Upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) are rare subsets of urothelial cancer, which typically present with more aggressive course. Molecular markers stratifying urothelial tumors as luminal subtype and non-luminal subtype tumors have been proposed to select patients who may have greater or lesser benefit from neoadjuvant systemic therapy in bladder cancer, though not yet evaluated in UTUC. Here, a single-institution study retrospectively obtained clinical and genomic information in patients with UTUC and evaluated four patient tumors using the Decipher Bladder^® assay and Foundation Medicine^® test. All four patients had non-luminal molecular subtype including basal (N = 4) and mixed basal/claudin-low (N = 2) subtypes. The best clinical response achieved was stable disease in a patient who had basal/claudin-low subtype with residual ypT3 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For the remaining three patients, all were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy for eventual metastatic disease but all three showed progressive disease with limited overall survival, highlighting their aggressive course. The non-luminal subtype and lack of FGFR alteration may partly explain the poor overall outcomes while the real-world benefit of next generation sequencing for clinical use in UTUC patients require further clarification in a larger cohort study.

The treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is becoming increasingly complex. Standard of care management for the past decade has been adjuvant chemotherapy following curative intent resection regardless of nodal status or tumour profile. With the increased incorporation of immunotherapy in NSCLC, especially in the locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic settings, multiple studies have sought to assess its utility in early-stage disease. While there are suboptimal responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, there is a strong rationale for the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in tumour downstaging, based upon the concept of enhanced T cell priming at the time of a high tumour antigen burden, and demonstrated clinically in other solid tumours, such as melanoma. In the NSCLC cancer setting, currently over 20 combinations of chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant and perioperative setting have been studied with results variable. Multiple large phase III studies have demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy combinations result in significant advances in pathological response, disease free and overall survival which has led to practice change across the world. Currently, combination immunotherapy regimens with novel agents targeting alternate immunomodulatory pathways are now being investigated. Given this, the landscape of treatment in resectable early-stage NSCLC has become increasingly complex. This review outlines the literature of neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapy and discusses its potential benefits and complexities and ongoing considerations into future research.

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a highly malignant and invasive tumor with significant mortality and morbidity. Current treatment modalities such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy encounter significant limitations, such as poor targeting, systemic toxicity, and drug resistance. There is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies that offer targeted delivery, enhanced efficacy, and reduced side effects. The advent of lipid-based nanoparticles (LNPs) offers a promising tool for OSCC therapy, potentially overcoming the limitations of current therapeutic approaches. LNPs are composed of biodegradable and biocompatible lipids, which minimize the risk of toxicity and adverse effects. LNPs can encapsulate hydrophobic drugs, improving their solubility and stability in the biological environment, thereby enhancing their bioavailability. LNPs demonstrate significantly higher ability to encapsulate lipophilic drugs than other nanoparticle types. LNPs offer excellent storage stability, minimal drug leakage, and controlled drug release, making them highly effective nanoplatforms for the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents. Additionally, LNPs can be modified by complexing them with specific target ligands on their surface. This surface modification allows the active targeting of LNPs to the tumors in addition to the passive targeting mechanism. Furthermore, the PEGylation of LNPs improves their hydrophilicity and enhances their biological half-life by reducing clearance by the reticuloendothelial system. This review aims to discuss current treatment approaches and their limitations, as well as recent advancements in LNPs for better management of OSCC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-based combinations have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Despite significant improvements in survival and the achievement of sustained long-term responses, a subset of patients remains refractory to ICI, and most will eventually develop resistance. Thus, identifying predictive biomarkers for ICI efficacy and resistance is essential for optimizing therapeutic strategies. Up to now, tissue-based biomarkers have not been successful as predictive biomarkers in RCC. Circulating blood-based biomarkers offer a promising alternative. These biomarkers, including circulating immune cells, soluble factors, tumor-derived markers, and those based on metabolomics, are less invasive, offer reproducibility over time, and provide a comprehensive assessment of tumor biology and patient immune status, as well as allow dynamic monitoring during treatment. This review aims to evaluate the current evidence on the different candidate circulating biomarkers being investigated for their potential to predict ICI efficacy in RCC patients.

For a long time, the family of receptor tyrosine kinases, including epidermal growth factor receptor and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, was regarded as the main players stimulating cell proliferative signaling. Today, it is increasingly clear that many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are also involved in controlling the hallmarks of cancer by activating diverse intracellular signaling networks. GPCRs can therefore be considered as promising drug targets for fighting against diverse types of human malignancies. Although plant polyphenols, flavonoids, are well known for their diverse anticancer effects inhibiting the growth, proliferation, migration, and invasion of malignant cells, involvement of GPCRs in these activities has still remained largely unelucidated. Therefore, in this review article, the current knowledge about the role of GPCRs in anticancer action of structurally varied flavonoids is compiled, highlighting the ability of these natural polyphenols to modulate the expression levels of GPCRs but also suppress the action of endogenous ligands and downstream tumor-promoting events. These data show that targeting the respective GPCRs by specific flavonoids may open new perspectives in the therapeutic intervention in human malignancies.

Bladder cancer is a leading cancer type in men. The complexity of treatment in late-stage bladder cancer after systemic spread through the lymphatic system highlights the importance of modulating disease-free progression as early as possible in cancer staging. With current therapies relying on previous standards, such as platinum-based chemotherapeutics and immunomodulation with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, researchers, and clinicians are looking for targeted therapies to stop bladder cancer at its source early in progression. A new era of molecular therapies that target specific features upregulated in bladder cancer cell lines is surfacing, which may be able to provide clinicians and patients with better control of disease progression. Here, we discuss multiple emerging therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway, antibody-drug conjugates, modulation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) cell proliferation pathway, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and fibroblast growth factor receptor targeting. Together, these modern treatments provide potentially promising results for bladder cancer patients with the possibility of increasing remission and survival rates.

Prostate cancer (PC) depicts a major health challenge all over the globe due to its complexities in the treatment and diverse clinical trajectories. Even in the advances in the modern treatment strategies, the spectrum of resistance to the therapies continues to be a significant challenge. This review comprehensively examines the underlying mechanisms of the therapy resistance occurred in PC, focusing on both the tumor microenvironment and the signaling pathways implicated in the resistance. Tumor microenvironment comprises of stromal and epithelial cells, which influences tumor growth, response to therapy and progression. Mechanisms such as microenvironmental epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), anoikis suppression and stimulation of angiogenesis results in therapy resistance. Moreover, dysregulation of signaling pathways including androgen receptor (AR), mammalian target of rapamycin/phosphoinositide 3 kinase/AKT (mTOR/PI3K/AKT), DNA damage repair and Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathways drive therapy resistance by promoting tumor survival and proliferation. Understanding these molecular pathways is important for developing targeted therapeutic interventions which overcomes resistance. In conclusion, a complete grasp of mechanisms and pathways underlying medication resistance in PC is important for the development of individualized treatment plans and enhancements of clinical outcomes. By studying and understanding the complex mechanisms of signaling pathways and microenvironmental factors contributing to therapy resistance, this study focuses and aims to guide the development of innovative therapeutic approaches to effectively overcome the PC progression and improve the survival rate of patients.

Cancer remains a concern after years of research in this field. Conventional therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery are available for cancer treatment, but they are characterized by various side effects. There are several immunological challenges that make it difficult for the immune system and conventional therapies to treat cancer. Some of these challenges include heterogeneity, resistance to medicines, and cancer relapse. Even advanced treatments like immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which revolutionized cancer treatment, have associated toxicity and resistance further necessitate the exploration of alternative therapies. Anticancer peptides (ACPs) offer promising potential as cancer-fighting agents and address challenges such as treatment resistance, tumor heterogeneity, and metastasis. Although these peptides exist as components of the defense system in various plants, animals, fungi, etc., but can also be created synthetically and used as a new treatment measure. These peptides possess properties that make them appealing for cancer therapy, such as apoptosis induction, inhibition of angiogenesis, and cell membrane breakdown with low toxicity. Their capacity to specifically target cancer cells selectively holds promise for enhancing treatment environments as well as improving patients’ quality of life. This review provides detailed insights into the different prospects of ACPs, including their characterization, use as immunomodulatory agents in cancer treatment, and their mechanistic details after addressing various immunological challenges in existing cancer treatment strategies. In conclusion, ACPs have promising potential as novel cancer therapeutics due to their target specificity and fewer side effects than conventional therapies.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by poor prognostics and substantial therapeutic challenges, with dismal survival rates. Tumor resistance in PDAC is primarily attributed to its fibrotic, hypoxic, and immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA), an Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved minimally invasive technique for treating pancreatic cancer, disrupts tumors with heat and induces coagulative necrosis, releasing tumor antigens that may trigger a systemic immune response—the abscopal effect. We aim to elucidate the roles of EUS-RFA-mediated thermal and mechanical stress in enhancing anti-tumor immunity in PDAC. A comprehensive literature review focused on radiofrequency immunomodulation and immunotherapy in pancreatic tumors to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of RFA and its effect on the TME, which could prevent recurrence and resistance. We reviewed clinical, preclinical, and in vitro studies on RFA mechanisms in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, discussing the unique immunomodulatory effects of EUS-RFA. Recent findings suggest that combining RFA with immune adjuvants enhances responses in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. EUS-RFA offers a dual benefit against PDAC by directly reducing tumor viability and indirectly enhancing anti-tumor immunity. Observations of neutrophil-mediated immunomodulation and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) modulation support integrating EUS-RFA with targeted immunotherapies for managing pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Integrating EUS-RFA in PDAC treatment promises direct cytoreduction and synergistic effects with molecular targeted therapies. Prospective clinical trials are crucial to assess the efficacy of this combined approach in improving outcomes and survival rates in advanced PDAC cases.

The bone marrow microenvironment (BMM) has highly specialized anatomical characteristics that provide a sanctuary place for hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) that allow appropriate proliferation, maintenance, and self-renewal capacity. Several cell types contribute to the constitution and function of the bone marrow niche. Interestingly, uncovering the secrets of BMM and its interaction with HSCs in health paved the road for research aiming at better understanding the concept of leukemic stem cells (LSCs) and their altered niche. In fact, they share many signals that are responsible for interactions between LSCs and the bone marrow niche, due to several biological similarities between LSCs and HSCs. On the other hand, LSCs differ from HSCs in their abnormal activation of important signaling pathways that regulate survival, proliferation, drug resistance, invasion, and spread. Targeting these altered niches can help in better treatment choices for hematological malignancies and bone marrow disorders in general and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in particular. Moreover, targeting those niches may help in decreasing the emergence of drug resistance and lower the relapse rate. In this article, the authors reviewed the most recent literature on bone marrow niches and their relations with either normal HSCs and AML cells/LSC, by focusing on pathogenetic and therapeutic implications.

One of the directions in treatment of chemoresistant breast cancer (BC) may include new methods of activating the immune response against tumor cells. Clinically used checkpoint inhibition using antibodies to PD-1 and PD-L1 works in some patients, but the lack of biomarkers means number of respondents is low. The possibility of combining this method with chemotherapy is limited by an increased risk of toxic liver damage, development of immune-related pneumonitis, and thyroid dysfunction. This article includes introduction into the clinic of new methods of immunotherapy for BC, among which epigenetic activation of retroelements, double-stranded transcripts of which stimulate the interferon response against the tumor, is promising. For this purpose, inhibitors of DNA methyltransferase*, histone deacetylase* and histone methyltransferase* are used (* subtitles in the main text). Their antitumor effect is also mediated by removal of repressive epigenetic marks from tumor suppressor genes. However, numerous studies have proven the role of retroelements in the carcinogenesis of various malignant neoplasms, including BC. Moreover, endogenous retroviruses HERV-K and LINE1 retrotransposons are planned to be used as diagnostic biomarkers for BC. Therefore, a rational approach to using viral mimicry in antitumor therapy of BC may be the simultaneous suppression of specific retrotransposons (drivers for carcinogenesis) using reverse transcriptase inhibitors and silencing of specific transposons involved in carcinogenesis using complementary microRNAs. To determine possible pathways of influence in this direction, 35 specific transposon-derived microRNAs* changes in BC were identified, which can become guides for targeted therapy of BC.

Tumors with an impaired ability to repair DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination, including those with alterations in breast cancer 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2) genes, are very sensitive to blocking DNA single-strand repair by inhibition of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzyme. This provides the basis for a synthetic deadly strategy in the treatment of different types of cancer, such as prostate cancer (PCa). The phase 3 PROfound study was the first to lead to olaparib approval in patients with metastatic castration resistant PCa (mCRPC) and BRCA genes mutations. In recent years, the benefit of combination therapy consisted of a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) plus an androgen receptor signalling inhibitor (ARSi), was evaluated as first-line treatment of mCRPC, regardless of the mutational state of genes, participating in the homologous recombination repair (HRR). This review explores the role of PARPi in PCa and analyses the data of latest clinical trials exploring the PARPi—ARSi combinations, and how these results could change our clinical practice.

Accurate identification of prostate cancer Gleason grade group remains an important component of the initial management of clinically localized disease. However, Gleason score upgrading (GSU) from biopsy to radical prostatectomy can occur in up to a third of patients treated with surgery. Concern for disease undergrading remains a source of diagnostic uncertainty, contributing to both over-treatment of low-risk disease as well as under-treatment of higher-risk prostate cancer. This review examines the published literature concerning risk factors for GSU from time of biopsy to prostatectomy final pathology. Risk factors identified for Gleason upgrading include patient demographic and clinical factors including age, body mass index, race, prostate volume, and biomarker based assays, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, and testosterone values. In addition, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings have also been associated with GSU. Biopsy-specific characteristics associated with GSU include lower number of biopsy cores and lack of targeted methodology, and possibly increasing percent biopsy core positivity. Recognition of risk factors for disease undergrading may prompt confirmatory testing including repeat sampling or imaging. Continued refinements in imaging guided biopsy techniques may also reduce sampling error contributing to undergrading.

The landscape of treatment for first-line therapy in advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) and metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) has rapidly changed in the last year alone. Maintenance avelumab remains a viable treatment option for many patients across the globe for those who have responded or have achieved stable disease after platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the recent FDA approvals based on EV-302 for enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab, as well as CheckMate-904 with gemcitabine and cisplatin with nivolumab (GC+N) followed by maintenance nivolumab have left clinicians with the complicated decision of determining which regimen is most appropriate for their individual patients with untreated aUC. This commentary highlights the key trials that have set the standard-of-care for front-line aUC treatment and suggestions for choosing different regimens for the appropriate patient.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the landscape of cancer therapy. Over the last decade, both their primary focus in trials and clinical application have exponentially risen, with repeated demonstrations of their efficacy in improving survival in various cancer types. The adverse effects of these drugs on various organ systems were recognised in early phase studies. Given their relatively new emergence on the market, there has been increasing interest into short- and long-term effects and management of ICIs in real-world settings. ICI-related hepatobiliary toxicities are often challenging to diagnose and difficult to distinguish from other causes of deranged liver biochemical tests. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date and detailed exploration of the hepatobiliary complications of ICIs, including pathogenesis and approaches to diagnosis and management.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is operable still carries a high risk of recurrence, approaching 50% of all operable cases despite adding adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the utilization of immunotherapy and targeted therapy moving beyond the metastatic NSCLC setting and into early-stage perioperative management has generated tremendous enthusiasm and has been practice-changing. Adjuvant atezolizumab in NSCLC first demonstrated a clinical benefit with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Then, with studies studying a significant benefit in major pathologic response in surgical patients treated preoperatively with immunotherapy compared to only chemotherapy, neoadjuvant nivolumab and chemotherapy were evaluated and showed significant event-free survival benefit leading to subsequent studies evaluating perioperative immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Meanwhile, with regards to targeted therapies, adjuvant osimertinib in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and adjuvant alectinib in ALK-rearranged NSCLC have both received regulatory approvals following demonstrated clinical benefit in clinical trials. With rapidly evolving changes in the field, new combinations such as multiple immunotherapy agents and antibody-drug conjugates in development, perioperative NSCLC management has quickly become complicated with different pathways to perioperative treatment. Furthermore, circulating tumor DNA and studies looking at better tools to prognosticate immunotherapy response will help with decision-making regarding which patients should receive immunotherapy and if so, either only pre-operatively or both pre- and post-operatively. In this review, we look at the evolution of systemic therapy in the perioperative setting from adjuvant chemotherapy to adjuvant immunotherapy to perioperative immunotherapy and look at perioperative targeted therapy while looking ahead to future considerations.