Table Info

Table 2.

Panel data regression results

Meat (type 1)	Meat (type 2)	Pearson correlation	P-value	Correlation type	Correlation strength
Live pig medium	Piglet common	0.958496	5.04E–53	Positive	Strong
Live pig medium	Pork deboned meat	0.99805	4.775403E–115	Positive	Strong
Live pig medium	Live cattle medium	0.878612	6.25E–32	Positive	Strong
Live pig medium	Beef deboned meat	0.888971	1.21E–33	Positive	Strong
Live pig medium	Live sheep medium	0.743561	4.07E–18	Positive	Strong
Live pig medium	Mutton deboned meat	0.783125	4.22E–21	Positive	Strong
Live pig medium	Live chicken ordinary	0.718582	1.68E–16	Positive	Strong
Live pig medium	Chicken eggs ordinary	–0.02146	0.835624	Negative	None
Piglet common	Pork deboned meat	0.955103	1.87E–51	Positive	Strong
Piglet common	Live cattle medium	0.88383	8.97E–33	Positive	Strong
Piglet common	Beef deboned meat	0.902744	3.32E–36	Positive	Strong
Piglet common	Live sheep medium	0.708177	7.07E–16	Positive	Strong
Piglet common	Mutton deboned meat	0.755883	5.51E–19	Positive	Strong
Piglet common	Live chicken ordinary	0.635272	3.60E–12	Positive	Strong
Piglet common	Chicken eggs ordinary	–0.20743	0.042575	Negative	Weak
Pork deboned meat	Live cattle medium	0.889636	9.26E–34	Positive	Strong
Pork deboned meat	Beef deboned meat	0.898957	1.83E–35	Positive	Strong
Pork deboned meat	Live sheep medium	0.759088	3.21E–19	Positive	Strong
Pork deboned meat	Mutton deboned meat	0.797619	2.35E–22	Positive	Strong
Pork deboned meat	Live chicken ordinary	0.733198	2.00E–17	Positive	Strong
Pork deboned meat	Chicken eggs ordinary	–0.01044	0.919618	Negative	None
Live cattle medium	Beef deboned meat	0.992704	3.60E–88	Positive	Strong
Live cattle medium	Live sheep medium	0.911916	3.91E–38	Positive	Strong
Live cattle medium	Mutton deboned meat	0.949343	4.77E–49	Positive	Strong
Live cattle medium	Live chicken ordinary	0.795623	3.54E–22	Positive	Strong
Live cattle medium	Chicken eggs ordinary	0.078004	0.449999	Positive	None
Beef deboned meat	Live sheep medium	0.867309	3.13E–30	Positive	Strong
Beef deboned meat	Mutton deboned meat	0.917141	2.50E–39	Positive	Strong
Beef deboned meat	Live chicken ordinary	0.815107	5.18E–24	Positive	Strong
Beef deboned meat	Chicken eggs ordinary	0.027988	0.786632	Positive	None
Live sheep medium	Mutton deboned meat	0.990612	4.79E–83	Positive	Strong
Live sheep medium	Live chicken ordinary	0.675894	4.18E–14	Positive	Strong
Live sheep medium	Chicken eggs ordinary	0.247344	0.015115	Positive	Weak
Mutton deboned meat	Live chicken ordinary	0.73592	1.33E–17	Positive	Strong
Mutton deboned meat	Chicken eggs ordinary	0.215434	0.035033	Positive	Weak
Live chicken ordinary	Chicken eggs ordinary	0.406848	3.90E–05	Positive	Moderate

Declarations

Acknowledgment

The author wishes to acknowledge the China Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs for providing detailed data on the topic. The journal conforms to the guidelines set forth by the organizations. The author also wants to express gratitude to Dr. Yong He, Teo Parashkevov, and Richard Molnar for supporting me during the research period.

Author contributions

MS: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the author, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Funding

Not applicable.

Copyright

Publisher’s note

Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.

References

Vranken L, Avermaete T, Petalios D, Mathijs E. Curbing global meat consumption: Emerging evidence of a second nutrition transition. Environmental Science & Policy. 2014;39:95–106. [DOI]

Meat consumption [Internet]. OECD; [cited 2023 Nov 25]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/fa290fd0-en

Cai X, Chen J, Xiao Y, Xu X. Optimization and coordination of fresh product supply chains with freshness-keeping effort. Prod Oper Manag. 2010;19:261–78. [DOI]

Painter JA, Hoekstra RM, Ayers T, Tauxe RV, Braden CR, Angulo FJ, et al. Attribution of foodborne illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths to food commodities by using outbreak data, United States, 1998-2008. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:407–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

Waqas M, Yasir L, Nauman I, Syed R. Managing Supply Chain Risks in Fresh Food Items: Case Study on Makro-Habib Pakistan Limited – A Wholesale Chain in Pakistan [dissertation]. Linnaeus University; 2010.

Beltrán-Alcrudo D, Arias M, Gallardo C, Kramer S, Penrith ML. African swine fever: detection and diagnosis – A manual for veterinarians. FAO. 2017;19:88.

Dixon LK, Sun H, Roberts H. African swine fever. Antiviral Res. 2019;165:34–41. [DOI] [PubMed]

Ma M, Wang HH, Hua Y, Qin F, Yang J. African swine fever in China: Impacts, responses, and policy implications. Food Policy. 2021;102:102065. [DOI]

Mason-D’Croz D, Bogard JR, Herrero M, Robinson S, Sulser TB, Wiebe K, et al. Modelling the global economic consequences of a major African swine fever outbreak in China. Nat Food. 2020;1:221–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

10.

USDA’s 2019 Agricultural Forum: Recap and Takeaways [Internet]. USDA; [cited 23 February 2019]. Available from: https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/news/blog/2019/03/19/usdas-2019-agricultural-forum-recap-and-takeaways

11.

Marsh TL, Pendell D, Knippenberg R. Animal health economics: an aid to decisionmaking on animal health interventions - case studies in the United States of America. Rev Sci Tech. 2017;36:137–45. [DOI] [PubMed]

12.

Weir Sh. African Swine Fever, Part 1: A Look at the Past [Internet]. USDA; [cited 21 November 2024]. Available from: https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2022/10/11/african-swine-fever-part-1-look-past

13.

Sur JH. How far can African swine fever spread? J Vet Sci. 2019;20:e41. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

14.

Press Conference Held by China Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs on the Situation of Pig Production (in Chinese) [Internet]. [Cited 13 May 2023]. Available from: http://www.moa.gov.cn/hd/zbft_news/szscxs/

15.

Ding Y, Wang Y. Big government: The fight against the African Swine Fever in China. J Biosaf Biosecur. 2020;2:44–9. [DOI]

16.

Nguyen-Thi T, Pham-Thi-Ngoc L, Nguyen-Ngoc Q, Dang-Xuan S, Lee HS, Nguyen-Viet H, et al. An Assessment of the Economic Impacts of the 2019 African Swine Fever Outbreaks in Vietnam. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:686038. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

17.

African Swine Fever [Internet]. WOAH; c2024 [cited 29 Nov 2023]. Available from: https://www.woah.org/en/disease/african-swine-fever/#ui-id-2

18.

Ohouko OFH, Koudouvo K, Dougnon TJ, Agbonon A, Karim IYA, Farougou S, et al. African swine fever in Benin and prevalence of the disease in Southern Benin: A retrospective study (2014-2018). J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2020;7:464–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

19.

Babalobi OO, Olugasa BO, Oluwayelu DO, Ijagbone IF, Ayoade GO, Agbede SA. Analysis and evaluation of mortality losses of the 2001 African swine fever outbreak, Ibadan, Nigeria. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2007;39:533–42. [DOI] [PubMed]

20.

Kivumbi CC, Yona C, Hakizimana JN, Misinzo G. An assessment of the epidemiology and socioeconomic impact of the 2019 African swine fever outbreak in Ngara district, western Tanzania. Vet Anim Sci. 2021;14:100198. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

21.

Huang Y, Li J, Zhang J, Jin Z. Dynamical analysis of the spread of African swine fever with the live pig price in China. Math Biosci Eng. 2021;18:8123–48. [DOI] [PubMed]

22.

Mohan NH, Misha MM, Gupta VK. Consequences of African swine fever in India: Beyond economic implications. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021;68:3009–11. [DOI] [PubMed]

23.

Transparent and open food commodity markets are vital for food security and nutrition [Internet]. FAO; c2024 [cited 2022 Dec 12]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/Transparent-and-open-food-commodity-markets-are-vital-for-food-security-and-nutrition/en

24.

Food price monitoring and analysis [Internet]. FAO; c2024 [cited 2022 Dec 12]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/giews/food-prices/international-prices/detail/zh/c/1382029/

25.

You S, Liu T, Zhang M, Zhao X, Dong Y, Wu B, et al. African swine fever outbreaks in China led to gross domestic product and economic losses. Nat Food. 2021;2:802–8. [DOI] [PubMed]

26.

Brown VR, Bevins SN. A Review of African Swine Fever and the Potential for Introduction into the United States and the Possibility of Subsequent Establishment in Feral Swine and Native Ticks. Front Vet Sci. 2018;5:11. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

27.

Wang XH, Zhao B, Wang X. Digital agriculture mode innovation study: Based on the case of Netease Wei Yang Pig. Issues Agric Econ. 2020;08:115–30. Chinese.

28.

Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China [Internet]. PRC; [cited 2024 Mar 21]. Available from: http://english.moa.gov.cn/news_522/

29.

Professional Pig Community [Internet]. [Cited 2023 May 05]. Available from: https://www.pig333.com/

30.

Shao Y, Li M, Zhang W, Ji Y, Hayes DJ. World’s Largest Pork Producer in Crisis: China’s African Swine Fever Outbreak. Agricultural Policy Review. 2018.