Clinically relevant advantages and limitations of PROTAC degraders compared to small molecule inhibitors
Features | PROTAC degraders | Small molecule inhibitors |
---|---|---|
Pharmacodynamic profile | Active in inhibitor-resistant cancer models [4, 44] | Acquired resistance is common [1, 44] |
Selectivity | More selective and less off-target toxicity [3, 5, 45–47] | Side effects due to off-target toxicity [3] |
Pharmacokinetic profile | Sustained target degradation and less frequent dosing [4] | Reversible target binding is common with frequent dosing [1] |
Scope of application | Tolerate low affinity target binding for action; target protein complexes [6] | Require high affinity binding to protein target [6] |
ADME | Higher molecular weight and potentially poor penetration to the cells; complex design may lead to rapid drug metabolism and excretion [4, 7] | ADME profile can be readily optimized [4] |
Resistance mechanism | Complex design can be associated with multiple mechanisms of resistance [9] | Often due to point mutations at the binding pocket of protein target [4] |
ADME: absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion
HX, JL and DMAG wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The support grant to Dr. Hao Xie was from H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
© The Author(s) 2021.