• Open Access
    Commentary

    Navigating regulatory challenges in molecularly tailored nanomedicine

    Ajay Vikram Singh 1†*
    Preeti Bhardwaj 1†
    Aditya Kumar Upadhyay 2†
    Anselmo Pagani 3
    Jyoti Upadhyay 4
    Jolly Bhadra 5
    Veronica Tisato 6,7
    Manali Thakur 8
    Donato Gemmati 6,7
    Rudresh Mishra 9
    Paolo Zamboni 3

    Explor BioMat-X. 2024;1:124–134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37349/ebmx.2024.00009

    Received: December 08, 2023 Accepted: March 14, 2024 Published: April 25, 2024

    Academic Editor: Stephanie Willerth, University of Victoria, British

    Abstract

    Nanomedicine, a convergence of nanotechnology and medical sciences, has unleashed transformative potential in healthcare. However, harnessing the benefits of nanomedicine requires a thorough understanding of its regulatory landscape. An in-depth discussion of regulatory considerations, including molecular safety assessment, harmonization of the regulatory landscape, and shaping the future of innovation, is presented in this discourse. The molecular safety assessment entails evaluating interactions between nanoparticles and biomolecules, ensuring compatibility at the molecular level. Harmonization involves developing international standards and guidelines for a consistent regulatory approach, while shaping innovations emphasizes integrating molecular safety assessments into early stages of development. Challenges encompass the need for standardized assessment methods, balancing innovation with safety, and addressing unique features of novel molecular designs. As the nanomedicine landscape evolves, effective regulatory strategies must navigate the intricate interplay of molecules and technologies, ensuring both patient access and product safety.

    Keywords

    Nanomedicine, regulatory considerations, molecular safety assessment, harmonization, innovations, patient safety

    Introduction

    The realm of nanomedicine has ushered in a new era of healthcare, where the convergence of nanotechnology and medicine has given rise to innovative approaches that hold immense promise for improving diagnosis, treatment, and overall patient outcomes [1]. At the heart of this transformation lies the intricate interplay of key molecular players that govern the design, functionality, and therapeutic efficacy of nonmedical interventions [2]. The fusion of nanoscale science with medicine has opened up avenues previously thought to be confined to the realm of science fiction. Nanomedicine, with its tailored nanoparticles, targeted drug delivery, and precision molecular interactions, has redefined medical paradigms [3]. This introduction serves as a prelude to unraveling the pivotal role that specific molecules play in propelling these innovations [4].

    Setting the stage: nanomedicine’s revolutionary impact

    The genesis of nanomedicine can be traced back to the realization that materials and devices at the nanoscale possess unique properties that can be harnessed to address longstanding challenges in medicine [5]. The reduced dimensions at this scale result in distinctive behaviors, from enhanced surface area-to-volume ratios to quantum effects. These attributes have been strategically manipulated to engineer multifunctional nanoparticles capable of navigating biological barriers, homing in on disease sites, and releasing therapeutic payloads with precision [6, 7].

    The versatility of nanomedicine extends beyond drug delivery. Molecular imaging techniques, such as quantum dots and contrast agents, have revolutionized diagnostic accuracy by offering molecular-level insights into cellular and tissue processes [8]. Furthermore, the emergence of RNA-based nanomedicine, including small interfering RNA (siRNA) and messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics, has brought gene silencing and editing to the forefront of disease intervention [9]. The Table 1 below presents a molecular toolbox for nanomedicine, including molecules that harness immune responses, modulate genetic expression, and mimic natural signaling pathways. The molecules listed are associated with their respective applications in the context of nanomedicine, as supported by the provided search results.

    Molecular toolbox for nanomedicine

    MoleculesImmune responsesGenetic expressionSignaling pathways
    Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle probesUsed in immune cell labeling and trackingCan modulate genetic expression when functionalized with specific ligandsCan mimic natural signaling pathways when designed to target specific receptor
    Nanoscale delivery systemsCan be engineered to modulate immune responses for targeted therapyHave the potential to modulate genetic expression for therapeutic purposeCan be designed to mimic natural signaling pathways for targeted drug delivery
    Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas systemUsed for molecular detection in immune-related researchCan be employed to modulate genetic expression through gene editingUtilized to study and manipulate natural signaling pathways within cells
    Display full size

    Role of key molecules in driving nanomedicine innovations

    Central to the success of nanomedicine are the key molecules that orchestrate its intricate dance. From lipids and polymers forming the foundation of nanoparticle carriers to antibodies and ligands guiding their specific interactions, these molecules function as the architects of therapeutic precision [10, 11]. The narrative of nanomedicine is woven from the threads of molecular recognition, binding kinetics, and cellular uptake—each influenced by the intricate chemistry and physics governing these entities [12].

    This commentary embarks on a journey to decipher the molecular intricacies driving nanomedicine’s progress. It investigates the multifaceted interactions between nanoparticles and biomolecules, highlights the molecular design principles underpinning personalized therapies, and explores the evolving regulatory landscape governing these molecularly tailored interventions [13].

    In the following sections, this perspective paper will navigate through the molecular landscapes of nanoparticle carriers, bioconjugation strategies, and the dynamic interface between nanotechnology and molecular biology [14]. Through this exploration, research community hopes to shed light on the essence of nanomedicine as an interdisciplinary endeavor where the synergy of molecules at the nanoscale converges with the intricacies of human biology, forging a path towards transformative medical solutions [15]. The Figure 1 presents a molecular toolkit where artificial intelligence (AI) could be instrumental for future nanomedicine designed for grasping the bio-physicochemical characteristics at the interface between nanomaterials and biology [16]. This model aims to enhance understanding by predicting key nanomaterial properties that influence interactions with biological systems. Once suitable nanomaterial properties are chosen, it is crucial to employ real experimental data for the development, fine-tuning, and validation of machine learning (ML) models before one can make predictions about unfamiliar nanomaterial properties or their interactions with biological entities. The radial outlines on the right panel signify the areas where AI and ML techniques can be applied to forecast unfamiliar properties, enabling one to predict toxicity and health effects in the field of nanomedicine.

    Schematic Illustration an AI toolbox for comprehending the nano-bio interface’s bio-physicochemical identity. The model predicts nanomaterial properties affecting nano-bio interactions. Real experimental data is crucial for developing, optimizing, and validating ML models before predicting unfamiliar nanomaterial properties and their interactions, particularly in nanomedicine’s toxicity and health effects [17]

    Note. Reprinted from “Artificial intelligence and machine learning empower advanced biomedical material design to toxicity prediction,” by Singh AV, Rosenkranz D, Ansari MHD, Singh R, Kanase A, Singh SP, et al. Adv Intell Syst. 2020;2:2000084 (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/aisy.202000084). CC BY.

    Nanoparticles as therapeutic carriers

    Nanoparticles, as carriers of therapeutic payloads, represent a cornerstone of modern nanomedicine. These minute entities, often measured in nanometers, have redefined drug delivery by harnessing the power of molecules and materials at the nanoscale. This section researches into the intricate world of nanoparticle carriers, highlighting their design, functionality, and impact on therapeutic outcomes [18].

    Lipid-based nanocarriers: a molecular dance for drug delivery

    Lipid-based nanoparticles have emerged as versatile carriers in the nanomedicine landscape. Comprising lipids and phospholipids, these nanoparticles mimic cellular membranes and offer a unique molecular interface for drug encapsulation and delivery [19, 20]. Liposomes, for instance, bilayered lipid vesicles, have been instrumental in delivering a diverse range of therapeutics, from chemotherapeutic agents to genetic materials [21, 22]. The molecular arrangement of lipids enables controlled release, enhancing the therapeutic window and minimizing off-target effects [23, 24].

    Polymer nanoparticles: tailoring molecular structures for enhanced efficacy

    Polymer-based nanoparticles have revolutionized drug delivery by affording precise control over their size, shape, and surface properties [25]. The meticulous selection of polymers and their molecular architecture governs drug loading, release kinetics, and interactions with biological systems. Co-polymeric structures, such as micelles and dendrimers, exhibit tunable properties, enabling the formulation of therapeutics that exhibit extended circulation times and preferential accumulation in disease sites. The molecular diversity of polymers allows for tailoring nanoparticles for specific disease contexts and patient profiles [26].

    Inorganic nanoparticles: harnessing molecular properties for precision medicine

    Inorganic nanoparticles, often composed of metals, semiconductors, or metal oxides, bring molecular properties to the forefront. Quantum effects, plasmonic resonance, and surface-enhanced properties are harnessed to create nanoparticles with unique optical and electronic signatures [27]. Gold nanoparticles, for instance, exhibit surface plasmon resonance that can be tuned to absorb and scatter light, enabling applications in both diagnostics and therapeutics [28]. Their interactions with biomolecules are governed by molecular affinity, shaping their behavior in biological environments [29].

    As nanomedicine journeys through the molecular landscapes of these nanoparticle carriers, it becomes evident that their functionality is underpinned by the intricate dance of molecules at the nanoscale [30]. Whether it’s the molecular assembly of lipids, the tailored architecture of polymers, or the molecular properties of inorganic materials, the interplay of molecules orchestrates the delivery of therapeutics with unprecedented precision [31, 32]. This molecular symphony, conducted on the nanoscale, exemplifies the convergence of scientific disciplines that defines the essence of nanomedicine [33].

    Bioconjugation and targeting strategies

    In the intricate world of nanomedicine, the ability to precisely guide nanoparticles to their intended destinations within the body is a testament to the remarkable interplay of molecules. This section unveils the strategic art of bioconjugation and targeting strategies—integral facets that bridge the molecular precision of nanoparticles with the dynamic landscape of cellular interactions [34]. On the role of key molecules in driving nanomedicine innovations, it is essential to underscore the pivotal role played by molecular design in shaping the transformative landscape of nanomedicine. Key molecules, such as nanoparticles and biomolecules, serve as the foundation for the development of innovative drug delivery systems, diagnostic tools, and therapeutic interventions [12]. The judicious selection and engineering of these key molecules enable precise targeting, controlled release, and enhanced therapeutic efficacy. Moreover, understanding the intricate interactions between nanoparticles and biomolecules is crucial for ensuring molecular safety and efficacy. Advances in nanomedicine hinge on the ability to harness the unique properties of key molecules, emphasizing the need for a thorough exploration of their roles in driving innovations [2]. This nuanced perspective enables a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular intricacies that underpin the progress of nanomedicine and aligns with the overarching theme of navigating regulatory challenges in the field.

    Ligand functionalization of nanoparticles: interplay of molecules for specificity

    Ligand functionalization stands as a prime example of molecular ingenuity in nanomedicine. By tethering specific molecules—ligands—to the surface of nanoparticles, researchers have unlocked the potential for selective targeting. These ligands, often antibodies, peptides, or aptamers, bind to receptors on the surface of target cells with exquisite specificity. This molecular interaction not only enhances cellular internalization but also offers a means to tailor therapeutic interventions for individual patients or disease subtypes [35]. The molecular compatibility between ligands and receptors is the linchpin in this strategy, dictating the success of nanoparticle homing.

    Antibody-drug conjugates: marrying molecular recognition with therapeutic payloads

    Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) epitomize the fusion of molecular recognition and therapeutic delivery. Here, monoclonal antibodies serve as molecular vehicles, selectively binding to antigens on cancer cells. Once bound, the ADCs internalize, releasing potent cytotoxic payloads that specifically target cancerous cells [36]. The synergy of molecular recognition and therapeutic payload delivery minimizes collateral damage to healthy tissues, making ADCs a paradigm-shifting approach in oncology. The precision of this strategy lies in the specific pairing of antibodies with their antigenic targets.

    It’s important to note that the regulatory landscape for nanomedicine is continually evolving as the field progresses, and the challenges mentioned above represent just a snapshot of the complex considerations involved in ensuring the safe and effective use of nanomedicine products as mentioned above in Table 2.

    Summarizes the key aspects related to regulatory considerations in the field of nanomedicine

    Regulatory aspectDescription
    Molecular safety assessment

    • Evaluation of the potential interactions between nanoparticles and biomolecules at the molecular level.

    • Assessment of potential cytotoxicity, immunogenicity, and unintended molecular effects [37].

    • Characterization of nanoparticle behavior in biological environments to ensure molecular compatibility.

    Harmonizing regulatory landscape

    • Developing international standards for the evaluation and approval of nanomedicine products.

    • Establishing consistent guidelines for molecular safety assessment, efficacy evaluation, and quality control.

    • Collaboration between regulatory agencies to streamline approval processes for cross-border nanomedicine products.

    Shaping future nanomedicine innovations

    • Incorporating molecular safety assessments into the early stages of nanomedicine development.

    • Encouraging industry collaboration to share molecular safety data and foster responsible innovation.

    • Designing regulatory frameworks that adapt to the rapidly evolving nature of nanomedicine innovations.

    Regulatory challenges

    • Lack of standardized methods for evaluating molecular interactions and safety at the nanoscale.

    • Balancing the need for patient access to innovative nanomedicine products with robust safety assessments.

    • Addressing the unique challenges posed by multifunctional nanoparticles and novel molecular designs.

    • Ensuring that regulatory agencies have the expertise and capacity to evaluate nanomedicine products effectively.

    Display full size

    Peptide targeting: molecular keys to unlock cellular entry and targeted therapy

    Peptides, short sequences of amino acids, have proven themselves as molecular keys that unlock cellular entry for nanoparticles. These bioactive sequences hold the potential to interact with specific cellular receptors, facilitating internalization via different exposure routes [38, 39]. Furthermore, peptides can be tailored to interact with enzymes present in disease microenvironments, triggering localized therapeutic release. The molecular interactions between peptides and their cognate receptors are fundamental to their targeting efficiency and therapeutic efficacy [40].

    As nanomedicine progresses into these molecular intricacies, it becomes clear that the success of nanomedicine hinges on the precise orchestration of molecular recognition events. The choice of ligands, the affinity of antibodies, and the specificity of peptides—each decision is a molecular brushstroke on the canvas of targeted therapeutic interventions [41]. This section underscores the notion that molecular interactions, guided by design and propelled by understanding, lie at the core of nanomedical achievements, shaping the future of medicine with unprecedented accuracy [42].

    Conclusions

    Pioneering future advances in nanomedicine

    The journey through the intricate realm of nanomedicine has unveiled a landscape where molecules, both in their individual capacities and orchestrated collaborations, play a central role in redefining the boundaries of medical innovation [17]. This exploration of key molecular players in nanomedicine has shed light on the fundamental mechanisms that underpin the transformative potential of this field. As nanomedicine stands at this juncture, it is evident that the synergy of nanotechnology and molecular biology holds the promise of revolutionary advancements in healthcare [43]. Looking forward, several avenues beckon research community to further expand the horizons of nanomedicine, including robotics, AI and technological innovations [44].

    Tailored molecular designs for personalized medicine

    The future of nanomedicine lies in the convergence of molecular insights with patient-centric care. Customized therapies, crafted with molecular precision, will harness genetic and molecular profiles to design interventions that are uniquely suited to individual patients [45, 46]. The era of one-size-fits-all treatments will give way to personalized approaches, where the interplay of molecules guides therapy selection, dosing, and duration assisted by digital revolution, AI and ML [47, 48].

    Molecular diagnostics and theranostics

    Advances in molecular imaging and diagnostics will continue to empower clinicians with the ability to visualize disease processes at the molecular level. This molecular understanding will drive the development of theranostic strategies, where diagnostics and therapeutics are seamlessly integrated into a unified approach. Nanoparticles armed with both imaging agents and therapeutic payloads will enable real-time monitoring and adaptive interventions, maximizing treatment efficacy while minimizing side effects, molecular imaging [49, 50].

    Emerging molecules in nanomedicine

    The exploration of nanomedicine’s future frontiers brings to light the potential of novel molecules and materials. From aptamers that mimic antibodies to emerging nanomaterials with unique properties, the palette of molecules available for nanomedical designs will diversify. The molecular toolbox will expand to include molecules that harness immune responses, modulate genetic expression, and mimic natural signaling pathways [51].

    Collaboration across disciplines

    The potential of nanomedicine’s future hinges on interdisciplinary collaboration between doctors, data engineer to boost the advanced application of AI and ML [6, 17, 35, 52]. The cross-pollination of molecular biology, materials science, engineering, and clinical medicine will propel towards groundbreaking solutions [53]. In this era of convergence, experts from various domains will collectively unravel the molecular intricacies, creating a holistic understanding that accelerates innovation [54]. In conclusion, the interplay of molecules, driven by insights from nanotechnology and molecular biology, will continue to redefine the landscape of healthcare [55]. As research community chart a course into the future, it is imperative that researchers, clinicians, and policymakers come together to harness the potential of these key molecular players [56]. Through this collaboration, researchers can unravel the full spectrum of possibilities offered by nanomedicine, and in doing so, pave the way for a new era of precision medicine that is both molecularly informed and patient-centric [5759].

    To further enhance the molecularly tailored nanomedicine core concept, a nuanced emphasis on the dynamic role of emerging molecules in nanomedicine could be beneficial. The evolving landscape introduces not only innovative materials but also novel molecular entities, such as aptamers and advanced nanomaterials, each contributing uniquely to the expanding molecular toolbox [17]. Delving deeper into these emerging molecules and their specific applications could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the diverse avenues opening up in nanomedical designs. Additionally, future research highlighting how these molecules address current challenges or pave the way for innovative therapeutic modalities would strengthen the molecular nanomedicine emphasis on pioneering future advances. By offering a more detailed exploration of the potential applications of these emerging molecules, the conclusion of research viewpoint paper provides a richer perspective on the intricate interplay of molecules driving the ongoing revolution in nanomedicine.

    Abbreviations

    ADCs:

    antibody-drug conjugates

    AI:

    artificial intelligence

    ML:

    machine learning

    Declarations

    Author Contributions

    AVS, PB, and AKU equally contributed to: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. AP, JU, and JB: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. VT, DG, and MT: Validation, Writing—review & editing, Supervision. RM and PZ: Supervision, Project administration. All authors read and approved the submitted version.

    Conflicts of interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

    Ethical approval

    Not applicable.

    Consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent to publication

    Not applicable.

    Availability of data and materials

    The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon request.

    Funding

    This study was funded by the application of multivalent biomineralized nanostructures as a modular strategy for targeting colorectal cancer [CDIRCC-2024-468] by Qatar University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

    Copyright

    © The Author(s) 2024.

    References

    Riehemann K, Schneider SW, Luger TA, Godin B, Ferrari M, Fuchs H. Nanomedicine—challenge and perspectives. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48:872−97. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Hassan S, Singh AV. Biophysicochemical perspective of nanoparticle compatibility: a critically ignored parameter in nanomedicine. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2014;14:402−14. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Singh AV, Ansari MHD, Laux P, Luch A. Micro-nanorobots: important considerations when developing novel drug delivery platforms. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2019;16:1259−75. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Rai M, Singh AV, Paudel N, Kanase A, Falletta E, Kerkar P, et al. Herbal concoction unveiled: a computational analysis of phytochemicals’ pharmacokinetic and toxicological profiles using novel approach methodologies (NAMs). Curr Res Toxicol. 2023;5:100118. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Singh AV, Chandrasekar V, Laux P, Luch A, Dakua SP, Zamboni P, et al. Micropatterned neurovascular interface to mimic the blood−brain barrier’s neurophysiology and micromechanical function: a BBB-on-chip model. Cells. 2022;11:2801. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Singh AV, Chandrasekar V, Janapareddy P, Mathews DE, Laux P, Luch A, et al. Emerging application of nanorobotics and artificial intelligence to cross the BBB: advances in design, controlled maneuvering, and targeting of the barriers. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2021;12:1835−53. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Ansari MY, Chandrasekar V, Singh AV, Dakua SP. Re-routing drugs to blood brain barrier: a comprehensive analysis of machine learning approaches with fingerprint amalgamation and data balancing. IEEE Access. 2023;11:9890−906.
    Zhang X, Centurion F, Misra A, Patel S, Gu Z. Molecularly targeted nanomedicine enabled by inorganic nanoparticles for atherosclerosis diagnosis and treatment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;194:114709. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Salvatori F, D’Aversa E, Serino ML, Singh AV, Secchiero P, Zauli G, et al. miRNAs epigenetic tuning of wall remodeling in the early phase after myocardial infarction: a novel epidrug approach. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:13268. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Singh SL, Chauhan K, Bharadwaj AS, Kishore V, Laux P, Luch A, et al. Polymer translocation and nanopore sequencing: a review of advances and challenges. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:6153. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Dwivedi M, Singh SL, Bharadwaj AS, Kishore V, Singh AV. Self-assembly of DNA-grafted colloids: a review of challenges. Micromachines (Basel). 2022;13:1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Patra JK, Das G, Fraceto LF, Campos EVR, Rodriguez-Torres MDP, Acosta-Torres LS, et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects. J Nanobiotechnology. 2018;16:71. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Mahon E, Salvati A, Baldelli Bombelli F, Lynch I, Dawson KA. Designing the nanoparticle-biomolecule interface for “targeting and therapeutic delivery”. J Control Release. 2012;161:164−74. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Singh AV, Kayal A, Malik A, Maharjan RS, Dietrich P, Thissen A, et al. Interfacial water in the SARS spike protein: investigating the interaction with human ACE2 receptor and in vitro uptake in A549 cells. Langmuir. 2022;38:7976−88. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Decuzzi P, Peer D, Mascolo DD, Palange AL, Manghnani PN, Moghimi SM, et al. Roadmap on nanomedicine. Nanotechnology. 2021;32:012001. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Saallah S, Lenggoro IW. Nanoparticles carrying biological molecules: recent advances and applications. KONA Powder Part J. 2018;35:89−111. [DOI]
    Singh AV, Rosenkranz D, Ansari MHD, Singh R, Kanase A, Singh SP, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning empower advanced biomedical material design to toxicity prediction. Adv Intell Syst. 2020;2:2000084. [DOI]
    Mudshinge SR, Deore AB, Patil S, Bhalgat CM. Nanoparticles: emerging carriers for drug delivery. Saudi Pharm J. 2011;19:129−41. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Tripathi D, Ray P, Singh AV, Kishore V, Singh SL. Durability of slippery liquid-infused surfaces: challenges and advances. Coatings. 2023;13:1095. [DOI]
    Lu H, Zhang S, Wang J, Chen Q. A Review on polymer and lipid-based nanocarriers and its application to nano-pharmaceutical and food-based systems. Front Nutr. 2021;8:783831. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Singh AV, Hosseinidoust Z, Park BW, Yasa O, Sitti M. Microemulsion-based soft bacteria-driven microswimmers for active cargo delivery. ACS Nano. 2017;11:9759−69. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Kumar R, Dkhar DS, Kumari R, Divya, Mahapatra S, Dubey VK, et al. Lipid based nanocarriers: production techniques, concepts, and commercialization aspect. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 2022;74:103526. [DOI]
    Tenchov R, Bird R, Curtze AE, Zhou Q. Lipid nanoparticles─from liposomes to mrna vaccine delivery, a landscape of research diversity and advancement. ACS Nano. 2021;15:16982−7015. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Plaza-Oliver M, Santander-Ortega MJ, Lozano MV. Current approaches in lipid-based nanocarriers for oral drug delivery. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2021;11:471−97. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Singh AV, Laux P, Luch A, Sudrik C, Wiehr S, Wild AM, et al. Review of emerging concepts in nanotoxicology: opportunities and challenges for safer nanomaterial design. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2019;29:378−87. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Herdiana Y, Wathoni N, Shamsuddin S, Muchtaridi M. Scale-up polymeric-based nanoparticles drug delivery systems: development and challenges. OpenNano. 2022;7:100048. [DOI]
    Singh AV, Alapan Y, Jahnke T, Laux P, Luch A, Aghakhani A, et al. Seed-mediated synthesis of plasmonic gold nanoribbons using cancer cells for hyperthermia applications. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6:7573−81. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Singh AV, Jahnke T, Wang S, Xiao Y, Alapan Y, Kharratian S, et al. Anisotropic gold nanostructures: optimization via in silico modeling for hyperthermia. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2018;1:6205−16. [DOI]
    Singh AV, Jahnke T, Kishore V, Park BW, Batuwangala M, Bill J, et al. Cancer cells biomineralize ionic gold into nanoparticles-microplates via secreting defense proteins with specific gold-binding peptides. Acta Biomater. 2018;71:61−71. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Su S, M Kang P. Recent advances in nanocarrier-assisted therapeutics delivery systems. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:837. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Zielińska A, Carreiró F, Oliveira AM, Neves A, Pires B, Venkatesh DN, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles: production, characterization, toxicology and ecotoxicology. Molecules. 2020;25:3731. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Begines B, Ortiz T, Pérez-Aranda M, Martínez G, Merinero M, Argüelles-Arias F, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery: recent developments and future prospects. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020;10:1403. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Chandrasekar V, Singh AV, Maharjan RS, Dakua SP, Balakrishnan S, Dash S, et al. Perspectives on the technological aspects and biomedical applications of virus-like particles/nanoparticles in reproductive biology: insights on the medicinal and toxicological outlook. Adv NanoBiomed Res. 2022;2:2200010. [DOI]
    Valcourt DM, Harris J, Riley RS, Dang M, Wang J, Day ES. Advances in targeted nanotherapeutics: from bioconjugation to biomimicry. Nano Res. 2018;11:4999−5016. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Singh AV, Maharjan RS, Kanase A, Siewert K, Rosenkranz D, Singh R, et al. Machine-learning-based approach to decode the influence of nanomaterial properties on their interaction with cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13:1943−55. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Cremers GAO, Rosier BJHM, Meijs A, Tito NB, van Duijnhoven SMJ, van Eenennaam H, et al. Determinants of ligand-functionalized DNA nanostructure–cell interactions. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143:10131−42. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Bhatti R, Shakeel H, Malik K, Qasim M, Khan MA, Ahmed N, et al. Inorganic nanoparticles: toxic effects, mechanisms of cytotoxicity and phytochemical interactions. Adv Pharm Bull. 2022;12:757−62. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Singh AV, Romeo A, Scott K, Wagener S, Leibrock L, Laux P, et al. Emerging technologies for in vitro inhalation toxicology. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10:2100633. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Singh AV, Maharjan RS, Kromer C, Laux P, Luch A, Vats T, et al. Advances in smoking related in vitro inhalation toxicology: a perspective case of challenges and opportunities from progresses in lung-on-chip technologies. Chem Res Toxicol. 2021;34:1984−2002. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Sadremomtaz A, Al-Dahmani ZM, Ruiz-Moreno AJ, Monti A, Wang C, Azad T, et al. Synthetic peptides that antagonize the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2) interaction with SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding spike protein. J Med Chem. 2022;65:2836−47. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Vadevoo SMP, Gurung S, Lee HS, Gunassekaran GR, Lee SM, Yoon JW, et al. Peptides as multifunctional players in cancer therapy. Exp Mol Med. 2023;55:1099−109. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Ng KK, Zheng G. Molecular interactions in organic nanoparticles for phototheranostic applications. Chem Rev. 2015;115:11012−42. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Maleki R, Rezvantalab S, Shahbazi MA. Role of molecular simulation in the future of nanomedicine. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2021;16:2133−6. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Singh AV, Laux P, Luch A, Balkrishnan S, Dakua SP. Bottom-UP assembly of nanorobots: extending synthetic biology to complex material design. Front Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2019;5:1−2. [DOI]
    Govender R, Abrahmsén-Alami S, Larsson A, Folestad S. Therapy for the individual: towards patient integration into the manufacturing and provision of pharmaceuticals. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2020;149:58−76. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Alghamdi MA, Fallica AN, Virzì N, Kesharwani P, Pittalà V, Greish K. The promise of nanotechnology in personalized medicine. J Pers Med. 2022;12:673. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Singh AV, Varma M, Laux P, Choudhary S, Datusalia AK, Gupta N, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning disciplines with the potential to improve the nanotoxicology and nanomedicine fields: a comprehensive review. Arch Toxicol. 2023;97:963−79. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Singh AV, Bansod G, Mahajan M, Dietrich P, Singh SP, Rav K, et al. Digital transformation in toxicology: improving communication and efficiency in risk assessment. ACS Omega. 2023;8:21377−90. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Singh AV, Dad Ansari MH, Dayan CB, Giltinan J, Wang S, Yu Y, et al. Multifunctional magnetic hairbot for untethered osteogenesis, ultrasound contrast imaging and drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2019;219:119394. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Singh AV, Jungnickel H, Leibrock L, Tentschert J, Reichardt P, Katz A, et al. ToF-SIMS 3D imaging unveils important insights on the cellular microenvironment during biomineralization of gold nanostructures. Sci Rep. 2020;10:261. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Malik S, Muhammad K, Waheed Y. Nanotechnology: a revolution in modern industry. Molecules. 2023;28:661. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Singh AV, Ansari MHD, Rosenkranz D, Maharjan RS, Kriegel FL, Gandhi K, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in computational nanotoxicology: unlocking and empowering nanomedicine. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9:e1901862. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Tsai-hsuan Ku S. Forming interdisciplinary expertise: one organization’s journey on the road to translational nanomedicine. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2012;4:366−77. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Löffler B. Editorial: moving towards interdisciplinary collaboration in clinical nanomedicine. Eur J Nanomed. 2008;1:3−5. [DOI]
    Kulkarni PG, Paudel N, Magar S, Santilli MF, Kashyap S, Baranwal AK, et al. Overcoming challenges and innovations in orthopedic prosthesis design: an interdisciplinary perspective. Biomed Mater Devices. 2024;2:58−69. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Rai M, Paudel N, Sakhrie M, Gemmati D, Khan IA, Tisato V, et al. Perspective on quantitative structure−toxicity relationship (qstr) models to predict hepatic biotransformation of xenobiotics. Livers. 2023;3:448−62. [DOI]
    Fornaguera C, García-Celma MJ. Personalized nanomedicine: a revolution at the nanoscale. J Pers Med. 2017;7:12. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Singh AV, Shelar A, Rai M, Laux P, Thakur M, Donskyi I, et al. Harmonizing risks and rewards: nano-QSAR for agricultural nanomaterials. J Agric Food Chem. 2024;72:2835−52. Erratum in: J Agric Food Chem. 2024;72:8284. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Singh AV, Varma M, Rai M, Singh SP, Bansod G, Laux P, et al. Advancing predictive risk assessment of chemicals via integrating machine learning, computational modeling, and chemical/nano-quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches. Adv Intell Syst. 2024:2300366. [DOI]