Differences by gender

Recent literature data indicate a different gender-related presentation of NAFLD. The prevalence of NAFLD is higher in males compared to premenopausal women becoming comparable after menopause, when women tend to gain weight, to have a different distribution of fat, mainly visceral, with an increased risk to develop NAFLD and CVD [22, 23].

Data on the prevalence of CV complications are controversial and not conclusive. An independent male association with coronary artery calcifications has been described in general population [13]. A large Korean cross-sectional study reported that men had a higher prevalence of NAFLD, carotid plaque and cIMT values [24]. On the contrary data obtained from German and Austrian populations indicate a close association between NAFLD and CV events (myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease) regardless of gender [25, 26].

In postmenopausal women a correlation between NAFLD (evaluated by computer tomography) and prevalence of coronary artery calcifications has been described, however the association was lost after correction for the known CVD risk factors [27]. Finally, although not conclusive, literature data suggest that while in the general population female sex appears to be protective for ischemic CV events, in women with NAFLD is not [28]. Indeed, in a recent meta-analysis considering 108,711 patients with NAFLD (44% females) all-cause mortality was about 1.5 times higher in women than in men and CV events 2 times higher [29].

Future studies on the different ways of evaluating metabolic alterations in women compared to men are needed in consideration of the increased number of transplants performed in women. In fact, in recent years, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) represents the leading cause of transplantation in the female population [30, 31].

Early atherosclerosis post LT

The presence of early atherosclerosis assessed by either cIMT or by the presence of carotid plaques in patients undergoing LT has been recently documented not only in adults but also in pediatric patients. Indeed, endothelial damage has been demonstrated to onset very early after LT, with increase in carotid IMT and stiffness after 6 months from transplant [36, 37], both in children and adolescents [38]. In adults, presence of subclinical atherosclerosis was associated with an increased prevalence of features of MS, namely diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia [37].

CAD post LT

CAD is the most studied CVD in patients post LT because of its highly negative prognostic impact on patient’s survival. In fact, a study following up patients post LT for 10 years showed an incidence of CAD, either with or without myocardial infarction, of approximately 40%, with increasing incidence over time (i.e. 15% at 3 years and 30% at 8 years post LT). In particular, among all patients who experienced CAD, 12% underwent a revascularization procedure in the first year after LT [39]. Interestingly, in subjects without pre-existing CVD, pre-transplant troponin I elevation (> 0.07 ng/mL) before LT was predictive of occurrence of CVD after LT [40], as well as of higher mortality in the first month post-transplant, possibly indicating that even subtle undiagnosed CAD (i.e. subclinical or microvascular), could predispose to future CV events [41].

Heart failure post LT

Heart failure after LT is often reported, with transient cardiac decompensation occurring in 7–43% of patients during postoperative period [42–49]. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM), described as a cardiac dysfunction (systolic or diastolic) in patients with end-stage liver disease without prior heart disease, includes a hyperdynamic circulation, a blend of systolic and diastolic dysfunction, along with prolonged ventricular repolarization, and blunted inotropic and chronotropic response to stress [32]. CCM is possibly due to fibrosis and hypertrophy of the myocardium and to subendocardial oedema [50, 51].

Pre-transplant diastolic dysfunction seems to be linked with graft rejection and failure [47], post-transplant mortality [44, 47] and post-transplant systolic heart failure [44, 48]. Indeed, in the absence of an overt clinical manifestation it is often challenging to establish whether subclinical CV damage was already present before the transplant or whether it is a new onset. In addition, some cardiac alterations of patients with cirrhosis are due to coexisting obesity or diabetes, thus making the diagnosis of CCM even more confusing. The recent availability of new methods for the assessment of CCM in patients with end-stage liver disease modified the criteria for the diagnosis and follow-up of the patients before and after LT [52].

Dysrhythmia post LT

A prolonged QT interval is very frequently reported in the ECG of patients listed for LT [50], and it is associated with a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), especially when the interval is more than 0.5 s. On the other hand, the prognostic role of prolonged QTc in cirrhotic patients not requiring LT is not defined [50]. However, QTc often normalizes after LT [50], whereas its persistent prolongation is associated with an increased rate of post LT fatal and non-fatal CV events [45, 53].

Among all tachyarrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, either before or after LT, is the most widely observed. Its prevalence in LT candidates ranges from 1.4% to 6% [33, 54] and it is associated with post LT increased CV complications, graft failure and mortality [33, 54, 55]. Interestingly increased long-term risk of atrial fibrillation has recently been described in NAFLD patients [56] and more severe the liver disease (i.e. NASH or cirrhosis) higher its prevalence. Few data are available on the development of atrial fibrillation after LT in patients with cirrhosis of which the etiology is not metabolic.

Assessment of CV risk post LT

In order to define the prognostic role of CV complications, CV risk assessment is essential in LT recipients, so that scores predictive of both early and late CV atherosclerotic complications are accumulating.

Among predictors of short term occurrence (i.e. within 1 year after LT) of CV events, the most widely used is the CV risk in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), which is based on pre-LT demographic, social, and clinical variables [57].

Conversely, scores for the assessment of the risk of late atherosclerotic complications tailored for LT recipients are missing, so that currently those applied in the general population are used, including the Framingham general CVD score (FRS) [58], the pooled cohort equations (PCEs) [59], the Reynolds Risk Score [60], the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster Study (PROCAM) [61] and the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation Project (SCORE) [62]. On the contrary, no validated scores for the prediction of heart failure after LT are available.

Along with risk scores, also the presence of metabolic comorbidities may help clinicians in stratifying CV risk in LT recipients. In fact, T2DM, especially if persistent after LT, has been demonstrated a key prognostic factor for CV morbidity, with an incidence of major CV events of 13% and 27% at 5 and 10 years [63].

Unfortunately, clear guidelines about CV follow-up after LT are missing, as well as about evaluation of subclinical CV changes. Usually, the follow-up consists of a clinical and biochemical control performed semesterly or annually and referral to a specialist only in the presence of hypertension or diabetes. If on one hand the onset CV events after LT has been widely studied, on the other hand only few studies and a meta-analysis [37, 64–72] demonstrated an increase in subclinical atherosclerosis after solid organ transplantation.

Liver graft with steatosis

Given the increased prevalence of NAFLD worldwide, along with a shortened organ pool donation in many countries, utilization of donor grafts with hepatic steatosis is now more common [73]. Hepatic steatosis is seen in the biopsies of a consistent percentage of potential liver donors, reaching up to 75% if overweight is present [74].

As a consequence of reperfusion, alterations in microcirculation and hepatocytes are induced by steatosis in the graft, with consequent necrosis and impaired regenerative processes [75, 76]. As a result, hepatic steatosis in donor livers exposes recipients to increased morbidity and mortality. Necessity of intensive care unit, longer hospitalization, as well as increased risk of graft failure [77–79], especially for steatosis in more than 60% of the graft [79–82], is usually observed. Viceversa, presence of moderate steatosis seems to affect significantly neither the long-term liver-related outcome [83] nor the CV outcome [37].

De novo steatosis

The term de novo NAFLD indicates the occurrence of steatosis in the transplanted livers of patients who did not have steatosis before LT, its prevalence ranging from 25% to 60% [37, 84–86] depending on follow-up duration and populations studied. Interestingly, prevalence of de novo steatosis increases over time (30% at 1 year up to nearly 50% after 10 years) with 5–10% progressing towards NASH and 2.5% to cirrhosis [85–89].

Risk factors for de novo steatosis

Risk factors for de novo steatosis include presence in LT recipients of sarcopenia and features of MS (especially insulin resistance, hypertension and obesity), tacrolimus based immunosuppressive therapy, hepatitis C virus and genetic predisposition as the genotype [83–85], as well as hypoadiponectinemia and high levels of free fatty acids [90]. Indeed, in transplanted patients who develop de novo steatosis, CV events are common with nearly 40% of transplant recipients experiencing an event within 10 years, one-third occurring within the first year.

Recurrence of steatosis

Recurrent NAFLD is the onset of steatosis in the graft of a patient needing LT for the liver complications of hepatic steatosis in a dysmetabolic setting, with a recurrence rate of 30–60% within 1–5 years after LT, and with progression towards NASH of 10–33% and advanced fibrosis of 5–10% [91]. Other data report a higher prevalence, with a recurrence rate as high as 90–100% [84, 92]. Differences in the prevalence of steatosis recurrence are likely related to the diagnostic methodology to assess steatosis, the time from transplant, and presence of pre and post-transplant risk factors.

In addition, patients who need a liver transplant because of metabolic cirrhosis are likely to have recurrence of NAFLD, and classically they present features of MS and pre-existing CV disease [91, 93], thus being exposed to higher CV risk by default [94, 95].

De novo and recurrent NAFLD are indeed two distinct entities. In particular, patients with recurrent NAFLD present higher prevalence of obesity and diabetes compared with patient with de novo NAFLD, are more likely to progress to advanced forms of NAFLD, suggesting a more aggressive course of the disease [87], likely because of a longer exposure to metabolic alterations. In addition, it has been reported that steatosis resolves in one-fifth of patients with de novo and only rarely in those with recurrent NAFLD [87]. However, data on the impact of recurrent NAFLD on long-term outcomes are conflicting, some showing a similar overall survival in patients with and without recurrent NAFLD [84, 91, 95], even in the presence of NASH [92], others an increase in mortality, mainly if patients had developed NASH [83, 92, 96].

Although there are no concordant data on the increase in overall mortality in NAFLD transplant patients compared to those of other etiologies, CV complications after LT are higher in NAFLD patients. In fact, a higher incidence of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events was reported in NAFLD subjects related to age, pre-transplant T2DM and other features of MS and a history of post-transplant CAD [10, 97].

Furthermore, de novo and recurrent steatosis are related to weight gain post LT. Weight gain is observed in almost all patients after 3 months from LT, with patients with pre-transplant NAFLD gaining more weight than non-NAFLD patients [98]. Moreover, new onset obesity was found related with a higher incidence of CV disease [99].