Oral VEGFR inhibitors and erlotinib in EGFR wild type NSCLC patients
Author | Phase | Line of Treatment | Patients | Treatment | Response rate (%) | Progression-free survival (months) | Overall survival (months) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spigel et al. [29] | II | Second line | 168 | Sorafenib + erlotinib vs. placebo + erlotinib | 8 vs. 11, P = 0.555 | 3.38 vs. 1.94, HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.60-1.22 P = 0.196 | 7.62 vs. 7.23, HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.59-1.34 P = 0.290 |
Scagliotti et al. [32] | III | Second line | 960 | Sunitinib + erlotinib vs. placebo + erlotinib | 10.6 vs. 6.9, P = 0.0471 | 3.6 vs. 2.0 HR: 0.807; 95% CI: 0.695-0.937 P = 0.0023 | 9.0 vs. 8.5, HR: 0.922; 95% CI: 0.797-1.067 P = 0.1388 |
Groen et al. [33] | II | Second line | 132 | Sunitinib + erlotinib vs. placebo + erlotinib | 4.6 vs. 3.0, P = 0.624 | 2.8 vs. 2.0 HR: 0.898; 80% CI: 0.671-1.203 P = 0.321 | 8.2 vs. 7.6 HR: 1.066; 95% CI: 0.705-1.612 P = 0.617 |
GP and AM conceived the paper and prepared the majority of the first draft, while the other authors contributed further sections. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version.
AM declares the following speakers’ bureau: Roche, Takeda, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, BMS. The other authors declare that no conflicts of interest.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
© The Author(s) 2020.