This table outlines the advantages and disadvantages of using GIUS for various gastrointestinal conditions, highlighting its diagnostic strengths and limitations compared to other imaging methods
Condition | Advantages of GIUS | Disadvantages of GIUS |
---|---|---|
Acute appendicitis | Highly effective in children and thin adultsCan visualize the inflamed appendix, assess for free fluid and local fat inflammationCan rule out other causes of right lower quadrant pain | May miss appendix if retrocecalLess sensitive than CT |
Acute diverticulitis | Rapid assessment tool that helps identify inflamed diverticula and complications such as abscesses or perforationsUseful in settings where immediate CT is unavailable | Less detailed than CT, particularly in obese patients or in visualizing smaller abscesses |
Small bowel obstruction | Can quickly identify dilated bowel loops and the presence of fluid, potentially pinpointing the location of the obstructionReal-time evaluation of bowel peristalsis can help differentiate between mechanical ileus and paralytic ileusIdeal for serial examinations due to lack of radiation | Limited in differentiating between simple and strangulated obstructions; less detailed than CT in identifying the exact cause or level of obstruction |
Intestinal ischemia | Can rapidly detect signs of ischemia such as bowel wall thickening and free fluid; useful for initial bedside evaluationCEUS can demonstrate the absence of vascularization in the thickened intestinal tract, providing critical information on the extent of ischemia | May not identify the cause of ischemia, such as arterial emboli or venous thrombosisLess sensitive and specific than CT |
Intestinal perforation | Quick to perform and can identify free intra-abdominal air and fluid indicating perforation, guiding urgent surgical interventionCan also adeptly detect small air bubbles anterior to the liver | Less sensitive in detecting localized perforations compared to CTLess effective in pinpointing the exact location of the perforation compared to CT |
Crohn’s disease | Useful in detecting and monitoring bowel wall thickening, abscesses, and other complicationsNon-radiative and can be repeated frequently for follow-ups | Less effective than MRI in visualizing deep structures and assessing fistulae or the full extent of intestinal involvement |
Ulcerative colitis | Can assess bowel wall thickness and vascularization during flares and can be useful for quick evaluations during symptomatic periods | Does not provide detailed mucosal imaging as endoscopy and has limited utility in assessing deep ulcerations |
Infectious enteritis | Quick, non-invasive assessment tool to evaluate bowel wall thickening and to differentiate from other causes of acute abdominal pain | Not specific for identifying pathogensLimited use in mild or early disease |
Malabsorption and celiac disease | Helps identify complications such as bowel thickening, intussusception, or lymphoma in advanced cases | Not diagnostic for celiac disease or other specific malabsorption disorders |
Masses and neoplastic lesions | Can quickly detect the presence and location of massesUseful for initial assessment and guiding further diagnostic procedures | Limited in characterizing the nature of lesions compared to CT, MRI and endoscopy, particularly with deep or small lesions |
Common to all conditions | No radiation exposure (particularly beneficial for pediatric populations)Can be performed bedside during the clinical evaluationCan be frequently repeated for necessary follow-ups | Limited effectiveness in obese patientsHighly operator-dependent |
CEUS: contrast-enhanced ultrasound; GIUS: gastro-intestinal ultrasound