Impact of obesity on drug retention
Author, year | Study design, duration | Biologic | Total (n) | Obese (n) | Retention rates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNFi | |||||
Bergstra et al. [67], 2020 | International register, follow up censored at 5000 days | Any TNFi | 5,232 (4,116 BMI data) | 734 | Underweight and overweight patients discontinued TNFi treatment earlier than normal-weight patients. Adjusted(Adj) HR underweight: 1.3 (95% CI 1.07, 1.58); Adj HR BMI 35–39.9: 1.28 (95% CI 1.06, 1.54); Adj HR BMI > 40: 1.67 (95% CI 1.29, 2.18). |
Elalouf et al. [68], 2021 | Registry, maximum follow-up 5 years | ETN, IFX, ADA, GLM | 521 | 223 | BMI is inversely associated with drug survival. BMI > 40 is more likely to discontinue treatment compared with normal weight patients HR 2.28 (95% CI 1.67–3.10). |
McCulley et al. [18] 2019 | Retrospective cohort | TNFi | 46,970 | 19,216 | Patients with normal BMI are more likely to discontinue treatment in fully adjusted model HR 1.14 (95% CI 1.07, 1.22) vs. overweight. |
Other modes of action | |||||
Alten et al. [70], 2017 | Observational bio-naive biologic failure, 12-month interim analysis | ABA | 674 (biologic naive); 1676 (biologic failure) | 155 (biologic naive); 405 (biologic failure) | No significant impact of BMI regardless of antibody status, or biological naive/exposed. |
Iannone et al. [54], 2017 | Pooled analysis of European registries, variable duration | ABA | 2,015 | 380 | No impact of obesity on drug retention; HR 1.08 (95% CI 0.89–1.30). |
Hilliquin et al. [71], 2021 | Prospective cohort, 12 months | TCZ | 291 | 57 | No difference in retention rates at 12 months in non-obese vs. obese 65.32% vs. 58.85%. |
Mixed biologics | |||||
Iannone et al. [62], 2015 | Retrospective review, up to 11 years | CTZ, ETN, IFX, GLM, ABA, RTX | 292 | 66 | 1st TNFi: no significant difference in drug survival between obese/non-obese;2nd TNFi: drug survival is lower in obese, patients vs. normal 43.5% vs. 80%. |
Rashid et al. [69], 2016 | Retrospective cohort, 6 years | Any bDMARD | 2,171 | 799 | Obesity predictor of need to switch bDMARD; OR 1.51 (95% CI 1.04–2.19). |
ABA: abatacept; ADA: adalimumab; Adj; adjusted; bDMARD: biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drug; BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; CTZ: certolizumab; ETN: etanercept; GLM: golimumab; HR: hazard ratio; IFX: infliximab; OR: odds ratio; RR: risk ratio; RTX: rituximab; SDAI: simplified disease activity index; TCZ: tocilizumab; TNFi: tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor
The authors acknowledge support from Keri Bramford-Hale for advice and assistance with database searches (CEBIS). We also thank Dr Toby Cox for reviewing the readability of the final version of the manuscript.
ZI: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. NJG: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing.
The authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest for this work.
The service evaluation was reviewed and registered by the University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust Research & Development Department. Ethical approval was not required (Ref SE0353).
Informed consent was not required for this analysis of routinely collected clinical data.
Not applicable.
Data sharing is not permitted within local approvals, but authors are willing to respond to readers’ reasonable questions.
ZI is supported by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Academic Clinical Fellowship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
© The Author(s) 2024.