• All
  • Article Title
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Author
  • Institution
  • Open Access
    Original Article

    Genomic alterations in the WNT/β-catenin pathway and resistance of colorectal cancer cells to pathway-targeting therapies

    Ioannis A. Voutsadakis 1,2*

    Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2025;6:1002295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37349/etat.2025.1002295

    Received: October 10, 2024 Accepted: January 23, 2025 Published: February 25, 2025

    Academic Editor: Nicola Normanno, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Italy

    Abstract

    Aim:

    Colorectal cancer is the most prevalent gastrointestinal malignancy with limited therapeutic options in the metastatic setting. The WNT/β-catenin/adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) pathway is commonly deregulated in the disease and presents a rational target for therapeutic exploitation.

    Methods:

    The publicly available genomic data from the colorectal cancer cohort of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used to define groups of colorectal cancers with alterations in APC or other key genes of the WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway and to identify genomic characteristics of interest in each group. In vitro sensitivity data for drugs targeting the pathway were compiled from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) project.

    Results:

    Three-fourths of colorectal cancers possessed APC alterations and about one in four of these cases possessed also concomitant alterations in other genes of the WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway, including RNF43, CTNNB1, and TCF7L2. Colorectal cancers with alterations in one or more of the three genes of the WNT/β-catenin pathway, RNF43, CTNNB1, and TCF7L2, in the absence of APC alterations, were frequently microsatellite instability (MSI) high and had high tumor mutation burden (TMB). Cancers with these same alterations in the three genes with or without APC alterations presented a high frequency of mutations in receptor tyrosine kinases, PI3K/AKT pathway genes, and DNA damage response genes. Cell lines without mutations in WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway components displayed numerically greater sensitivity to inhibitors of the pathway in vitro.

    Conclusions:

    Groups of colorectal cancers differing in WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway alterations present diverse genomic landscapes that could have therapeutic implications for the rational development of inhibitors of the pathway.

    Keywords

    Canonical WNT pathway, RNF43, CTNNB1, TCF7L2, treatment resistance

    Introduction

    Colorectal cancer represents the most prevalent gastrointestinal malignancy in Western countries and one of the most lethal neoplasms globally [1, 2]. Metastatic disease can be effectively palliated by chemotherapy treatments, which may also prolong the survival of responding patients [3]. Moreover, progress in the genomic characterization of colorectal cancers has led to effective targeted therapies for specific sub-sets of colorectal cancers possessing targetable alterations [47]. For example, checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy is effective in mismatch repair (MMR) deficient colorectal cancers [4]. Colorectal cancers with V600E BRAF mutations may be treated with combinations of small molecule BRAF inhibitors and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and the less common HER2 over-expressing colorectal cancers may be treated with drugs targeting this alteration [5, 6]. The majority of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who bear MMR proficient tumors or tumors with KRAS mutations (besides KRAS G12C) have few options available besides chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic agents [8].

    Besides the receptor tyrosine kinase/KRAS/BRAF/MEK pathway, other pathways frequently deregulated in colorectal cancers include p53, the TGFβ/SMAD cascade, and the WNT/β-catenin/adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) pathway, which is most commonly activated through mutations in tumor suppressor APC [9]. All these frequently altered pathways are currently not targeted clinically but represent potential therapeutic opportunities in colorectal cancer given their prevalence and pathogenic involvement in the disease [10, 11]. Inhibition of the aberrantly activated WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway could be the most attractive therapeutic target, as mutations of APC are present in up to three-fourths of colorectal cancers and remaining cases have common mutations in other components of the pathway [12, 13]. APC is a regulator of the assembly of the β-catenin destruction complex, which promotes β-catenin phosphorylation and ubiquitination and leads to its proteasome degradation [14]. Mutations in APC promote β-catenin stabilization and signaling even in the absence of external signals for the activation of the pathway [15]. Other mutations activating the WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway occur less frequently in colorectal cancers, but they may also produce aberrant activation. These include activating mutations in CTNNB1 gene encoding for β-catenin, inactivating mutations of ubiquitin ligase RNF43, which is a regulator of the abundance of Frizzled receptors of the pathway, and activating mutations of TCF7L2, encoding for the β-catenin transcription co-factor TCF4 [12]. In the current investigation, the landscapes of colorectal cancers with mutations in the WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway are elucidated and therapeutic implications are explored based on in vitro cell line data, as well as knock down and knock out arrays.

    Materials and methods

    Colorectal cancer cohort

    Clinical and genomic data of patients with colorectal cancer were extracted from the colorectal cancer cohort of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) [12]. The cohort includes a total of 594 patients, of whom 534 patients were profiled for mutations. TCGA used whole exome sequencing for the genomic analyses. In addition to mutations, TCGA provided analyses of copy number alterations and structural variants. Single nucleotide mutation calling was conducted with input from various pipelines [16]. Copy number alterations were analyzed in TCGA studies with the GISTIC (Genomic Identification of Significant Targets in Cancer) algorithm, which assigns a score of 2 or above in genes with putative amplification [17]. For quantification of chromosomal instability (CIN), TCGA used a score (aneuploidy score, AS) which was calculated in each sample as the sum of the number of chromosome arms in the sample that had copy number gains or losses. For the calculation of AS, chromosome arms were defined as copy number altered if more than 80% of their length contained somatic copy number alterations. In contrast, chromosome arms with somatic copy number alterations extending from 20% to 80% of their length were considered indeterminate and chromosome arms with somatic copy number alterations in less than 20% of their length were considered not altered. For the calculation of the AS from Affymetrix 6.0 SNP arrays an algorithm called ABSOLUTE was used in TCGA [18].

    Colorectal cancer cell lines

    The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) is an extensive collection of cancer cell lines procured from various agencies and analyzed using whole exome sequencing [19]. Similar to TCGA, the determination of copy number alterations in the CCLE collection was performed with the GISTIC algorithm [17]. Data on drug sensitivity of cell lines from colorectal cancer with APC and other WNT/β-catenin pathway mutations were obtained from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) dataset (http://www.cancerrxgene.org) [20]. The GDSC project contains two experimental datasets, GDSC1 and GDSC2, that differ in the experimental conditions used. GDSC1 experiments were performed between 2009 and 2015. These experiments used media alone in the negative control cell lines not exposed to drugs. The most recent dataset GDSC2 performed after 2015 and used in the current study employed media with vehicle (DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide) in the negative controls. Dependencies on knock down or knock out of specific genes in colorectal cancer cell lines with APC and other WNT/β-catenin pathway mutations were obtained from the DepMap portal that contains data from RNA interference (RNAi) arrays and CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) arrays of cell lines from the CCLE collection [21, 22]. CRISPR and RNAi arrays identify essential genes that are important for the survival of assayed cell lines and, as a result, the absence of these essential genes has a significant survival and proliferation effect in vitro [2325]. The genes and dependencies discovered with the two array methodologies do not completely overlap, as the depth of suppression differs. RNAi experiments in DepMap were from project Achilles which used the DEMETER algorithm for analysis [24]. CRISPR arrays in DepMap were from project SCORE containing 323 cancer cell lines from various cancers and a library of 18,009 targeted genes [26]. Computational modeling of experiments in SCORE was performed with the CERES and the CHRONOS algorithms [27, 28].

    Interrogation of both TCGA cohort and colorectal cancer cell lines at the individual case and cell line level was performed online at the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics platform (cBioportal, http://www.cbioportal.org). cBioportal is a site containing genomic and associated clinical data from publicly available studies, maintained by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and other academic institutions [29, 30]. Two groups of alterations in the WNT/β-catenin pathway, the first consisting of APC alterations and the second consisting of alterations in three other WNT/β-catenin pathway genes (RNF43, CTNNB1, and TCF7L2) were considered in the TCGA cohort and groups of patients were constructed in a 2 by 2 manner resulting in a total of four groups.

    Statistical comparisons of categorical and continuous data were carried out with the Fisher exact test or the χ2-test and the t-test or ANOVA. All statistical comparisons were considered significant if P < 0.05.

    Results

    Prevalence and clinical comparison in the four groups

    The frequently altered colorectal cancer tumor suppressor, APC showed alterations (most commonly mutations and a small number of deletions) in 395 of the 534 cases (74%) in the colorectal cancer cohort of TCGA with mutation data. Of the APC altered cases, 95 cases (17.8% of the entire cohort) possessed also concomitant alterations (mostly mutations and a small number of amplifications or deletions) in one or more of three other WNT/β-catenin pathway genes, RNF43, CTNNB1, and TCF7L2 (termed quadruple altered cohort) and 300 cases (56.2% of the entire cohort) had no alterations in these three genes (termed APC only altered cohort). Colorectal cancers without APC alterations constituted 26% of the cases in the colorectal cancer TCGA cohort and among them, 44 cases (8.2% of the entire cohort) had alterations in RNF43, CTNNB1, or TCF7L2 (termed triple altered cohort) and 95 cases (17.8% of the entire cohort) had no alterations in RNF43, CTNNB1, and TCF7L2 (quadruple wild type cohort). The four groups did not differ significantly in their average age, percentage of older (above 65 years old) patients, the distribution of sexes, or the stage of colorectal cancer at diagnosis (Table 1). The majority of cancers in the triple altered cohort (93.2%) were located in the colon and only 6.8% of those cancers were rectal, while in the three other groups, 25% to 30% of the cases were rectal (χ2-test P = 0.01, Table 1). Significant differences were also observed between the groups in their genomic characteristics (Table 2). The triple altered group had a majority (60%) of microsatellite instability (MSI) cases, which were less frequent in the other cohorts (22% in the quadruple altered and quadruple wild type cohorts and only 3.2% in the APC only altered cohort). Chromosome instability (CIN), on the other hand, was more prevalent in the APC only altered cohort (83% of cases), followed by the quadruple wild type cohort (66% of cases) and the quadruple altered cohort (53.5% of cases), while the triple altered group presented the lowest CIN prevalence (35% of cases). Consistent with the genomic sub-type prevalence, the triple altered group had the highest frequency of high tumor mutation burden (TMB) (above 10 mutations/Mb) and the highest frequency of low AS and FGA scores compared with the three other groups (Table 2).

    Characteristics of colorectal cancers with APC, RNF43, CTNNB1, or TCF7L2 alterations from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)

    CharacteristicEntire cohort (n = 594)Quadruple altered (n = 95)APC only altered (n = 300)Triple altered (n = 44)Quadruple wild type (n = 95)P
    Age (mean ± SD)66.1 ± 13.464.4 ± 1366.2 ± 11.965.8 ± 16.565.7 ± 14.30.72
    Age
    ≤ 65 years-old260 (43.9)48 (51.1)134 (44.8)18 (40.9)40 (42.1)0.56
    > 65 years-old332 (56.1)46 (48.9)165 (55.2)26 (59.1)55 (57.9)
    NA21100-
    Sex
    Male312 (52.7)47 (50)164 (54.8)23 (52.3)43 (45.3)0.41
    Female280 (47.3)47 (50)135 (45.2)21 (47.7)52 (54.7)
    NA21100-
    Stage
    I104 (17.9)13 (14.4)59 (20.1)6 (13.6)17 (18.3)I–II versus III–IV: 0.26
    II220 (37.9)39 (43.3)98 (33.5)23 (52.3)41 (44.1)
    III170 (29.3)23 (25.6)97 (33.1)12 (27.3)19 (20.4)
    IV86 (14.8)15 (16.7)39 (13.3)3 (6.8)16 (17.2)
    NA145702-
    Location primary
    Colon436 (74.1)70 (75.3)209 (70.4)41 (93.2)71 (75.5)0.01
    Rectal152 (25.9)23 (24.7)88 (29.6)3 (6.8)23 (24.5)
    NA62301-
    Display full size

    Percentages are shown in parentheses. NA: not available; SD: standard deviation; APC: adenomatous polyposis coli. -: no data

    Subtype, tumor mutation burden (TMB), aneuploidy score (AS), and fraction genome altered (FGA) in colorectal cancers with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin pathway alterations from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)

    CharacteristicEntire cohort (n = 594)Quadruple altered (n = 95)APC only altered (n = 300)Triple altered (n = 44)Quadruple wild type (n = 95)P
    Subtype
    GS58 (12.7)11 (12.7)39 (13.8)2 (5)6 (12)GS versus CIN versus MSI: < 0.00001
    CIN328 (71.4)46 (53.5)235 (83)14 (35)33 (66)
    MSI63 (13.7)19 (22.1)9 (3.2)24 (60)11 (22)
    POLE10 (2.2)10 (11.7)000-
    NA135917445-
    TMB
    ≤ 10 mutations/Mb451 (84.5)63 (66.3)288 (96)17 (38.6)83 (87.4)< 0.00001
    > 10 mutations/Mb83 (15.5)32 (33.7)12 (4)27 (61.4)12 (12.6)
    NA600000-
    AS
    < 4108 (18.4)30 (32.3)39 (13.1)29 (65.9)15 (15.8)< 0.00001
    4–24427 (72.9)58 (62.4)226 (76.1)15 (34.1)70 (73.7)
    > 2451 (8.7)5 (5.3)32 (10.8)010 (10.5)
    NA82300-
    FGA
    < 0.075115 (19.7)28 (30.1)32 (10.9)24 (55.8)16 (17)< 0.00001
    0.075–0.35319 (54.7)49 (52.7)179 (61.1)15 (34.9)54 (57.5)
    > 0.35149 (25.6)16 (17.2)82 (28)4 (9.3)24 (25.5)
    NA112711-
    Display full size

    Percentages are shown in parentheses. GS: genomically stable; CIN: chromosomal instability, MSI: microsatellite instability; NA: not available; POLE: polymerase epsilon. -: no data

    Mutation comparison in the four groups

    Mutations in the gene encoding for tumor suppressor p53, TP53, were more frequent in the two groups with APC alterations (54.7% of cases in the quadruple altered group and 71% of cases in the APC only altered group) compared with the two groups without APC alterations (43.2% of cases in the triple altered group and 31.6% of cases in the quadruple wild type group, χ2-test P < 0.00001, Figure 1). Mutations in oncogene KRAS, and in the less prevalent NRAS, were also more frequent in the two groups with APC alterations (χ2-test P < 0.00001 for KRAS, but not reaching significance, P = 0.14, for NRAS). BRAF mutations were significantly more prevalent in the triple altered group, with 47.7% of cases showing mutations, compared with 4% to 16.8% of cases in the other groups (χ2-test P < 0.00001, Figure 1). PIK3CA mutations were more prevalent in the two groups with RNF43, CTNNB1, or TCF7L2 alterations (χ2-test P = 0.0003).

    Prevalence of mutations in frequently mutated cancer-associated genes in colorectal cancers with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway alterations. Data are from TCGA (the Cancer Genome Atlas). APC: adenomatous polyposis coli

    The genes encoding for receptor tyrosine kinases, including members of the EGFR family, members of the FGFR family, RET, ALK, and NTRK3 were significantly more frequently mutated in the two groups with RNF43, CTNNB1, or TCF7L2 alterations (Table 3 and Figure 2). Moreover, several proteins of the KRAS/BRAF/MEK and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways had a higher prevalence in the same groups (Table 3 and Figure 3).

    Mutation frequencies in representative cancer-associated genes in colorectal cancers with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin pathway alterations from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)

    GeneEntire cohort (n = 534)Quadruple altered (n = 95)APC only altered (n = 300)Triple altered (n = 44)Quadruple wild type (n = 95)P
    EGFR19 (3.6)6 (6.3)5 (1.7)2 (4.5)2 (2.1)0.09
    ERBB220 (3.7)8 (8.4)8 (2.7)3 (6.8)1 (1.1)0.02
    ERBB332 (6.0)15 (15.8)8 (2.7)3 (6.8)3 (3.2)0.00001
    ERBB462 (11.6)19 (20)18 (6)8 (18.2)4 (4.2)0.00002
    FGFR222 (4.1)5 (5.3)4 (1.3)3 (6.8)4 (4.2)0.06
    FGFR318 (3.4)10 (10.5)3 (1)3 (6.8)1 (1.1)0.00002
    RET30 (5.6)11 (11.6)9 (3)6 (13.6)2 (2.1)0.0003
    ALK41 (7.7)16 (16.8)8 (2.7)4 (9.1)4 (4.2)< 0.00001
    NTRK329 (5.4)8 (8.4)7 (2.3)4 (9.1)3 (3.2)0.02
    NF143 (8.1)15 (15.8)8 (2.7)6 (13.6)2 (2.1)< 0.00001
    RASA129 (5.4)9 (9.5)6 (2)3 (6.8)2 (2.1)0.004
    PIK3CB16 (3.0)6 (6.3)2 (0.7)3 (6.8)00.001
    PIK3R138 (7.1)15 (15.8)9 (3)3 (6.8)5 (5.3)0.0001
    PTEN48 (9.0)10 (10.5)10 (3.3)10 (22.7)4 (4.2)< 0.00001
    PPP2R1A15 (2.8)7 (7.4)3 (1)3 (6.8)1 (1.1)0.001
    TSC121 (3.9)9 (9.5)4 (1.3)4 (9.1)1 (1.1)0.0001
    MTOR46 (8.6)15 (15.8)11 (3.7)6 (13.6)9 (9.5)0.0003
    MSH227 (5.1)15 (15.8)3 (1)3 (6.8)0< 0.00001
    MSH629 (5.4)14 (14.7)3 (1)3 (6.8)4 (4.2)< 0.00001
    PMS216 (3.0)8 (8.4)4 (1.3)2 (4.5)00.001
    MLH124 (4.5)7 (7.4)5 (1.7)7 (15.9)3 (3.2)0.00004
    POLE50 (9.4)24 (25.3)6 (2)3 (6.8)3 (3.2)< 0.00001
    BRCA119 (3.6)9 (9.5)3 (1)3 (6.8)1 (1.1)0.00009
    BRCA269 (12.9)19 (20)12 (4)6 (13.6)1 (1.1)< 0.00001
    ATM107 (20.0)23 (24.2)25 (8.3)12 (27.2)10 (10.5)0.00002
    BRIP125 (4.7)11 (11.6)3 (1)04 (4.2)0.00002
    CDK1242 (7.9)13 (13.7)7 (2.3)8 (18.2)3 (3.2)< 0.00001
    LRP1B190 (35.6)29 (30.5)41 (13.7)11 (25)13 (13.7)0.0007
    AMER172 (13.5)22 (23.2)32 (10.7)6 (13.6)7 (7.4)0.004
    AXIN236 (6.7)10 (10.5)7 (2.3)7 (15.9)5 (5.3)0.0001
    FAT199 (18.5)26 (27.4)13 (4.3)12 (27.3)5 (5.3)< 0.00001
    FAT4124 (23.2)35 (36.8)54 (18)21 (47.7)14 (14.7)< 0.00001
    Display full size

    Percentages are shown in parentheses. APC: adenomatous polyposis coli

    Prevalence of mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase genes in colorectal cancers with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway alterations. Data are from TCGA (the Cancer Genome Atlas). APC: adenomatous polyposis coli

    Prevalence of mutations in genes encoding for proteins of the KRAS/BRAF/MEK and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways in colorectal cancers with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway alterations. Data are from TCGA (the Cancer Genome Atlas). APC: adenomatous polyposis coli

    Consistent with the higher prevalence of MSI and high TMB, the two groups with RNF43, CTNNB1, or TCF7L2 alterations possessed statistically significant higher mutation rates of genes encoding for MMR-associated proteins and proofreading polymerase epsilon (Table 3 and Figure 4). The quadruple wild type group showed a low rate of mutations in these genes, despite containing 22% of MSI high cases, suggesting that epigenetic modifications such as MLH1 promoter methylation may be the responsible alterations involved in producing MMR defects in this group.

    Prevalence of mutations in mismatch repair associated genes and proofreading polymerase epsilon gene (POLE) in colorectal cancers with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway alterations. Data are from TCGA (the Cancer Genome Atlas). APC: adenomatous polyposis coli

    DNA damage response genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, and CDK12 were more frequently mutated in the two groups with RNF43, CTNNB1, or TCF7L2 alterations, both with (quadruple altered group) and without (triple altered group) APC alterations compared with the two groups without RNF43, CTNNB1, or TCF7L2 alterations (Table 3 and Figure 5). ATM mutations had the highest prevalence of mutations in the two RNF43, CTNNB1, or TCF7L2 altered groups with about one-fourth of the cases being mutated (Figure 5).

    Prevalence of mutations in genes encoding for proteins of the DNA damage response pathway in colorectal cancers with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway alterations. Data are from TCGA (the Cancer Genome Atlas). APC: adenomatous polyposis coli

    In addition to RNF43, CTNNB1, and TCF7L2 alterations, the quadruple altered and triple altered groups displayed more frequent mutations in other components of the WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway, such as LRP1B, AXIN2, and the atypical cadherins FAT1 and FAT4 (Table 3 and Figure 6). LRP1B mutations were present in one-fourth of the cases, while FAT1 and FAT4 had an even higher prevalence of mutations in these groups.

    Prevalence of mutations in genes encoding for other proteins of the WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway, besides APC, RNF43, CTNNB1, and TCF7L2, in colorectal cancers with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway alterations. Data are from TCGA (the Cancer Genome Atlas). APC: adenomatous polyposis coli

    Cell lines comparison

    Similar to colorectal cancer patient samples, APC mutations were the most common genomic alterations of the WNT/β-catenin pathway in the colorectal cancer cell line cohort of the CCLE collection consisting of 84 colorectal cancer cell lines. The three other genes of the pathway that are frequently mutated in colorectal cancer samples, RNF43, CTNNB1, and TCF7L2, were also frequently mutated in colorectal cancer cell lines, although less frequently than APC. Among APC mutated cell lines, 11 cell lines possessed pathogenic mutations in both APC and one or more of the three other genes of the pathway (the quadruple mutant group, Table 4). The cell lines with pathogenic APC mutations in the absence of mutations in RNF43, CTNNB1, or TCF7L2 formed the APC only mutated group consisting of 13 cell lines. Nine colorectal cancer cell lines had mutations in one or more of the three other genes, in the absence of APC mutations (triple mutated cell lines, Table 4). A fourth group consisting of four cell lines were wild type for all four frequently mutated WNT/β-catenin pathway genes (APC, RNF43, CTNNB1, and TCF7L2: quadruple wild type cell lines) (Table 4).

    Colorectal cancer cell lines with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin pathway mutations

    Cell lineDepMap IDTMBFGAPloidyMSI status
    Quadruple mutated
    CL-34ACH-00089542.733330.1491.98NA
    CW-2ACH-000998274.96670.02932MSI
    GP2dACH-000982169.20.04182NA
    HCT-15ACH-000997259.66670.02692MSI
    KM12ACH-000969110.70.13042MSI
    LoVoACH-00095077.50.20922.2MSI
    LS411NACH-000985182.06670.28073.41MSI
    NCI-H630ACH-00228775.4NANANA
    SNU-C2AACH-000967104.16670.10341.98NA
    SNU-C4ACH-00095973.466670.03371.99NA
    SNU-C5ACH-000970100.03330.09662.05MSI
    APC only mutated
    C75ACH-0014588.333333NANANA
    C80ACH-0014597.133333NANANA
    C84ACH-0014607.566667NANANA
    CACO2ACH-0000035.6NANANA
    COLO 201ACH-0002538.8666670.382.96MSS
    DiFiACH-0022337.2NANAMSS
    GEOACH-00239411.13333NANAMSS
    HCC2998ACH-001081233.4333NANAMSS
    MDST8ACH-00093525.866670.55832.12MSS
    SK-CO-1ACH-0004009.90.5523.68MSS
    SNU-175ACH-000989183.86670.09272.05MSI
    SW1116ACH-00048912.033330.63392.76MSS
    SW1417ACH-0002368.50.56833.12MSS
    Triple mutated
    HCC-56ACH-00046712.966670.52882.94NA
    HCT 116ACH-000971106.50.0822.06MSI
    LIM1215ACH-00154630.36667NA1.97MSI
    LS1034ACH-00025212.40.35623.11MSS
    NCI-H508ACH-00036010.733330.48132.31MSS
    NCI-H716ACH-00049114.10.61372.83MSS
    RKOACH-000943114.66670.14212.15MSI
    SNU-407ACH-00095588.333330.08952.08MSI
    SNU-C2BACH-00119986.2NA2.02MSI
    Quadruple wild type
    C10ACH-0014547.233333NANANA
    C99ACH-0014616.9NANANA
    CAR1ACH-0023457.833333NA2.77MSS
    LS513ACH-00000713.90.26362.28MSS
    Display full size

    TMB: tumor mutation burden; FGA: fraction genome altered; MSI: microsatellite instability; MSS: microsatellite stability; NA: not available; APC: adenomatous polyposis coli. Data are from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE)

    Although data from some cell lines in the quadruple mutated group were not available, all cell lines of the group with data available were MSI high and had a high TMB (Table 4). All but one cell line was diploid and most had a low CIN as measured by the FGA. In contrast, and consistent with patient samples, all but one cell line in the group with APC only mutations were microsatellite stability (MSS), and had low TMB and high CIN. The group of cell lines with non-APC WNT/β-catenin pathway gene mutations (triple mutated group) was comprised of both MSS and MSI cell lines and a corresponding mixture of high and low TMB (Table 4). Lastly, the quadruple wild type group was comprised of cell lines with low TMB and MSS status. Pathogenic TP53 mutations were present in 8 of the 11 (82.7%) cell lines of the quadruple mutated group, in 8 of the 13 (61.5%) cell lines of the APC only mutated group, in 6 of the 9 (66.7%) cell lines of the triple mutated group and in 1 of the 4 (25%) cell lines of the quadruple wild type group (Table 5). Classic codon 12 and 13 pathogenic KRAS mutations were present in 4 of the 11 (36.4%) quadruple mutated cell lines (one other cell line of the group had a mutation of unknown significance at codon 140). Pathogenic KRAS mutations were present in 7 of 13 (53.8%) cell lines of the APC only mutated group, in 5 of 9 (55.6%) cell lines of the triple mutated group, and in 1 of the 4 (25%) cell lines of the quadruple wild type group (Table 5). No cell lines in the four groups possessed mutations in the homologous NRAS gene, but 2 cell lines from the quadruple mutated group had homo-deletions of the NRAS locus at chromosome 1p13.2, an alteration that is rarely observed in colorectal cancer patient samples, with a prevalence of 0.7% in the colorectal cohort from TCGA.

    Alterations of frequently mutated genes of colorectal cancer in colorectal cancer cell lines with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin pathway mutations

    Cell lineTP53KRASNRASBRAFPIK3CAAPCRNF43CTNNB1TCF7L2
    Quadruple mutated
    CL-34*S127P, *K382Nfs*40WTWT*V600EWT*T1556Nfs*3, *E418*, R856CWTWT*K468Sfs*23, L200I
    CW-2WTP140HWTWTP283S*S1465Wfs*3, *R302*, G470R, A528V, E2737G, I2756VWTR582Q*C469Vfs*8
    GP2dWT*G12DWTT529A*H1047L*T1445Lfs*27, L2384I, S2562G, HDS771T, D628GD755V*W156*
    HCT-15*S241F, *X367_splice*G13DWTWT*E545K, *D549N*I1417Lfs*2, *R2166*, R727M, K993N, K1561N, E2550Q, I1779M*G659Vfs*41, L214MWTWT
    KM12*H179R, *V73Wfs*50WTWTA712T, A404Cfs*9WT*N1818Kfs*2, G471E*G659Vfs*41SETD5 fusionWT
    LoVoWT*G13DWTWTWT*R1114*, *M1431Cfs*42, R2816QWT*R535Q*K468Sfs*23
    LS411N*Y126*WTWT*V600EWT*T1556Nfs*3, *Q789**G659Vfs*41WTWT
    NCI-H630*R342*WTWTWTWT*Q1367*, V1173MWTWT*K468Sfs*23
    SNU-C2A*R273C, *R273H, *R273Y*G12DHDWTD725G*K2051Efs*9*R337*, C275Wfs*143, R389CHD*K468Sfs*23
    SNU-C4*G245SWTHDD22N*E545G, V71I*F801Lfs*19, *T1556Lfs*9, H325R*R225Afs*194WT*K468Sfs*23
    SNU-C5*R248W, *V218LWTWT*V600E*H1047R*N1792Kfs*7*G659Vfs*41WTWT
    APC only mutated
    C75*R249SWTWTWTWT*Q1204*, *S943Qfs*12, *L1488Ffs*23WTWTWT
    C80*Q52**A146VWTWTWT*L629*WTWTWT
    C84*R342**G12AWTWTWT*R1450*, *R283*, *R640WWTWTWT
    CACO2*C135F, *E204*WTWTWTWT*Q1367*WTG245AWT
    COLO 201WTWTWT*V600EWT*T1556Nfs*3WTWTWT
    DiFi*K132RWTWTWTWT*E1151*, *E443Afs*16WTWTWT
    GEOWT*G12AWTWTWT*E1536*, *C344Vfs*110WTWTWT
    HCC2998*R213**A146TWTWTWT*R1450*, *L665*, I2167S, S1864Y, N2720K, R168IWTWTWT
    MDST8WTWTWT*V600E, *V600K, *V600MWT*T1556Nfs*3WTWTWT
    SK-CO-1WT*G12V, AMPLWTAMPLWT*F1089fs*37WTWTWT
    SNU-175WT*A59TWTNANA*R232*, *N1455fs*18, *G1499*, A199VWTWTWT
    SW1116*A159D*G12AWTNAAMPL*Q264*, *Q1429Hfs*41WTWTWT
    SW1417*C238Hfs*21WTWT*V600E, AMPLNA*R1450*WTWTWT
    Triple mutated
    HCC-56*R196P*G12VWTWTWTWTWTWT*X387_splice
    HCT 116WT*G13DWTWT*H1047RWT*R117Afs*41*S45delFusion
    LIM1215WTWTWTWTWTWTWT*T41A, Q177PNA
    LS1034*G245S, HD*A146T, AMPLWTWTWTWTWTWT*R39Gfs*4
    NCI-H508*R273HWTWT*G596R*E545K, AMPLWTWTWTFusion, HD
    NCI-H716*E224DR97IWTWTWTWT*H472Qfs*30WTWT
    RKOWTWTWT*V600E*H1047RWT*G659Vfs*41, H549NWTWT
    SNU-407*S90Pfs*33*G12DWTR726C*H1047RWTWT*T41A*K468Sfs*23, A549T, A419V
    SNU-C2B*R273Y*G12DWTWTD725GWT*C275Wfs*143WT*K468Sfs*23
    Quadruple wild type
    C10WTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWT
    C99WTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWT
    CAR1*V272MWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWT
    LS513WT*G12DWTE204L, E204V, E204*WTWTWTWTWT
    Display full size

    AMPL: amplified; HD: Homodeleted; WT: wild type; NA: not available; APC: adenomatous polyposis coli. * before a mutation denotes oncogenic. Data are from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE)

    V600E or other pathogenic BRAF mutations were observed in 3 of 11 (27.3%) quadruple mutated cell lines, in 3 of 13 (23.1%) cell lines of the APC only mutated group, in 2 of 9 (22.2%) cell lines of the triple mutated group, and no cell lines of the quadruple wild type group (Table 5). Overall, the colorectal cancer cell lines in the four groups capture to a significant degree, albeit with some variability, the corresponding prevalence of the pathogenic mutations in TP53, KRAS, and BRAF in patient samples (Figure 7). For example, pathogenic BRAF mutations were more frequent in cell lines of the quadruple altered and APC only altered groups than the corresponding patient samples, while in the triple altered group, where pathogenic BRAF mutations were most prevalent in patient samples, corresponding cell lines had a lower frequency of BRAF mutations (Figure 7).

    Prevalence of mutations in TP53, KRAS, and BRAF in patient samples and corresponding cell lines from colorectal cancers with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway alterations. Data for patient samples are from TCGA (the Cancer Genome Atlas) and for cell lines from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. APC: adenomatous polyposis coli

    Drug sensitivities in vitro

    Comparison of the sensitivities of the four groups of colorectal cancer cell lines to representative porcupine inhibitors, tankyrase inhibitors, and EGFR inhibitors was performed using data from the GDSC project. Although the small number of in vitro assayed cell lines prevented a formal statistical comparison from reaching significance, the two quadruple cell lines with data available seemed to be more sensitive to two of the three porcupine inhibitors tested, all three tankyrase inhibitors with data and to be more sensitive to the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib than cell lines from the other groups (Table 6).

    Sensitivities (mean IC50, μM) of colorectal cancer cell lines with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin pathway mutations to porcupine inhibitors, tankyrase inhibitors, and EGFR inhibitors

    GroupsPorcupine inhibitorsTNKRS inhibitorsEGFR inhibitors
    LGK974IWP-2Wnt-C59AZ6102MN-64WIKI4XAV939CetuximabErlotinib
    Quadruple mutated (n = 6)138.5 (77.9)33.31 (16.56)150.8 (136.6)25.39 (38.13)211.7 (84.2)79.01 (64.09)156.1 (76.8)543.5 (367.2)21.01 (33.74)
    APC only mutated (n = 7)130.04 (91.3)38.72 (28.7)168.02 (164.6)29.79 (48.04)218.3 (189.2)45.13 (22.23)175.2 (113.5)418.6 (494.4)30.67 (57.39)
    Triple mutated (n = 7)134.57 (94.1)37.01 (32.9)154.5 (122.2)15.31 (10.66)168.1 (135.8)66.79 (52.63)110.5 (40.7)657.1 (349.4)22.75 (16.56)
    Quadruple wild type (n = 2)64.05 (30.05)31.6 (0.91)135.5 (127.7)4.2 (2.82)110.5 (68.3)NA51.61 (62.8)838.9 (322.4)5.51 (4.32)
    ANOVAF = 0.4, P = 0.74F = 0.06, P = 0.97F = 0.03, P = 0.99F = 0.38, P = 0.76F = 0.4, P = 0.75F = 0.82, P = 0.45F = 1.5, P = 0.22F = 0.69, P = 0.56F = 0.23, P = 0.87
    Display full size

    Standard deviations (SD) are shown in parentheses. Data are from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) project. NA: not available; APC: adenomatous polyposis coli

    RNAi and CRISPR arrays showed that knock out or knock down of at least one of the four WNT/β-catenin pathway genes of interest (APC, RNF43, CTNNB1, and TCF7L2) in all but one of the cell lines of the quadruple mutated group produced significant growth delay gene effect (Z-score < –2.5). Most cell lines of the group were sensitive to the knock out or knock down of CTNNB1 (Tables 7 and 8). In the group of APC only altered colorectal cancer cell lines, knock out or knock down of APC had in general no significant effect. In contrast, growth delay was observed with RNAi knock down and even more with CRISPR knock out of CTNNB1 and TCF7L2, which are downstream of the pathway defect in these cells (Tables 7 and 8). Some cell lines of the triple altered group were also sensitive to knock out or knock down of CTNNB1 and TCF7L2, but others were resistant to all four genes knock out or knock down. Data for quadruple wild type cell lines were limited and were available for one cell line for RNAi and three cell lines for CRISPR (Tables 7 and 8). Cell line LS513 displayed sensitivity to knock out and knock down of TCF7L2 (Z-score < –2.5), while cell lines C10 and C99 appeared to be resistant to knock down of all four genes.

    RNA interference (RNAi) in colorectal cancer cell lines with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin pathway mutations

    Cell lineAPCRNF43CTNNB1TCF7L2
    Gene effectZ-scoreRankGene effectZ-scoreRankGene effectZ-scoreRankGene effectZ-scoreRank
    Quadruple mutated
    CL-34–0.58–2.678–0.18–0.571,040–1.87–3.014–0.3–1.12275
    CW-2–0.18–0.892,2850.32.77,993–4.71–8.33–0.61–2.66354
    GP2d–0.82–3.784–0.15–0.43,379–2.06–3.367–0.16–0.413,310
    HCT-150.050.235,480–0.010.556,368–1.94–3.14970.060.716,728
    KM12–0.28–1.3790–0.2–0.672,741–1.8–2.8928–0.11–0.175,904
    LoVo–0.42–1.93254–0.19–0.613,380–1.66–2.6345–0.14–0.35,135
    LS411N–0.51–2.35159–0.02–0.528,767–2.18–3.6210.020.518,707
    SNU-C2A0.542.4612,975–0.060.248,690–0.170.158,195–0.28–12,370
    SNU-C4–0.38–1.79101–0.16–0.461,606–2.04–3.3416–0.27–0.94550
    APC only mutated
    CACO20.080.3410,937–0.16–0.416,307–0.91–1.232,2200.110.9613,729
    COLO 201–0.18–0.852,3240.0090.735,956–2–3.2107–1.35–6.345
    MDST80.080.364,4530.071.176,420–0.64–0.731,816–0.16–0.432,428
    SK-CO-1–0.72–3.31280.040.9911,450–1.65–2.664–0.47–1.97177
    SW1417–0.18–0.861,711–0.19–0.662,3230.090.659,553–0.3–1.121,075
    Triple mutated
    HCT 116–0.05–0.274,669–0.2–0.692,279–0.56–0.582,766–0.28–0.991,297
    NCI-H508–0.11–0.533,510–0.26–1.081,563–1.13–1.64509–0.72–3.2310
    NCI-H7160.050.237,7440.04111,047–0.120.237,7580.10.9210,816
    RKO0.070.298,335–0.15–0.363,192–0.050.368,9620.030.5610,424
    SNU-4070.20.896,985–0.17–0.483,041–2.84–4.837–0.68–3.0368
    Quadruple wild type
    LS513–0.28–1.321,188–0.020.478,506–1.63–2.57107–0.63–2.7566
    Display full size

    Data were from project Achilles, Drive, Marcotte DEMETER2. The Z-score was computed as the gene effect minus the mean across cell line models divided by the standard deviation (SD). Not all cell lines of the original cohorts had data available in the RNAi arrays. APC: adenomatous polyposis coli

    Gene knocks out with CRISPR in colorectal cancer cell lines with or without APC and other WNT/β-catenin pathway mutations

    Cell lineAPCRNF43CTNNB1TCF7L2
    Gene effectZ-scoreRankGene effectZ-scoreRankGene effectZ-scoreRankGene effectZ-scoreRank
    Quadruple mutated
    HCT-15–0.270.2310,419–0.07–0.73,831–1.36–3.081220.090.7513,906
    KM12–0.210.4512,7770.191.6717,604–1.42–3.2215–0.25–0.653,705
    LoVo–0.44–0.425,884–0.12–1.112,469–1.16–2.54189–0.47–1.551,284
    LS411N–0.130.7612,0950.030.259,534–2.51–6.1519–0.6–2.091,222
    SNU-C4–0.61–1.062,2180.131.1315,995–1.72–4.0411–1–3.6921
    SNU-C5–0.35–0.087,663–0.04–0.425,354–0.32–0.276,313–0.22–0.554,629
    APC only mutated
    C75–0.130.7512,6810.211.916,539–1.2–2.64477–0.92–3.37155
    C800.131.8216,873–0.006–0.098,039–1.12–2.42456–0.71–2.5401
    C84–0.76–1.661,2040.060.5311,781–2.11–5.094–0.79–2.84174
    COLO 201–0.280.1810,6920.060.5614,017–1.9–4.5214–0.91–3.3237
    DiFi–0.051.0613,4040.10.912,728–1.08–2.31924–0.6–2.091,219
    HCC2998–0.35–0.077,755–0.02–0.266,743–1.58–3.65195–0.69–2.44746
    MDST8–0.39–0.246,9130.060.5112,398–0.89–1.82777–0.050.139,717
    SW1116–0.43–0.374,9100.030.3212,360–0.35–0.364,978–0.74–2.6273
    Triple mutated
    HCC-560.051.5116,7950.10.8814,525–0.53–0.843,428–0.71–2.52182
    HCT 116–0.120.8113,6950.050.4111,203–0.61–1.072,413–0.52–1.75953
    LS10340.282.3817,4890.232.0317,082–1.71–4.0143–1.03–3.7863
    NCI-H716–0.34–0.057,9580.040.4110,8780.010.6112,0690.090.7212,712
    RKO0.011.3617,7730.070.6615,835–0.060.413,860–0.020.2312,188
    Quadruple wild type
    C10–0.72–1.511,919–0.01–0.147,219–0.050.4410,809–0.080.018,181
    C99–0.250.310,6910.020.159,788–1.09–2.35563–0.52–1.751,355
    LS513–0.180.5712,725–0.09–0.853,479–1–2.11496–0.77–2.75176
    Display full size

    Data are from the DepMap, Public 24Q2+Score, and Chronos projects. The Z-score was computed as the gene effect minus the mean across cell line models divided by the standard deviation (SD). Not all cell lines of the original cohorts had data available in the CRISPR arrays. APC: adenomatous polyposis coli

    Discussion

    The WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway provides physiologic signals for the maintenance of the stem cells in the intestinal crypts [31]. Paneth cells in the crypts as well as mesenchymal cells surrounding the crypt epithelium secrete ligands of the pathway and lead to the physiologic activation of cell proliferation of the stem cells through cyclin D induction. Activation signals and the activity status of the WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway decrease with increasing distance from the bottom of the crypt and along the intestinal villi. In contrast, the gradient of activity of the bone morphogenic protein (BMP) signaling pathway, which counteracts WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway activity and promotes differentiation, increases from the bottom of the crypt and towards the tip of villi [31]. In addition to WNT/β-catenin activity, the crypt micro-environment displays increased activity of the EGFR pathway. EGFR signals are critical for the proliferation of intestinal stem cells, as well as for orchestrating metabolic processes [32, 33]. In colorectal cancer, the WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway is aberrantly activated through mutations in APC and less frequently mutations in other pathway genes, which result in autonomous signaling without external signals from the micro-environment through receptor ligation [34]. The deregulated activity of the pathway endows cancer cells with properties of stem cells such as increased self-renewal, increased proliferation potential, and drug resistance [35]. Therefore, inhibition of the aberrantly activated pathway could be a rational target for colorectal cancer therapies.

    In the current investigation, the genomic landscape of sub-sets of colorectal cancers based on the presence of alterations in four key WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway genes has been established using data from the colorectal cancer cohort of TCGA. Therapeutic sensitivities to drugs inhibiting the pathway were explored in cell lines, according to the presence of WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway alterations. It was discovered that colorectal cancers possessed significant differences in their genomic profile dependent on whether the WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway was activated through alterations in APC or through alterations in three alternative genes of the pathway, RNF43, CTNNB1, and TCF7L2. Colorectal cancers with alterations in RNF43, CTNNB1, and TCF7L2 without APC alterations presented more commonly MSI and a high TMB. In addition, cancers with alterations in RNF43, CTNNB1, and TCF7L2 displayed high rates of mutations in receptor tyrosine kinases, MMR-associated genes and DDR-associated genes, independently of the presence or absence of concomitant APC alterations. Cell lines of colorectal cancer origin partially recapitulated the landscape of WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway alterations, being more frequently mutated for APC than the other genes of the pathway, but some features of the patient sample groups were not well represented. For example, cell lines of the quadruple altered group were mostly MSI high, while MSI high cases comprised 22.1% of the patient samples in the quadruple altered group. In addition, the prevalence of BRAF mutations in triple altered cell lines was not higher than the prevalence in quadruple altered and APC only altered cell lines, in contrast to patient samples where the prevalence of BRAF mutations in triple altered cases were significantly higher than in the other groups. This divergence of the molecular landscape between patient samples and cell lines needs to be considered when evaluating studies based on cell lines. Studies of in vitro sensitivity to inhibitors of the WNT/β-catenin pathway and EGFR inhibitors were limited by the small number of cell lines, but a numerical greater sensitivity of wild type cell lines for the key genes of the WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway to several of these inhibitors was observed. RNAi and CRISPR arrays suggested the sensitivity of quadruple mutant cell lines to knock down or knock out of APC or other genes of the pathway, while APC only altered cell lines were mostly resistant to APC knock down or knock out but sensitive to knock down or knock out of other genes of the pathway, especially CTNNB1, encoding for β-catenin. These data confirm that the specific alterations in the WNT/β-catenin/APC pathway modulate sensitivities to additional interventions affecting pathway activity.

    Drugs inhibiting two types of enzymes that function in the activation of the WNT/β-catenin pathway, porcupine and tankyrases 1 and 2 have been included in the panel of drugs tested in the GDSC [19]. Porcupine is a membrane-bound o-acyltransferase which is a crucial enzyme for the lipidation of ligands of the WNT pathway, a process that is a prerequisite for their secretion and subsequent receptor binding for signaling [36]. Inhibitors of the enzyme have progressed to early-phase clinical trials. The inhibitor WNT974 was studied in combination with encorafenib and cetuximab in a phase Ib/II trial of patients with BRAF V600E mutated, KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer [37]. Selection for alterations in the WNT/β-catenin pathway was not performed in this trial. The triple combination showed a low overall response rate of 10%. In addition, serious adverse events including several patients with bone fractures, as well as hypercalcemia and pleural effusions were observed. Fractures are an on-target adverse effect, as WNT signaling is involved in trabecular bone formation and prevention of resorption [38]. Therefore, more advanced trial development of the drug was interrupted.

    Tankyrases 1 and 2, also called PARP5A and PARP5B, are enzymes of the PARP family that perform the enzymatic PARylation promoting subsequent axin ubiquitination and degradation, and, as a result, β-catenin stabilization [39]. Phosphorylation of axin by Casein kinase 1 is a negative regulator of the WNT/β-catenin signaling. This phosphorylation of axin involves the same site as PARylation and prevents PARylation by tankyrases [40]. Moreover, tankyrases have additional enzymatic targets, including PTEN, angiomotins, and DNA-associated protein kinase (DNA-PK), through which they promote the activity of PI3K/AKT pathway, the YAP pathway and DNA repair by the error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) mechanism. Therefore, discovery of clinical-grade tankyrase inhibitors has been prioritized as a potential anti-cancer therapeutic strategy with several compounds examined in pre-clinical studies [39, 41]. For example, the inhibitors XAV939 and IWR-1 have been effective in inhibiting β-catenin transcription activity by promoting its degradation in colorectal cancer cells [42].

    Blocking the WNT/β-catenin pathway at the level of ligand secretion or enhancing β-catenin destruction in colorectal cancers with APC mutations may not be the most effective strategies, as deregulated signaling is independent of pathway receptor engagement with ligands and the destruction complex assembly is already defective. Approaches to block the WNT/β-catenin pathway in cancers with APC mutations, such as the great majority of colorectal cancers, would require inhibitors of processes downstream of the defective β-catenin destructive complex. In this vein, inhibitors of the TRAF2 and NCK interacting protein kinase (TNIK), which regulates the TCF7L2/β-catenin transcription complex, and inhibitors of the interaction of β-catenin with acetyltransferase CBP have been discovered [43]. TCF7L2 is a target for phosphorylation by kinase TNIK and this phosphorylation is crucial for transcription of target genes of the TCF7L2/β-catenin complex [44]. TNIK is also involved in other cancer-associated processes through alternative targets including AKT signaling, autophagy and the epithelial to mesenchymal transition, and modulation of these processes would also have to be considered when targeting the kinase. Moreover, it would be of interest to investigate how pathogenic or non-pathogenic TCF7L2 mutations affect the sensitivity of cancer cells to TNIK inhibitors. In contrast to cancers with APC or other defects in the β-catenin destruction complex, colorectal cancers with RNF43 mutations may retain WNT pathway ligands dependence and may as a result be better targets for porcupine and tankyrase inhibitors [45].

    In conclusion, therapeutic inhibition of the WNT/β-catenin pathway in colorectal cancers, which possess in their majority APC mutations but also present, in a significant minority of cases, mutations in other key proteins of the pathway, needs to be developed with these specific alterations taken into consideration. The specific alteration of the WNT/β-catenin pathway present in a given colorectal cancer is of significant importance given that different proteins of the pathway play additional roles in cancer-associated cellular functions independent of WNT signaling. For example, APC has function in mitotic spindle integrity and cell cycle control [46]. In another example, β-catenin has roles, beyond the WNT pathway, in cell adhesion and transcription cooperation with other pathways [47]. Data presented here may suggest that inhibitors that act at or upstream of the β-catenin destruction complex are more effective for the minority of colorectal cancers with no alterations in the main proteins of the WNT/β-catenin pathway. A rational development strategy for these inhibitors selecting patients according to the presence or absence of target pathway alterations may increase the chances of therapeutic success.

    Abbreviations

    APC:

    adenomatous polyposis coli

    AS:

    aneuploidy score

    CCLE:

    Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia

    CIN:

    chromosomal instability

    CRISPR:

    Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

    GDSC:

    Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer

    GISTIC:

    Genomic Identification of Significant Targets in Cancer

    MMR:

    mismatch repair

    MSI:

    microsatellite instability

    RNAi:

    RNA interference

    TCGA:

    the Cancer Genome Atlas

    TMB:

    tumor mutation burden

    TNIK:

    TRAF2 and NCK interacting protein kinase

    Declarations

    Author contributions

    IAV: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing.

    Conflicts of interest

    The author declares that there have no conflicts of interest.

    Ethical approval

    The study was an analysis of previously published data and was exempt from approval by an Ethics Committee.

    Consent to participate

    The study was an analysis of previously published data and informed consent was not required or obtained.

    Consent to publication

    Not applicable.

    Availability of data and materials

    The datasets analyzed for this study can be found in the Cancer Genome Atlas [http://www.cancer.gov/ccg/]; Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia [http://www.sites.broadintitute.org/ccle/]; Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) project [http://www.cancerrxgene.org]; project Achilles, Drive, Marcotte DEMETER2 [http://www.depmap.org/portal/achilles]; DepMap, Public 24Q2+Score, and Chronos projects [http://www.depmap.org].

    Funding

    Not applicable.

    Copyright

    © The Author(s) 2025.

    Publisher’s note

    Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.

    References

    Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:1249. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:203. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Arnold M, Abnet CC, Neale RE, Vignat J, Giovannucci EL, McGlynn KA, et al. Global Burden of 5 Major Types of Gastrointestinal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:33549.e15. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, Arain MA, Chen YJ, Ciombor KK, et al. Colon Cancer, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19:32959. [DOI] [PubMed]
    André T, Shiu K, Kim TW, Jensen BV, Jensen LH, Punt C, et al.; KEYNOTE-177 Investigators. Pembrolizumab in Microsatellite-Instability-High Advanced Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:220718. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Kopetz S, Grothey A, Yaeger R, Cutsem EV, Desai J, Yoshino T, et al. Encorafenib, Binimetinib, and Cetuximab in BRAF V600E-Mutated Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:163243. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Siena S, Bartolomeo MD, Raghav K, Masuishi T, Loupakis F, Kawakami H, et al.; DESTINY-CRC01 investigators. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) in patients with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (DESTINY-CRC01): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:77989. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Yaeger R, Weiss J, Pelster MS, Spira AI, Barve M, Ou SI, et al. Adagrasib with or without Cetuximab in Colorectal Cancer with Mutated KRAS G12C. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:4454. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Pathak PS, Chan G, Deming DA, Chee CE. State-of-the-Art Management of Colorectal Cancer: Treatment Advances and Innovation. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2024;44:e438466. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Voutsadakis IA. KRAS mutated colorectal cancers with or without PIK3CA mutations: Clinical and molecular profiles inform current and future therapeutics. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2023;186:103987. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Fasano M, Pirozzi M, Miceli CC, Cocule M, Caraglia M, Boccellino M, et al. TGF-β Modulated Pathways in Colorectal Cancer: New Potential Therapeutic Opportunities. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:7400. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Fujita M, Demizu Y. Advances in the development of Wnt/β-catenin signaling inhibitors. [Epub ahead of print]. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 02]. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 2012;487:3307. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Giannakis M, Mu XJ, Shukla SA, Qian ZR, Cohen O, Nishihara R, et al. Genomic Correlates of Immune-Cell Infiltrates in Colorectal Carcinoma. Cell Rep. 2016;15:85765. Erratum in: Cell Rep. 2016;17:1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Voutsadakis IA. The ubiquitin-proteasome system in colorectal cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1782:8008. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Hankey W, Frankel WL, Groden J. Functions of the APC tumor suppressor protein dependent and independent of canonical WNT signaling: implications for therapeutic targeting. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2018;37:15972. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Ellrott K, Bailey MH, Saksena G, Covington KR, Kandoth C, Stewart C, et al.; MC3 Working Group; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Scalable Open Science Approach for Mutation Calling of Tumor Exomes Using Multiple Genomic Pipelines. Cell Syst. 2018;6:27181.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Mermel CH, Schumacher SE, Hill B, Meyerson ML, Beroukhim R, Getz G. GISTIC2.0 facilitates sensitive and confident localization of the targets of focal somatic copy-number alteration in human cancers. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R41. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Carter SL, Cibulskis K, Helman E, McKenna A, Shen H, Zack T, et al. Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:41321. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Barretina J, Caponigro G, Stransky N, Venkatesan K, Margolin AA, Kim S, et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature. 2012;483:6037. Erratum in: Nature. 2012;492:290. Erratum in: Nature. 2019;565:E5–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Iorio F, Knijnenburg TA, Vis DJ, Bignell GR, Menden MP, Schubert M, et al. A Landscape of Pharmacogenomic Interactions in Cancer. Cell. 2016;166:74054. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Behan FM, Iorio F, Picco G, Gonçalves E, Beaver CM, Migliardi G, et al. Prioritization of cancer therapeutic targets using CRISPR-Cas9 screens. Nature. 2019;568:5116. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Boehm JS, Garnett MJ, Adams DJ, Francies HE, Golub TR, Hahn WC, et al. Cancer research needs a better map. Nature. 2021;589:5146. [DOI] [PubMed]
    van der Meer D, Barthorpe S, Yang W, Lightfoot H, Hall C, Gilbert J, et al. Cell Model Passports-a hub for clinical, genetic and functional datasets of preclinical cancer models. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D9239. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Tsherniak A, Vazquez F, Montgomery PG, Weir BA, Kryukov G, Cowley GS, et al. Defining a Cancer Dependency Map. Cell. 2017;170:56476.e16. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Marcotte R, Sayad A, Brown KR, Sanchez-Garcia F, Reimand J, Haider M, et al. Functional Genomic Landscape of Human Breast Cancer Drivers, Vulnerabilities, and Resistance. Cell. 2016;164:293309. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Dwane L, Behan FM, Gonçalves E, Lightfoot H, Yang W, van der Meer D, et al. Project Score database: a resource for investigating cancer cell dependencies and prioritizing therapeutic targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D136572. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Meyers RM, Bryan JG, McFarland JM, Weir BA, Sizemore AE, Xu H, et al. Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells. Nat Genet. 2017;49:177984. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Dempster JM, Boyle I, Vazquez F, Root DE, Boehm JS, Hahn WC, et al. Chronos: a cell population dynamics model of CRISPR experiments that improves inference of gene fitness effects. Genome Biol. 2021;22:343. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:4014. Erratum in: Cancer Discov. 2012;2:960. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6:pl1. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Baulies A, Angelis N, Li VSW. Hallmarks of intestinal stem cells. Development. 2020;147:dev182675. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Basak O, Beumer J, Wiebrands K, Seno H, Oudenaarden Av, Clevers H. Induced Quiescence of Lgr5+ Stem Cells in Intestinal Organoids Enables Differentiation of Hormone-Producing Enteroendocrine Cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20:17790.e4. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Zhang C, Jin Y, Marchetti M, Lewis MR, Hammouda OT, Edgar BA. EGFR signaling activates intestinal stem cells by promoting mitochondrial biogenesis and β-oxidation. Curr Biol. 2022;32:370419.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Voutsadakis IA. Pathogenesis of colorectal carcinoma and therapeutic implications: the roles of the ubiquitin-proteasome system and Cox-2. J Cell Mol Med. 2007;11:25285. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Perochon J, Carroll LR, Cordero JB. Wnt Signalling in Intestinal Stem Cells: Lessons from Mice and Flies. Genes (Basel). 2018;9:138. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Voutsadakis IA. Molecular Alterations and Putative Therapeutic Targeting of Planar Cell Polarity Proteins in Breast Cancer. J Clin Med. 2023;12:411. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Tabernero J, Cutsem EV, Garralda E, Tai D, Braud FD, Geva R, et al. A Phase Ib/II Study of WNT974 + Encorafenib + Cetuximab in Patients With BRAFV600E-Mutant KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Oncologist. 2023;28:2308. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Lung H, Wentworth KL, Moody T, Zamarioli A, Ram A, Ganesh G, et al. Wnt pathway inhibition with the porcupine inhibitor LGK974 decreases trabecular bone but not fibrosis in a murine model with fibrotic bone. JBMR Plus. 2024;8:ziae011. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Kim MK. Novel insight into the function of tankyrase. Oncol Lett. 2018;16:6895902. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Klement K, Brückner M, Bernkopf DB. Phosphorylation of axin within biomolecular condensates counteracts its tankyrase-mediated degradation. J Cell Sci. 2023;136:jcs261214. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Fearon ER. PARsing the phrase “all in for Axin” - Wnt pathway targets in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:3668. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Huang SA, Mishina YM, Liu S, Cheung A, Stegmeier F, Michaud GA, et al. Tankyrase inhibition stabilizes axin and antagonizes Wnt signalling. Nature. 2009;461:61420. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Masuda M, Sawa M, Yamada T. Therapeutic targets in the Wnt signaling pathway: Feasibility of targeting TNIK in colorectal cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2015;156:19. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Shitashige M, Satow R, Jigami T, Aoki K, Honda K, Shibata T, et al. Traf2- and Nck-interacting kinase is essential for Wnt signaling and colorectal cancer growth. Cancer Res. 2010;70:502433. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Yamamoto D, Oshima H, Wang D, Takeda H, Kita K, Lei X, et al. Characterization of RNF43 frameshift mutations that drive Wnt ligand- and R-spondin-dependent colon cancer. J Pathol. 2022;257:3952. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Stefanski CD, Prosperi JR. Wnt-Independent and Wnt-Dependent Effects of APC Loss on the Chemotherapeutic Response. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:7844. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Lessey LR, Robinson SC, Chaudhary R, Daniel JM. Adherens junction proteins on the move-From the membrane to the nucleus in intestinal diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:998373. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]