Reasons for and against all people with gout receiving anti-inflammatory prophylaxis when initiating ULT
For | Against |
---|---|
ULT-induced flares are common and often lead ULT to be stopped | 1 in 4 people with gout do not experience ULT-induced flares, even without prophylaxis |
Prophylaxis reduces the incidence of ULT-induced flares, improving long-term adherence to ULT | ‘Start low, go slow’ ULT leads to fewer ULT-induced flares than historical fixed dosing |
Colchicine prophylaxis is cost-effective | Risk of adverse events |
Potential CV benefits of colchicine | Drug interactions, polypharmacy |
Difficulty predicting who is most at risk of ULT-induced flares | Difficulty predicting who is most at risk of adverse events |
- | Financial burden of prescription costs to individuals |
- | Some people may prefer the ‘pill in the pocket’ approach to treat flares than regular prophylaxis |
-: no data. CKD: chronic kidney disease; CV: cardiovascular; ULT: urate-lowering therapy
ER: Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. JAP: Writing—review & editing. CDM: Conceptualization, Writing—review & editing. All authors read and approved the submitted version.
CDM is director of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
© The Author(s) 2024.