasion, and secrete cytokines that suppress T cell activity. | α-SMA, FAP, PDGFRα/β, CXCL12 | Modulating CAF activity or targeting pathways like TGF-β signaling can enhance immune cell infiltration and therapy responsiveness |
Neutrophils | Neutrophils release enzymes that remodel the extracellular matrix and promote angiogenesis and metastasis. | CD66b, MPO, CXCR1/CXCR2 | Targeting tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) or their recruitment pathways (e.g., CXCR1/2) may reduce metastasis and enhance anti-tumor responses |
TME: tumor microenvironment; iNOS: inducible nitric oxide synthase; PD-L1: programmed death-ligand 1; BC: bladder cancer; PD-1: programmed cell death protein-1; SOX2: SRY homology box 2; FAP: fibronectin attachment protein; TGF-β: transforming growth factor-beta
ADS and LM: Conceptualization. ADS, SB, VV, and LM: Writing—original draft. ADS, SB, and LM: Writing—review & editing. ADS: Visualization. LM: Supervision. All the authors read and approved the submitted version.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
This research was funded by Fondi di Ateneo per la ricerca [MOR22FAR2022, MOR23FAR2023] to L.M., University of Insubria, Varese, Italy. A.D.S. conducted this research as part of his/her PhD training in Experimental and Translational Medicine at the University of Insubria, supported by institutional and doctoral program funding. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.