Surgical series with seizure outcomes in AVM patients undergoing microsurgery, SRS, and EVE since 1992
Author (publication year) study type | Number of patients (percentage of total AVM oclussion) | Number of patients with seizures prior to procedure (percentage) | Number of patients with seizures who were followed | Follow-up (months) | Unruptured/Ruptured AVMs | Clinical outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsurgery | ||||||
Nagata et al. [113] (2006) retrospective cohort | 26 (100%) | 11 (42%) | 11 | NA | 4/7 | Ruptured AVMs: good seizure controlUnruptured AVMs: 50% of recurrent psychomotor seizures after the total AVMs excisionDe novo seizure: 9% |
Piepgras et al. [114] (1993) retrospective cohort | 280 (NA) | 117 (42%) | 110 | 90 | NA/NA | Seizure-free: 83% (48% without ASM); improved: 13%; same: 2%; worse: 2%De novo seizures: 6% |
Thorpe et al. [48] (2000) retrospective cohort | 114 (100%) | 53 (46%) | 53 | 48 | NA/NA | Post-AVM surgery seizures: 21% (< 50% of the preoperative rate)De novo seizures: 6.3% (> 12 months post-AVM) |
Yeh et al. [65](1993) retrospective cohort | 54 (100%) | 54 (100%) | 54 | 57.6 | 54/0 | Excellent postoperative seizure control: 70.4%; good: 18.5%; fair: 9.3%; poor: 1.9%Two patients required a second operation to remove a remote seizure focusDe novo epilepsy: none |
Englot et al. [86] (2012) prospective cohort | 440 (NA) | 130 (30%) | 117 | 20.7 | NA | Engel class I: 96%Engel class II–IV: 4%De novo seizures: 3% |
Eliava et al. [97] (2021) retrospective cohort | 160 (NA) | 99 (61.9) | 59 | 59.3 | 99/0 | Engel class I: 84.8%Engel class IIA: 3.4%Engel class IIIA: 6.8%Engel class IV: 5.8%De novo epilepsy: none |
Ferlisi et al. [98] (2016) retrospective cohort | 110 (NA) | 60 (55%) | 40 | 132 | NA/NA | Engel class I: 77 % (IA: 47%, IB: 0, IC: 22%, ID: 7%)Engel class II: 7%Engel class III: 0Engel class IV: 15%De novo seizures: 56% (43% few seizures and became seizure-free at long follow-up, 13% postoperative epilepsy) |
von der Brelie et al. [99] (2015) retrospective cohort | 293 (99%) | 126 (43%) | 103 | 147 | 77/26 | DRE: ILAE I: 58.3% (ILAE IA: 45.8%)Chronic epilepsy: 80.5% (ILAE IA: 70.3%) of ILAE ISporadic seizures: 85.7% (ILAE IA: 69.1%) of ILAE IDe novo epilepsy: none |
Lopez-Ojeda et al. [100] (2013) retrospective cohort | 29 (93%) | 12 (41.3%) | 12 | 28.4 | 0/12 | Engel class I: 75%Engel class III: 8.3%Engel class IV: 16.6%De novo seizures: 11.8% |
SRS | ||||||
Andrade-Souza et al. [115] (2006) retrospective cohort | 38 (60.5%) | 27 (71%) | 27 | 42.4 | NA/NA | Engel I: 92.6%Engel II: (3.7%) 83% seizure-free in patients with AVMs smaller than 3 cm3De novo seizures: 2.6% |
Eisenschenk et al. [116] (1998) retrospective cohort | 100 (64%) | 33 (33%) | 32 | 26 | NA/NA | Seizure-free: 59% Marked reduction of seizure frequency: 19%Seizure remission was most frequent for AVMs of the centrum (83.3%)De novo seizures: NA |
Falkson et al. [117] (1997) retrospective cohort | 101 (NA) | 24 (24%) | 16 | 60 | NA/NA | Seizure-free: 63% Improved seizure frequency: 94%De novo seizures: NA |
Gerszten et al. [118] (1996) retrospective cohort | 72 (NA) | 15 (21%) | 13 | 47 | 7/8 | Seizure-free and off anticonvulsant therapy: 85%Significant improvement but continue medication: 3%De novo seizures: 3% |
Kida et al. [119] (2000) retrospective cohort | 462 (NA) | 79 (17%) | 79 | 24 | 58/21 | Seizures improved in 85.5%, modified in 11.6% and deteriorated in 2.9%Good seizure control: 94.7% of completely obliterated and 77.1% of incompletely obliterated AVMsDe novo seizures: NA |
Kurita et al. [120] (1998) retrospective cohort | 315 (NA) | 35 (11%) | 35 | 43 | 35/0 | Seizure free: 80%De novo seizures: 4.5% |
Lim et al. [121] (2006) retrospective cohort | 246 (NA) | 45 (18%) | 43 | 46 | 43/0 | Seizure-free: 53.5%; significant improvement: 23.3%; unchanged: 18.6%; aggravated: 4.6%Complete obliteration in 49%De novo seizures: NA |
Nataf et al. [122] (2003) retrospective cohort | 57 (61.2%) | 6 (11%) | 5 | 40 | 5/0 | Seizure-free without medication: 80%De novo seizures: NA |
Silander et al. [123] (2004) retrospective cohort | 26 (NA) | 9 (35%) | 9 | 41 | NA/NA | Seizure-free: 78%De novo seizures: none |
Steiner et al. [124] (1992) retrospective cohort | 247 (NA) | 59 (24%) | 59 | 24 | NA/NA | Seizure-free without anticonvulsant medication: 18.6%Seizure-free with anticonvulsant medication: 50.8%De novo seizures: 5.8% |
Sutcliffe et al. [125] (1992) retrospective cohort | 160 (76%) | 48 (30%) | 48 | 24 | NA/NA | Improved epilepsy: 60.4% (worsened transiently in only three of these)De novo seizures: NA |
Zeiler et al. [126] (2011) retrospective cohort | 69 (87.8%) | 24 (35%) | 20 | 36 | 20/0 | Seizures-free: 95% (55% still on ASM)De novo seizures: 5.7% |
Bowden et al. [102] (2014) retrospective cohort | 87 (50%) | 36 (41%) | 36 | 64 | NA/NA | Engel class I: 53%De novo seizures: none |
Mooney et al. [103] (2022) retrospective cohort | 210 (NA) | 35 (17%) | 35 | 43 | 33/2 | Seizure free: 46.7%De novo seizures: 18% |
Ditty et al. [104] (2017) retrospective cohort | 204 (NA) | 78 (38.2%) | 78 | 37.2 | 69/9 | Engel class I: 80.8%Engel class II–IV: 19.2%De novo seizures: 3% |
Schauble et al. [105] (2004) retrospective cohort | 285 (NA) | 65 (38.2%) | 65 | 48 | 55/10 | Seizure outcome after the first year: Engel ≤ 4: 73.9%; Engel ≥ 5: 26.1%Seizure outcome after the third year: Engel ≤ 4: 78.4%; Engel ≥ 5: 21.6%De novo seizures: NA |
Przybylowski et al. [106] (2015) retrospective cohort | 79 (58%) | 76 (96%) | 76 | 78.2 | 60/13 | Engel class IA or IB: 65 patientsEngel class II–IV: 8 patientsDe novo seizures: 7.6% |
Yang et al. [107] (2012) retrospective cohort | 86 (70%) | 86 (53.4%) | 86 | 89.8 | 86/0 | Seizure-free, off antiepileptic drug: 58.1%De novo seizures: 13.3% |
Ding et al. [109] (2015) retrospective study | 229 (58%) | 229(100%) | 229 | 65–95 | 208/21 | Seizure improvement: 37.6%; remission: 20%; unchanged: 37.6%; worse: 4.8%De novo seizures: 1.7% |
Niranjan et al. [110] (2018) retrospective cohort | 155 (78%) | 155(100%) | 155 | 86 | 125/30 | Seizure-free status: 70%; improved: 15%; worsened: 2%De novo seizures: NA |
Ding et al. [111] (2015) control-case cohort | 175 (63%) | 66 | 66 | 73 | 97/78 | Seizure control: 62 %De novo seizures: 2% |
EVE | ||||||
De Los Reyes et al. [127] (2011) retrospective cohort | 20 (NA) | 10 (50%) | 10 | 2.8 | NA/NA | Seizure-free status: 50%De novo seizures: 20% |
Le Feuvre and Taylor [128] (2007) retrospective cohort | 46 (NA) | 16 (35%) | 16 | 39 | NA/NA | Improved seizures: 56%De novo seizures: none |
Khumtong et al. [112] (2022) retrospective cohort | 372 (NA) | 105 (28%) | 86(83 followed EVE) | 24 | 75/30 | 2-year seizure-free outcome: 76.2%De novo seizures: NA |
Zhang et al. [71] (2019) retrospective cohort | 239 (NA) | 68 (29%) | 37 | 37 | 32/5 | Engel class I: 51.4%De novo seizures: 0.6% |
Lv et al. [94] (2010) retrospective cohort | 109 (NA) | 30 (27.5%) | 30 | 80 | 30/0 | Excellent seizure control: 70%; good:13%; fair: 7%; poor: 10%De novo seizures: none |
Microsurgery/RSR/EVE | ||||||
Hoh et al. [14] (2002) retrospective cohort | 424 (NA) | 141 (NA; 33%) | 110 (67/37/6) | 35 | 73/37 | Engel class I: 66%Engel class II: 10%Engel class III: 0.9%Engel class IV: 20%De novo seizures: NA |
Hyun et al. [101] (2012) retrospective cohort | 399 (NA) | 86 (32/50/4; 22%) | 86 (32/50/4) | 72 | NA/NA | Engel class I: 78%De novo seizures: 2.8% |
Wang et al. [108] (2013) retrospective cohort | 164 (NA) | 49 (NA; 30%) | 49 (NA) | 38 | 41/8 | No postreatment seizure: 39.6%(58.8% after surgery, 26.7% after SRS)De novo seizures: 19% |
NA: non-available information; ILAE I: free of disabling seizures (A: completely seizure free since surgery; B: non-disabling simple partial seizures only since surgery; C: some disabling seizures after surgery, but free of disabling seizures for at least 2 years; D: generalized convulsions with ASM discontinuation only)