Cutaneous reactions present a diagnostic challenge, mainly when multiple factors, such as infections, medications, and environmental triggers, contribute to the clinical picture. Erythema multiforme (EM) is an acute, self-limiting mucocutaneous disorder that is most commonly triggered by herpes simplex virus (HSV) but can also be associated with drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions. Diagnosing EM becomes even more complex in patients taking photosensitizing medications, such as doxycycline, which can cause phototoxic or photoallergic reactions. Differentiating between drug-induced and infection-associated EM, as well as distinguishing it from more severe conditions like Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), is crucial for appropriate management. This case report presents a case of a 57-year-old Caucasian female with a history of penicillin allergy who developed a phototoxic reaction to doxycycline following sun exposure. She was treated with silver sulfadiazine for her skin lesions but subsequently developed EM, with target-like lesions predominantly on the legs and a concurrent herpes simplex labialis infection. Laboratory findings were unremarkable, and there was no mucosal involvement. Given the suspected drug-induced nature of the reaction and the presence of HSV, a cautious approach was taken. Treatment with oral prednisone led to the resolution of symptoms without recurrence. Patch testing for doxycycline and silver sulfadiazine was omitted due to the risk of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) and their non-essential status. Instead, penicillin testing was prioritized due to its clinical importance, and the patient successfully passed the oral amoxicillin challenge. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of differentiating between drug-induced, infection-triggered, and photosensitivity-related cutaneous reactions. A careful evaluation of medication history, infection status, and clinical presentation is essential to guide the management of this condition.

Immune response, inflammation, and lipid metabolism have important effects on cancer development and progression. Several proteins in tumoral cells and/or tumor microenvironment are involved in any of these processes, whereas some of them participate in all three, such as the zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) protein. This protein has been proposed to have an important role in invasion and metastasis of cancer cells, as well as to be involved in malignant transformation and resistance to cancer treatments. So, in this study, we present the participation of ZEB1 in immune, inflammatory, and membrane remodeling (lipid metabolism) processes, as well as its interaction with proteins that participate in them. Due to the importance of ZEB1 in cancer progression, it may be a potential biomarker of cancer prognosis and a target for the development of new cancer therapies.

In hematological malignancies, autologous immunotherapy with T lymphocytes expressing a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) has been successfully applied. CAR enhances the immuno-cellular effector system directly against cells expressing target antigens. The objective here was to discuss the prospects of applying CAR-T and its variants in autoimmune diseases (AIDs) to deplete pathogenic autoantibodies by eliminating B lymphocytes and plasma cells. B cells play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AID through the production of autoantibodies, cytokine dysregulation, antigen presentation, and regulatory dysfunction. In AID with numerous autoreactive clones against various autoantigens, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis, myositis, and systemic sclerosis, CAR-T targeting CD19/CD20 and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) have shown success in preclinical and clinical studies, representing an innovative option for refractory patients when standard treatments fail. The suppression of B lymphocytes reactive against specific antigens using cytolytic T cells carrying a chimeric autoantibody receptor (CAAR-T) offers a promising approach for managing various AIDs, especially those with characterized pathogenic autoantibodies, such as pemphigus vulgaris, myasthenia gravis, and anti-NMDAR autoimmune encephalitis. CAAR-T allows the elimination of autoreactive B lymphocytes without compromising the general functionality of the immune system, minimizing common side effects in general immunosuppressive therapies, including immunobiologicals and CAR-T. In vitro, preclinical, and clinical (phase 1) studies have demonstrated the efficacy and specificity of CAR-T and CAAR-T in several AIDs; however, extensive clinical trials (phase 3) are required to assess their safety and clinical applicability. These advances promise to enhance precision medicine in the management of AIDs, offering personalized treatments for individual patients.

Wound healing is an area of growing importance in the healthcare field, especially chronic wounds associated with comorbidities like diabetes mellitus (DM), hypoxic stress, obesity, and malnutrition. Chronic wounds significantly increase healthcare costs and reduce patients’ quality of life. Cytokines are a promising therapeutic target, as they regulate all stages of wound healing, and dysfunction in cytokine production can cause inflammatory non-healing wounds. Interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) facilitate leukocyte recruitment and clear dead cells during the initial inflammation stage while transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), IL-4, and IL-13 inhibit inflammation and stimulate proliferation of fibroblasts to begin extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition. Given the complexity of cytokine interactions and their diverse cellular targets, a comprehensive understanding of these signaling pathways is crucial. This review examines the multifaceted roles of cytokines in wound healing and discusses recent advancements in the therapeutic application of cytokine modulation for improved wound care outcomes. Despite significant advancements in improving the specificity of cytokine therapies, further research is needed to focus on targeting downstream signaling pathways or specific receptors to minimize the adverse effects associated with these treatments.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infected individuals showed either mild symptoms or were paucisymptomatic, with severe impact on human health, revealing heightened risk and direct effects on health. Among various factors contributing to complications, bacterial and fungal co-infection remains very common and is highly lethal. This narrative review aims to focus on the collective role of gut microbiota and mycobiota in COVID-19. Fungal infection has been identified as a key risk factor for the spread of COVID-19 and mortality. Gut mycobiomes diversity and abundance also vary due to the different types of SARS-CoV-2 variant infection. Their cross-talk plays a vital role in immune regulation and disease severity, with an emphasis on understanding the altered condition as a predictive marker. On the other hand, the gut microbiome is well known for shaping metabolic functions, generating immune responses, and deciphering the signal to decide the healthy state and disease condition of an individual. Immune response during COVID-19 infection was also linked with metabolites produced by the gut microflora, specifically amino acids, sugar metabolites, and neurotransmitters. The cross-talk between gut microbiota and gut mycobiota for clinical implications in terms of early detection, identification of the disease severity, and even therapeutic alternatives will open newer avenues. A deep dive understanding of the cross-talk between the microbiome and mycobiome, and their role in immune response will take scientific discovery knowledge to develop gut-targeted safe therapeutic approaches in the form of FMT (fecal microbiota transplantation) probiotics, peptides, antibacterial, and antifungal metabolites. Overall cross-talk and immune interplay are critical determinants of host immunity, providing insights into their role and key take home lessons for better management of crisis in the future.

Nociplastic pain is the fourth category of pain defined in recent years. It is a pain arising from altered nociception, despite the lack of clear evidence of actual or threatened tissue damage that causes activation of peripheral nociceptors nor evidence for disease or lesion of the somatosensory system causing the pain. This type of pain is usually multifocal, more diffuse or intense than expected and it is usually associated with other central nervous system-derived symptoms, such as fatigue, sleep, memory, and mood problems. It can occur in isolation or as part of a mixed-pain state in combination with ongoing nociceptive or neuropathic pain. It is associated with increased social and sanitary costs due to the difficulty of adequately treating it. Its pathogenesis is still poorly understood, even if a mounting body of evidence suggests a pivotal role in inflammation and immunity, which may be triggered by an infection and/or a trauma. This narrative review aims to summarise the current knowledge about the interplay of the immune system and nociplastic pathways activation and amplification. The challenge for the future will be to identify the exact role of inflammation and immunity, the cause of this activation, and its link to other pathogenetic factors of nociplastic pain, such as diet or microbiota alteration, social and phycological factors, together with a genetic and epigenetic predisposition.

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest malignant tumor in the female reproductive system. Despite advancements in standard treatments such as tumor debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy, the overall survival rate remains low. The emergence of targeted therapies, including Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents, has provided new avenues for treatment. However, drug resistance and disease heterogeneity continue to pose significant challenges. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as an emerging therapeutic approach, primarily target the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) pathways to restore anti-tumor immune responses. Although ICIs have shown significant efficacy in other malignancies, their effectiveness in ovarian cancer is limited, with a response rate of only 10–15% for monotherapy. Recent studies have focused on combining ICIs with chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents, or PARP inhibitors to enhance therapeutic outcomes. This article reviews the progress of ICIs in ovarian cancer, including monotherapy and combination treatment strategies, and explores emerging therapeutic targets and strategies aimed at improving patient prognosis and achieving personalized treatment. By gaining a deeper understanding of the tumor microenvironment and its immune evasion mechanisms, there is hope for developing more effective treatment options in the future, ultimately improving the survival rates and quality of life for ovarian cancer patients.

The efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy may not match initial expectations due to the influence of multiple circumstances, some of which cannot be predicted. CAR-T treatment groups include high-risk patients, particularly those with TP53 mutations. A significant body of research has demonstrated that mutations in the TP53 gene play a pivotal role in cancer development and progression. Any aberration in the TP53 gene in cancer is invariably associated with complications and a poor prognosis. Moreover, mutations in the TP53 gene have been observed to correlate with resistance to conventional chemotherapy, prompting the use of alternative therapeutic approaches, including CAR-T therapy. However, there is a possibility that abnormalities in the TP53 gene may affect patients after CAR-T cell administration reducing the efficacy of therapy. This review examines the link between TP53 mutations in cancer and the efficacy of CAR-T therapy, as well as the potential implications of this aspect in therapeutic planning.

Cancer-related pain represents one of the most common complaints of cancer patients especially for those with advanced-stage of disease and/or bone metastases. More effective therapeutic strategies are needed not only to improve the survival of cancer patients but also to relieve cancer-related pain. In the last decade, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) has revolutionized cancer care. Beyond its anticancer role, PD-1/PD-L1 axis pathway is involved in many other physiological processes. PD-L1 expression is found in both malignant tissues and normal tissues including the dorsal root ganglion, and spinal cord. Through its interaction with PD-1, PD-L1 can modulate neuron excitability, leading to the suppression of inflammatory, neuropathic, and bone cancer pain. Therefore, since the intricate relationship between immunotherapy and pain should be largely dissected, this comprehensive review explores the complex relationship between PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy and cancer-related pain. It delves into the potential mechanisms through which PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy might modulate pain pathways, including neuroinflammation, neuromodulation, opioid mechanisms, and bone processes. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing future research directions in order to optimize pain management strategies in cancer patients. Finally, this article discusses the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in advancing research and clinical practice in this context. AI-based strategies, such as analyzing large datasets and creating predictive models, can identify patterns and correlations between PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and pain. These tools can assist healthcare providers in tailoring treatment plans and pain management strategies to individual patients, ultimately improving outcomes and quality of life for those undergoing PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy.

The tripartite network, including the nervous, immune, and endocrine systems, plays a significant role in regulatory and effector processes in the male body. On the one hand, males perform their reproduction function by generating spermatozoa in conditions of self-tolerance maintenance because most spermatozoa antigens (“sequestrated antigens”) are unknown to the immune system. On the other hand, in everyday life, a male body encounters hostile external infections, some of which colonize the skin and barrier surfaces and present a cancer threat to male genital tracts. This is human papillomavirus (HPV), the “silent killer”. Therefore, the male immune system has to function in a contradictory situation using either active immune responses, self-tolerance mechanisms, or both simultaneously. This review focused on the functional organization of the male immune system, including its coordination with the nervous and endocrine systems, and immune processes at the level of the whole organism, as well as on obvious changes, which have currently happened. The male immune system should function in conditions of the strong influence of testosterone and biosocial impulses coming from the nervous system. In the last century, researchers obtained data showing a decrease in the male reproduction function because of a stable negative dynamic of spermatozoa count and quality. Nowadays, depressing statistical indicators of male fertility have been published. 15% of couples are unable to conceive a child, where 50% of the causes of infertility relate to males, and up to 15% of male infertility cases are due to immunological disorders. It can be assumed that the male immune system starts to function when self-tolerance is partially lost, and the previous balance has been destroyed. Furthermore, sperm allergy has become a new topic in male immunology.

Immunotherapy, a primary anti-neoplastic treatment, exploits the patient’s immune system to kill neoplastic cells by modulating immune checkpoints such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed cell death 1. Despite an apparent anti-neoplastic efficacy, immunotherapeutic agents are often accompanied by multiorgan toxicity, including gastrointestinal ones. This particular class of immunotherapy-related adverse events, mainly represented by diarrhea and colitis, necessitates a nuanced treatment strategy. Current treatments are primarily based on standardized severity grading systems to guide and proportion therapeutic interventions, ranging from simple behavioral modifications or conventional molecules (such as anti-diarrheal) to advanced biological treatments. Tofacitinib, a pan-Janus kinase inhibitor, emerged as a potential option for managing immune-related (IR) colitis by targeting hyperactivated T cells within the colic microenvironment. However, evidence supporting the use of tofacitinib in IR colitis is primarily derived from case reports and small case series, lacking robust randomized clinical trial data. While preliminary findings demonstrate encouraging clinical control of IR colitis with tofacitinib, further research is warranted to elucidate its efficacy, safety, optimal dosage, and treatment duration. Although there are some worries about its effects on cancer response and safety, current evidence indicates that tofacitinib could be seen as a possible treatment choice if other therapies with more robust evidence profiles have not been successful.

The complement system is a key component of the innate immune system that mediates the clearance of pathogens, apoptotic cells, and cellular debris. However, the complement system also has diverse roles in the central nervous system (CNS), where it regulates synaptic pruning, neural plasticity, and neuroinflammation. Dysregulation of the complement system has been implicated in various neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, stroke, and traumatic brain injury. In these conditions, excessive or chronic activation of the complement system may lead to synaptic loss, neuronal damage, immune dysregulation, and inflammation, which leads to exacerbating the disease’s progression and severity. Moreover, the complement system may interact with infectious agents that invade the CNS, such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites, and modulate their pathogenicity and host response. Therefore, understanding the complex interplay between the complement system and the CNS is crucial for developing novel therapeutic strategies to prevent or treat neurodegenerative and neuroimmune disorders. Natural compounds, such as plant extracts, phytochemicals, and nutraceuticals, have emerged as promising candidates for modulating the complement system and its effects on the CNS. These compounds may exert anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, neuroprotective, and immunomodulatory effects by regulating the expression of various complement components and pathways. In this review, we summarized the current knowledge on the roles of the complement system in human neurodegenerative disorders and the benefits of natural compounds for complement-targeted therapy.