Summary of the most relevant studies about CIPN and PA
Reference | Number subjects, age, median (range), sex, IG–CG | Diagnosis | Methods | Protocol | Outcome measurement | Results | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kneis et al. [11] | Pre-protocol subjects:N = 37IG: 18, female: 14, male: 4, age median 70 (44–82)CG: 19, female: 12, male: 7, age median 60 (46–75) | Breast cancer, colorectal cancer, gynecological cancer, upper gastrointestinal cancer, NSCLC, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, multiple myeloma | One-on-one IG: 12 weeks twice/weekly (endurance + balance training)CG: active control group (endurance training) | Endurance training:30 min stable bike moderate intensity (under the IAT)Balance training:3–8 exercises 3 repetitions each 20/30 s progressively increasing exercise difficulty (reducing the support surface, visual input, adding motor/cognitive tasks, and instability induction | Functional performanceCIPN symptoms and QoL Cardiorespiratory fitness | Endurance training induced a reduction in sensory symptoms in both groups, while balance training additionally improved patients’ functional status | Both exercises provide a clear and relevant benefit for patients with CIPN |
Streckman et al. [12] | N = 61IG: 30CG: 31 | Lymphoma | IG: 36 weeks, 2 times per week (sensorimotor-, endurance- and strength training)CG: usual care | Endurance training:Treadmill, bike-dynamometer 70–80% HRmaxSensorimotor:4 postural stabilization tasks progressively increase task difficultyResistance training:4 exercises carried out at maximum force | QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire)Movement coordination, endurance, strength, and therapy-induced side-effects | Increase of balance in IG compared with CG. Static (P = 0.03), dynamic (P = 0.007), perturbed (P = 0.009), and bipedal (P = 0.006) | Exercise, especially sensorimotor training provide benefit to cancer patients, ↑ QoL (emotional function, pain, constipation, diarrhea), ↓ side-effects, ↑ balance control, ↑ mobility |
Kleckner et al.[13] | N = 355, age: 56 ± 11, 93% femaleIG: 170CG: 185 | Different types of cancer (mostly breast cancer) | IG: 6 weeks, daily session (EXCAP©®)CG: usual care | Endurance training:Low-to-moderate walking: 60–85% of HRRStrength training:Bands: RPE of 3–5 (1–10 scale) | Effects of exercise on CIPN symptomsFactors that predict CIPN symptomsFactors that moderate effects of exercise on CIPN symptoms | Reduction symptoms (on 10-point scale) hot/cold in hand/feet (-0.46 point) P = 0.045; reduction numbness and tingling (-0.42 point) P = 0.061More effect in older people (P = 0.086), male (P = 0.028), and breast cancer (0.076) | Exercise appears to reduce CIPN symptoms in patients receiving taxane-, platinum-, or vinca alkaloid-based chemotherapy |
Vollmers et al. [14] | N = 36IG: 17, age: 48.56 ± 11.94CG: 19, age: 52.39 ± 10.14 | Breast cancer | IG: 2 times/week during chemotherapy and 6 weeks after the end (physical training and sensorimotor exercises)CG: received an instruction sheet with a PA program to do autonomously by the patients | Not reported | Balance, upper and lower strength, QoL (EORTC and MFI questionnaires) | No significant difference reported | ↑ Postural stability in IGModerate strength exercises proved to prevent a loss of upper extremity strength↑ In the decreased intensity of CIPN or possibly faster remission |
Zimmer et al. [15] | N = 30IG: 17CG: 13 | Colorectal cancer | IG: 8 weeks–two times/week (a combo of endurance and resistance training)CG: usual care (written standard recommendations to obtain physical fitness) | Endurance training:Walking, bicycle ergometer, or cross-trainerResistance training:Circuit training of bench press, lat pulldown, leg press, seated row, and abdominal exercise | Trial outcome index (TOI)Balance | Neuropathic symptoms remained stable in the IG over time, while CIPN significantly worsened in CG of 7.14 points (P = 0.077) of the FACT/GOG-NTX questionnaire IG significantlyImproved strength and balance function | ↓ CIPN symptoms, ↑ balance, ↑ strength, ↑ QoL |
Henke et al. [16] | N = 29IG: 18CG: 11 | Lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC) | IG: 5 times/week endurance training and breathing technique; 2 times/week strength trainingCG: usual care | Endurance training:Walking 55–70% of HRRStrength training:50% of RM | Barthel indexQoL (EORTC QLQ C-30/LC-13 questionnaire) | Barthel index was significantly worse after the intervention in CG (P = 0.041); functional capacity increased more in IG (6MWT); an increased single score of EORTC QLQ C-30/LC-13 questionnaire | ↑ QoL (physical functioning, hemoptysis, pain in arms or shoulder, peripheral neuropathy, cognitive functioning)Training has a positive effect on the patient’s endurance and strength capacity |
Wonders et al. [17] | N = 6 (finished the intervention), female subjects | Breast cancer | IG: 10-week home-based programCG: not present | Endurance training:Moderate-intensity 55–65% of their self-estimated HRRIncrease gradually from 20 min (1st week) to 150 min (10th week) of exercise per weekResistance training:Not reported | CIPN symptoms rateQoL (McGill QoL questionnaire) | Significantly lowered levels of both troublesome and pain symptoms | ↓ CIPN symptoms↑ QoL (level of troublesome symptoms related to peripheral neuropathy)Low adherence rateDifficulty getting subjects to complete the 10-week program |
Andersen Hammond et al. [18] | N = 48IG: 22 mean age 56.3 ± 9.9CG: 26 mean age 53.0 ± 10.3 | Breast cancer | IG: 3 times daily home-based exercise program; 5/10 min every sessionCG: usual care | Nerve gliding exercise program | Effects of exercise on CIPN symptomsQoL (DASH questionnaire)Strength | Less pain for IG (P = 0.053) preservation of vibration (P = 0.001) and heat pain thresholds (left P = 0.021, right P = 0.039)Significant improvements in grip strength | ↓ CIPN pain↓ Pain pressure↑ Grip dynamometry |
Van Waart et al. [19] | N = 230IG: 153; HBI = 77, HIP = 76CG: 77 | Breast or colon cancer | IG: divided into “Onco-Move program” and “OnTrack program”CG: usual care | Onco-Move:Home-based program, 30 min, 5 days/week, 12–14 Borg Scale, exercises not reportedOnTrack program:Supervised 20 min, 2 days/weekEndurance training:30 minutes, 50% to 80% of the maximal workload, exercises not reportedResistance training:2 series of 8 repetitions at 80% of the 1RM | Cardiorespiratory fitness, upper muscle strength, lower muscle strength, fatigue, QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire), functioning in daily life, quality of sleep, return to work, psychological distress, self-reported PA level, chemotherapy regimen, dose, and adverse effects of chemotherapy, compliance with exercise programs | IGs: less decline of cardiorespiratory fitness (P < 0.001), better physical functioning (P < 0.001), less pain (HBI P = 0.003, HIP P = 0.011) | Both IGs provide a benefit for patients, especially the HIP group |
McCrary et al. [20] | A single group for pre and postN = 29 mean age 61.6 (32–79)Female 21, male 8 | Breast cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, appendix cancer, lymphoma, myeloma, urothelial, carcinoma | IG: 8 weeks, 3 times weekly (resistance training, balance training, and endurance training)CG: not present | Exercises performed at RPE of 13–15 (6–20 scale) | Objective CIPN, patient-reported CIPN, patient-reported disability, QoL (SF-36 questionnaire), mobility, dynamic balance/leg strength, standing balance, sensoryneurophysiology, motor neurophysiology | Dynamic balance, standing balance in eye-open conditions, mobility, and QoL were improved (P ≤ 0.05)Ameliorating objective CIPN and patient reported CIPN | Significance increasing of:Objective CIPN, patient-reported CIPN, patient-reported disability, QoL, mobilityDynamic balance, stable surfacewith eyes open, unstable surface with eyes open |
IG: intervention group; CG: control group; HRmax: maximum heart rate; HRR: heart rate reserve; RM: maximum repetitions; RPE: rated perceived exertion; IAT: individual anaerobic threshold; 1RM: one repetition maximum; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; SCLC: small-cell lung cancer; ↑: increase; ↓: decrease; 6MWT: 6-minute walking test; HBI: home-based intervention; HIP: high intensity program