This table outlines the advantages and disadvantages of using GIUS for various gastrointestinal conditions, highlighting its diagnostic strengths and limitations compared to other imaging methods

ConditionAdvantages of GIUSDisadvantages of GIUS
Acute appendicitisHighly effective in children and thin adults
Can visualize the inflamed appendix, assess for free fluid and local fat inflammation
Can rule out other causes of right lower quadrant pain
May miss appendix if retrocecal
Less sensitive than CT
Acute diverticulitisRapid assessment tool that helps identify inflamed diverticula and complications such as abscesses or perforations
Useful in settings where immediate CT is unavailable
Less detailed than CT, particularly in obese patients or in visualizing smaller abscesses
Small bowel obstructionCan quickly identify dilated bowel loops and the presence of fluid, potentially pinpointing the location of the obstruction
Real-time evaluation of bowel peristalsis can help differentiate between mechanical ileus and paralytic ileus
Ideal for serial examinations due to lack of radiation
Limited in differentiating between simple and strangulated obstructions; less detailed than CT in identifying the exact cause or level of obstruction
Intestinal ischemiaCan rapidly detect signs of ischemia such as bowel wall thickening and free fluid; useful for initial bedside evaluation
CEUS can demonstrate the absence of vascularization in the thickened intestinal tract, providing critical information on the extent of ischemia
May not identify the cause of ischemia, such as arterial emboli or venous thrombosis
Less sensitive and specific than CT
Intestinal perforationQuick to perform and can identify free intra-abdominal air and fluid indicating perforation, guiding urgent surgical intervention
Can also adeptly detect small air bubbles anterior to the liver
Less sensitive in detecting localized perforations compared to CT
Less effective in pinpointing the exact location of the perforation compared to CT
Crohn’s diseaseUseful in detecting and monitoring bowel wall thickening, abscesses, and other complications
Non-radiative and can be repeated frequently for follow-ups
Less effective than MRI in visualizing deep structures and assessing fistulae or the full extent of intestinal involvement
Ulcerative colitisCan assess bowel wall thickness and vascularization during flares and can be useful for quick evaluations during symptomatic periodsDoes not provide detailed mucosal imaging as endoscopy and has limited utility in assessing deep ulcerations
Infectious enteritisQuick, non-invasive assessment tool to evaluate bowel wall thickening and to differentiate from other causes of acute abdominal painNot specific for identifying pathogens
Limited use in mild or early disease
Malabsorption and celiac diseaseHelps identify complications such as bowel thickening, intussusception, or lymphoma in advanced casesNot diagnostic for celiac disease or other specific malabsorption disorders
Masses and neoplastic lesionsCan quickly detect the presence and location of masses
Useful for initial assessment and guiding further diagnostic procedures
Limited in characterizing the nature of lesions compared to CT, MRI and endoscopy, particularly with deep or small lesions
Common to all conditionsNo radiation exposure (particularly beneficial for pediatric populations)
Can be performed bedside during the clinical evaluation
Can be frequently repeated for necessary follow-ups
Limited effectiveness in obese patients
Highly operator-dependent

CEUS: contrast-enhanced ultrasound; GIUS: gastro-intestinal ultrasound