Summary of studies evaluating pNK cell cytotoxicity (pNKC) and proportions in women with a history of RPL

StudyNPatientsNKCNK cell proportion/counts
Aoki et al. [66]24≥ 2 consecutive 1st-trimester RPL (24) vs. nonpregnant controls (44)Increased preconception NKC with the association of miscarriage rates compared to controls (71% vs. 20%; RR 3.5, 95% CI = 1.8–6.5)-
Kwak et al. [8]116≥ 3 RPL, 35 pregnant and 81 nonpregnant women. Nonpregnant controls (17) and pregnant controls (22)-Increased in CD56+ in nonpregnant RPL vs. nonpregnant controls
Increased CD56+ and CD56+/CD16+ pNK cells in pregnant RPL vs. pregnant controls
Emmer et al. [67]43> 2 RPL before 16 weeks (43), 37 healthy controlsNo difference in nonpregnant RPL vs. controls
Increased NKC during early pregnancy in the RPL group
No difference in CD56+ and CD56+/CD16+ pNK prepregnancy in RPL vs. controls
Increased CD56+/CD16+ pNK during early pregnancy in the RPL group
Morikawa et al. [68]113113 nonpregnant women with a history of RPL. 39 controls who subsequently experienced a live birthElevated pre-conception NKC in women who miscarried vs. women who delivered (42.8% ± 15.8% vs. 32.1% ± 13.7%; P = 0.09)CD56+ pNK cells (%) not related to cause and number of RPL
Yamada et al. [69]6666 pregnant women with a history of RPL, no controls includedNKC subsequently decreased in the first trimester in livebirth group 32.5% ± 12.3%, 28.1% ± 12.1%, 28.0% ± 11.8% at 4–5 WG, 6–7 WG, 8–9 WG
Miscarriage group with normal karyotype had significantly higher NKC at 6–7 WG 41.2% ± 19% vs. 28.1% ± 12.1%
-
Yamada et al. [70]113113 nonpregnant women with a history of RPL > 2, no controls includedIncreased preconception NKC in women who had a SAB or biochemical pregnancy vs. livebirth (47% vs. 33%)Increased preconception pNK % in women who had a SAB or biochemical pregnancy vs. livebirth (17.1% vs. 13.1%)
Shakhar et al. [71]6738 primary RPL (pRPL)
29 secondary RPL (sRPL)
Primary aborters had higher NKC than secondary aborters or controlsPrimary aborters had higher pNK % and counts than secondary aborters and controls
Michou et al. [72]9925 RPL
30 sporadic SAB
33 infertile
11 fertile controls
-Decreased CD56+CD16CD3 pNK cells in sporadic aborters and infertile women
Perricone et al. [65]53APS with (25) and without RPL (28)-Increased CD56+ pNK % and counts in patients with RPL and APS than APS alone (15.18% ± 7.32% vs. 8.79% ± 4.68%, P ≤ 0.001)
Wang et al. [73]85Nonpregnant women with > 2 consecutive SABs (85) and nonpregnant women controls (27)-No difference in peripheral CD56+CD16+ NK cells in controls vs. RPL (16.6 ± 6.0 vs. 16.5 ± 6.5), or in CD56+ 16 (3.8 ± 1.7 vs. 4.4 ± 2.4)
King et al. [74]104Nonpregnant women, with a history of ≥3 consecutive RPL in the mid-luteal phase (104) vs. controls (33)-Patients with RPL had higher pNK % (11.9% vs. 8.8%, P < 0.001) and lower CD56bright:CD56dim (0.54 vs. 0.09, P < 0.05) than controls
Karami et al. [63]2323, > 2 RPL patients
36, healthy controls
Increased cytotoxicity in RPL vs. controls (32.14 vs. 10.74, P < 0.001)Increased CD56dim pNK cell proportion in RPL vs. controls (12.94 vs. 5.37, P < 0.001)
Lee et al. [75]95≥3 idiopathic RPL before 20 weeks. 95 nonpregnant women
29 fertile controls
RPL patients had increased levels of NKC compared to controlsRPL patients had increased CD56+ pNK cells (%) compared to controls
Ahmadi et al. [76]78≥3 RPL with the current positive pregnancy test
38 treated with IVIg, 40 no treatment controls
IVIg treatment lowered NKC after 32 weeks of gestation (P < 0.0001)IVIg treatment lowered NK cell percentage after 32 weeks of gestation (P < 0.0001)

CI: confidence interval; NKC: NK cell cytotoxicity; SAB: spontaneous abortion; IVIg: intravenous immunoglobulin; RR: relative risk; N: sample size