Table Info

Table 1.

FEA results of solid and octet metastructure-based compression specimen

Compression specimen	Load applied	Deformation (mm)	Elastic strain	Stress (σ_v) (MPa)	Yield strength (σ_y) at 0.2% of strain (MPa)	Safety factor against failure (N) = σ_y/σ_v
Solid	800 N	0.00075097 ± 0.0001	0.000049163 ± 0.00001	10.029 ± 1	625 ± 6 [25]	62.31 ± 6
Octet metastructure	800 N	0.001451 ± 0.001	0.00067179 ± 0.0001	131.61 ± 13	570 ± 5 [26]	4.33 ± 0.5
Solid	5,000 N	0.0046935 ± 0.001	0.00030727 ± 0.0001	62.682 ± 6	625 ± 6	9.97 ± 0.9
Octet metastructure	5,000 N	0.0090688 ± 0.001	0.002817 ± 0.001	545.57 ± 15	570 ± 5	1.04 ± 0.01

The FEA analysis of the specimen was done five times, and the average value was reported (average value ± SD). References [25] and [26] validate the observations. FEA: finite element analysis

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the research support provided by the National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research Chandigarh and Prof. Ashwani Kumar from Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University Ludhiana.

Author contributions

BK: Investigations, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. RS: Conceptualization. BSP: Supervisions. GS: Performed 3D analysis.

Conflicts of interest

Rupinder Singh who is the Guest Editor of Exploration of BioMat-X had no involvement in the decision-making or the review process of this manuscript. Other authors don’t have any conflicts of interest/competing interests.

Ethical approval

This experiment is a simulation study based on an existing oral model of experimental animals (Ludhiana Lab, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India) and does not involve any actual animals. Therefore, ethical approval from the animal experimentation ethics committee is not required.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The authors declare that the data can be available on reasonable request.

Funding

The authors thank the Department of Science and Technology, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research for funding under FIST Level-0 [SR/FST/College-/2020/997]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright

References

Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, Ramani K, Chen Y, Williams CB, et al. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput-Aided Des. 2015;69:65–89. [DOI]

Conner BP, Manogharan GP, Martof AN, Rodomsky LM, Rodomsky CM, Jordan DC, et al. Making sense of 3-D printing: creating a map of additive manufacturing products and services. Addit Manuf. 2014;1–4:64–76. [DOI]

Thompson MK, Moroni G, Vaneker T, Fadel G, Campbell RI, Gibson I, et al. Design for additive manufacturing: trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints. CIRP Ann. 2016;65:737–60. [DOI]

Yang L, Hsu K, Baughman B, Godfrey D, Medina F, Menon M, et al. Additive Manufacturing of Metals: The Technology, Materials, Design and Production. Cham: Springer; 2017. [DOI]

Kang D, Park S, Son Y, Yeon S, Kim SH, Kim I. Multi-lattice inner structures for high-strength and lightweight in metal selective laser melting process. Mater Des. 2019;175:107786. [DOI]

Milewski JO. Additive manufacturing metal, the art of the possible. In: Additive Manufacturing of Metals. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 7–33. [DOI]

Coffman C, Visser C, Soukup J, Peak M. Crowns and prosthodontics. In: Lobprise HB, Dodd JR, editors. Wiggs’s Veterinary Dentistry: Principles and Practice. John Wiley & Sons; 2019. pp. 387–410. [DOI]

Petruka A. Small Animal Dental, Oral & Maxillofacial Disease: A Color Handbook. Can Vet J. 2020;61:188. [PMC]

Lemmons M, Beebe D. Oral anatomy and physiology. In: Lobprise HB, Dodd JR, editors. Wiggs’s Veterinary Dentistry: Principles and Practice. John Wiley & Sons; 2019. pp. 1–24. [DOI]

10.

Pradhan SR, Singh R, Banwait SS. On 3D printing of dental crowns with direct metal laser sintering for canine. J Mech Sci Technol. 2022;36:4197–203. [DOI]

11.

Singh R, Das A, Anand A. On 3D printing of customized multi-root dental implants for the strategic tooth of canine by direct metal laser sintering. Rapid Prototyping J. 2023;29:447–59. [DOI]

12.

Wahab RDA, Azman AH. Additive manufacturing for repair and restoration in remanufacturing: an overview from object design and systems perspectives. Processes. 2019;7:802. [DOI]

13.

Vasiliev VV, Barynin VA, Razing AF. Anisogrid composite lattice structures - development and aerospace applications. Compos Struct. 2012;94:1117–27. [DOI]

14.

Seharing A, Azman AH, Abdullah S. A review on integration of lightweight gradient lattice structures in additive manufacturing parts. Adv Mech Eng. 2020;12:1687814020916951. [DOI]

15.

Brooks WC, Sutcliffe WC, Cantwell P, Fox J, Todd, Mines R. Rapid Design and Manufacture of Ultralight Cellular Materials. In: Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. SFF Symposium 2005: Proceedings of the 16th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium; 2005 Aug 1–3; Austin, US. pp. 231–41.

16.

Gümrük R, Mines RAW, Karadeniz S. Static mechanical behaviours of stainless steel micro-lattice structures under different loading conditions. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;586:392–406. [DOI]

17.

Deshpande VS, Fleck NA, Ashby MF. Effective Properties of the octet-truss lattice material. J Mech Phys Solids. 2001;49:1747–69. [DOI]

18.

Helou M, Kara S. Design, analysis and manufacturing of lattice structures: an overview. Int J Comput Integr Manuf. 2018;31:243–61. [DOI]

19.

Maloney KJ, Fink KD, Schaedler TA, Kolodziejska JA, Jacobsen AJ, Roper CS. Multifunctional heat exchangers derived from three-dimensional micro-lattice structures. Int J Heat Mass Tran. 2012;55:2486–93. [DOI]

20.

Dantas ACS, Scalabrin DH, De Farias R, Barbosa AA, Ferraz AV, Wirth C. Design of Highly Porous Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds by Conversion of 3D Printed Gypsum Structures – A Comparison Study. Proc CIRP. 2016;49:55–60. [DOI]

21.

Yoo DJ. Computer-aided porous scaffold design for tissue engineering using triply periodic minimal surfaces. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. 2011;12:61–71. [DOI]

22.

Abdulhadi HS, Mian A. Effect of strut length and orientation on elastic mechanical response of modified body-centered cubic lattice structures. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L. 2019;233:2219–33. [DOI]

23.

Li Y, Yang C, Zhao H, Qu S, Li X, Li Y. New Developments of Ti-Based Alloys for Biomedical Applications. Materials (Basel). 2014;7:1709–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

24.

Mutlu I, Oktay E. Characterization of 17-4 PH stainless steel foam for biomedical applications in simulated body fluid and artificial saliva environments. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013;33:1125–31. [DOI] [PubMed]

25.

Mutlu I, Oktay E. Influence of fluoride content of artificial saliva on metal release from 17-4 PH stainless steel foam for dental implant applications. J Mater Sci Technol. 2013;29:582–8. [DOI]

26.

Gürkan D, Sağbaş B. Additively manufactured Ti6Al4V lattice structures for biomedical applications. Int J 3D Print Technol Digital Ind. 2021;5:155–63. [DOI]

27.

Yadollahi A, Shamsaei N, Thompson SM, Elwany A, Bian L. Mechanical and microstructural properties of selective laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel. In: International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. IMECE 2015: Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition; 2015 Nov 13–19; Houston, US. ASME; 2015. [DOI]

28.

Sabooni S, Chabok A, Feng SC, Blaauw H, Pijper TC, Yang HJ, et al. Laser powder bed fusion of 17–4 PH stainless steel: A comparative study on the effect of heat treatment on the microstructure evolution and mechanical properties. Addit Manuf. 2021;46:102176. [DOI]

29.

Kalia B, Singh R, Pabla BS, Dureja M. On Direct Metal Laser Sintering of Functionally Graded Material with Virgin and Mixed Powder. Arabian J Sci Eng. 2024;49:11857–70. [DOI]