Human studies on the effects of ketogenic diets therapy on different types of epilepsy
Authors/Country | Intervention characteristics | Main findings |
---|---|---|
Sharma et al. [86]/India |
| MAD was found to be effective and well tolerated in children with drug-refractory epilepsy. |
Wibisono et al. [87]/Australia |
| Lower rates of side effects were scored for MAD. The three KDs were comparably effective in seizure control and tolerability. |
Kim et al. [88]/Korea |
| MAD may be considered as the primary choice for the treatment of intractable epilepsy in children. KD is more suitable as diet therapy in children < 2 years of age. |
Lambrechts et al. [89]/The Netherlands |
| KD is an effective therapy for children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy. |
Kverneland et al. [90]/Norway |
| A significant reduction in seizure frequency was achieved with the MAD treatment compared to control. |
McDonald et al. [91]/USA |
| MAD significantly reduced seizures at the end of the treatment. |
Park et al. [92]/Korea |
| KD may be a feasible and safe therapeutic approach for SRSE patients in reducing the frequency of seizures. |
Sondhi et al. [93]/India |
| LGIT diet showed a balance between seizure reduction and relatively fewer adverse events compared to MAD and KD. |
Shegelman et al. [94]/USA |
| Lower seizure frequency was significantly associated with anxiety symptoms. MAD had a positive input on psychological state independent of seizure reduction or KB production. |
Rafli et al. [95]/Indonesia |
| MAD reduced the seizure frequency by 50% in the first month, 62% in the third, and > 83% in the sixth month. |
KD: ketogenic diet; MAD: modified Atkins diet; MCT: medium-chain triglyceride; LGIT: low glycemic index therapy diet; RCT: randomized controlled trial; KB: ketone body
ABR: Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Supervision. JJB: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—original draft. Both authors read and approved the submitted version.
Both authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.