Exploration of Cardiology

Features	Good author	Bad author
Key psychological trait	Perseverance	Narcisism
Criticisms of your work	A gift	A personal offense
Attitude vs. reviewers	Best friend of manuscript	Deadly enemy of the author
Revision strategy	Obeys like a little soldier	Objects and barks
Reaction after rejection	Reviewer understood too well	Reviewer did not understand
Paper after revision	Much improved	Resubmitted as it was

Declarations

Author contributions

EP: Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing.

Conflicts of interest

Eugenio Picano who is the Editor-in-Chief of Exploration of Cardiology had no involvement in the decision-making or the review process of this manuscript.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Copyright

References

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:309–16. [DOI]

Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. JAMA. 1993;269:2282–6. [DOI] [PubMed]

European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. The European charter for researchers – the code of conduct for the recruitment of researchers. Publications Office; 2006.

Martin B. Plagiarism, misrepresentation, and exploitation by established professionals: power and tactics. In: Bretag T, editor. Handbook of academic integrity. Singapore: Springer; 2016. pp. 913–27. [DOI]

Lüscher TF. The codex of science: honesty, precision, and truth—and its violations. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1018–23. [DOI] [PubMed]

Epstein RJ. Six authors in search of a citation: villains or victims of the Vancouver convention? BMJ. 1993;306:765–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

Pruschak G, Hopp C. And the credit goes to … - ghost and honorary authorship among social scientists. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0267312. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

Feigenbaum H, Waldhausen JA, Hyde LP. Ultrasound diagnosis of pericardial effusion. JAMA. 1965;191:711–4. [DOI] [PubMed]

Maron BJ. Harvey Feigenbaum, MD, and the creation of clinical echocardiography: a conversation with Barry J. Maron, MD. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120:2085–99. [DOI] [PubMed]

10.

Steinbrook R, Kassirer JP, Angell M. Justifying conflicts of interest in medical journals: a very bad idea. BMJ. 2015;350:h2942. [DOI] [PubMed]

11.

Geim AK, ter Tisha HAMS. Detection of earth rotation with a diamagnetically levitating gyroscope. Phys B. 2001;294-295:736–9. [DOI]

12.

Moran B, Hoover WG, Bestiale S. Diffusion in a periodic Lorentz gas. J Stat Phys. 1987;48:709–26. [DOI]

13.

Yam P. When your co-author is a monstrous ass [Internet]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN; c2024 [cited 2024 Mar 11]. Available from: https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/when-your-co-author-is-a-monstrous-ass/

14.

Parr C. Who is stronzo bestiale? [Internet]. THE - Times Higher Education; c2024 [cited 2024 Mar 11]. Available from: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/comment/opinion/who-is-stronzo-bestiale/2016568.article

15.

Simonton DK. The mad-genius paradox: can creative people be more mentally healthy but highly creative people more mentally Ill? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014;9:470–80. [DOI] [PubMed]

16.

Wislar JS, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, Deangelis CD. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2011;343:d6128. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

17.

Del Favero A, Barro G. Italy. The Lancet. 1996;348:167–75. [DOI]

18.

Stolker-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature. 2023;613:620–1. [DOI]

19.

Elali FL, Rachid LN. AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community. Patterns. 2023;4:100706. [DOI]

20.

Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature. 2023;613:612. [DOI]

21.

Rennie D. Let’s make peer review scientific. Nature. 2016;535:31–3. [DOI]