Comparison of the prediction accuracy of the optimal cut-off points

IndicesCut-off pointAUC (95% CI)SN (%)SP (%)PPV (%)NPV (%)Youden’s J statistic
FLI
Traditional< 300.735 (0.721–0.747)68.22-75.2672.2646.90
> 600.623 (0.609–0.637)-94.5383.9258.7024.55
New> 22.40.819 (0.807–0.830)79.4269.8871.4878.1349.30
HSI
Traditional< 300.668 (0.654–0.681)92.58-59.8585.3233.55
> 360.667 (0.653–0.681)-89.8380.3062.6333.43
New> 32.90.792 (0.779–0.804)73.1770.7470.3973.5043.91
FSI
Traditional> 230.701 (0.687–0.714)54.4385.7378.3866.4440.16
New> 13.60.822 (0.810–0.833)76.1373.1772.9576.3449.30
ZJU index
Traditional< 320.684 (0.670–0.697)95.87-60.6791.2436.79
> 380.667 (0.653–0.680)-91.8882.9162.2833.32
New> 34.90.826 (0.814–0.836)74.9275.3574.2975.9750.27

The hyphen (-) was used to conceal data that were not necessary in that comparison. AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; SN: sensitivity; SP: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; FLI: fatty liver index; HSI: hepatic steatosis index; FSI: Framingham Steatosis index; ZJU index: Zhejiang University index