Overall evaluation of SMART
Access to amenities | Minimum | Maximum | M | SD |
---|---|---|---|---|
App quality evaluation | 2.78 | 5.00 | 3.72 | 0.46 |
App subjective evaluation | 1.00 | 4.50 | 2.91 | 0.85 |
Perceived impact | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.32 | 1.01 |
We thank Ms. Breanna Jones for reviewing and reformatting in-text citations and references.
HL and HC: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. SY: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—review & editing. LX and TZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing. FB: Writing—review & editing. WSS: Data curation, Writing—review & editing. JW: Project administration, Writing—review & editing. All authors have reviewed, discussed, and agreed to their individual contributions.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
This study was approved by the SMHC ethics committee and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from all participants.
Not applicable.
The datasets generated and analyzed for this study can be requested via first and corresponding author.
Huijun Li is supported by “Enhancing Intervention of Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome with M-Health Technology” from National Institute of Mental Health [R21 1 R21 MH113674-01A1]. The funder supported study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, and writing of the report. The funder had no role in decision to publish.
© The Author(s) 2024.