• Open Access
    Original Article

    Association of TGFBR2 gene polymorphisms (rs6785358 and rs764522) with congenital heart disease susceptibility in Egyptians

    Nahed Dawood 1
    El-Shaimaa Shabana 2
    Ashraf A.H. El-Midany 3
    Faten R. Abdelghaffar 1
    Islam El-Garawani 1*
    Rizk Elbaz 2

    Explor Med. 2024;5:148–157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37349/emed.2024.00212

    Received: November 17, 2023 Accepted: January 30, 2024 Published: March 29, 2024

    Academic Editor: Guo-Chang Fan, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, USA

    Abstract

    Aim:

    Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) receptor II (TGFBR2) is a basic constituent of TGF-β signalling pathway and is important in heart development. This study investigates the relationship between TGFBR2 gene variance and congenital heart defects (CHD) among Egyptians.

    Methods:

    The study involved 75 CHD-affected subjects and 100 healthy controls. Genotyping of two selected tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (tagSNPs, rs6785358, rs764522) within the TGFBR2 gene was conducted using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method (PCR-RFLP) assays.

    Results:

    Significant genotype differences were found for rs764522 and rs6785358 (P < 0.05). In the case of rs6785358, the G/G genotype was more prevalent in cases than controls (18.7% vs. 4.0%). This significance was observed in both the codominant model [A/A vs. A/G vs. G/G; odds ratio (OR) = 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.06–0.66, P = 0.0073] and the recessive model (A/A + A/G vs. G/G; OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.06–0.60, P = 0.0018). For rs764522, the G/G genotype was more prevalent in cases than controls (21.3% vs. 0.0%). Significant associations were observed in the codominant model (C/C vs. C/G vs. G/G; OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.02–0.90, P < 0.0001), as well as in the dominant model (C/C vs. C/G + G/G) and recessive model (C/C + C/G vs. G/G; P < 0.0001). Gender-specific analysis indicated that the C/G genotype was less common in male cases compared to females and controls (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.07–0.84). For rs6785358, the G/G genotype frequency was higher in male cases compared to females and controls (OR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.01–0.88 and OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.05–0.94, respectively).

    Conclusions:

    These findings indicate that TGFBR2 gene SNPs (rs6785358 and rs764522) may be risk factors for CHD in Egyptians.

    Keywords

    Transforming growth factor beta receptor II (TGFBR2), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), congenital heart disease, case-control study

    Introduction

    Congenital heart defects (CHD) are structural issues with the heart that exist at birth [1]. These abnormalities can affect the heart’s chambers, valves, or blood vessels that transport blood to and from the heart. The defects are frequently found alone or in combination with other defects [2, 3]. Physiologically, they are classified as cyanotic and acyanotic heart defects [4]. Cardiac abnormalities can range in complexity from simple that have no symptoms to complex lesions that have significant, life-threatening symptoms [5]. Congenital birth malformations can arise in children for a variety of reasons [6]. According to previous studies, genetic factors may be the primary cause of CHD [7].

    Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) receptor II (TGFBR2), a transmembrane protein, is a member of the serine/threonine protein kinase family and the TGFBR subfamily with a molecular weight of 70/80 kDa [8]. The TGFBR2 gene, which is found on chromosome 3p22 and has seven exons and a 567 codon open reading frame, is responsible for encoding the TGFBR2 protein [9]. The TGF-β ligands bind to the TGFBR2 for the initiation of TGF-β signalling leading to the activation of the TGFBR1, which then causes the translocation to the nucleus following a series of processes, including phosphorylation of mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2 (SMAD2) and SMAD3 with the association of SMAD4. SMAD proteins are involved in managing transcription of target genes which can be affected by TGFBR2 inactivation [10]. The TGFBR2 gene mutation in aortic pathology has been reported, and during cardiac development, the endothelial cells might be affected by TGFB signalling through TGFBR2 [11]. The valvuloseptal heart defect may occur due to disruptions in the signal transformation of endocardial cushions [12]. TGFBR2 is expressed during heart development in embryonic myocytes, endothelial cells, and endocardial cushion of mice [13].

    It is known that genetic polymorphisms may have an impact on the susceptibility or resistance to certain infections [14] or have a key role in the contribution of the susceptibility to some diseases [15, 16] and personalized nutrition [17]. The relation between TGFBR2 gene polymorphisms (rs6785358 and rs764522), the 5’ upstream were also named -3779A/G and -1444C/G, respectively, and some disorders, such as Marfan syndrome and cardiac arrest, were reported [18, 19].

    This study aims to explore the link between TGFBR2 gene polymorphisms (rs6785358 and rs764522) and CHD in Egyptians. To our knowledge, among the studied population, this is the first report focusing on this issue.

    Materials and methods

    This study involved 75 cases affected by CHD, 21 had atrial septal defect (ASD), 43 had ventricular septal defect (VSD), and 11 had tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), from the Department of Cardiology, Internal Medicine Specialized Hospital, Mansoura University, Egypt. While normal controls were enrolled via invitations.

    Samples collection

    Peripheral blood samples were taken in sterile EDTA tubes (Kemico Vacutainer, Egypt) for genotyping and hematological evaluations. Additionally, blood aliquots were taken in serum tubes for other laboratory tests. Sera were stored at –20°C until use. All samples were identified and given matched numbers that corresponded to all investigations.

    Laboratory investigations

    Physical inspections and routine questionnaires were done for all patients. Hematological parameters, such as hemoglobin, white blood cells (WBCs), and platelets, were investigated using Sysmex KX21 Hematology Analyzer (Sysmex Corporation, Japan). Other standard biochemical analyses, such as fasting blood sugar, aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), urea, and creatinine (Biosystem, Spain), were performed.

    Single nucleotide polymorphisms selection

    Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) under investigation were selected according to PubMed published data (SNP database). To see if the promoter region harboured any genetic variants susceptible to CHD, we chose two tagSNPs, 5’ upstream, of the TGFBR2 gene (rs6785358 and rs764522).

    Isolation of total genomic DNA

    In an EDTA-containing tube, approximately 4 mL of venous blood samples were collected. Genomic DNA extraction was done from samples using the phenol-chloroform method in the presence of proteinase K digestion (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). Using a UV spectrophotometer (Spectronic 1201, Milton Roy, USA), the absorbance at 260 nm was used for DNA concentration, however, the A260/A280 nm was used for purity determination.

    Genotype assessment

    To examine the allelic variance, the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay was done. The primer sequences of the rs6785358 were 5’-GAACTGCAAACAAGAGAATGGAT-3’ (forward) and 5’-TTAGAATTCTACCCTAATGATTGTAAGG-3’ (reverse), however, the rs764522 primers were 5’-GAGTGAAAGAGCCCAGAACG-3’ (forward) and 5’-GGGCTAGGCATCTTCTTTCC-3’ (reverse) [13]. A total volume of 10 μL of PCR reaction containing 10 ng of DNA, 0.5 pmol of each primer, and 1 × PCR master mix was prepared. Using an GeneAmpTM PCR System 9700 (Thermo Fisher, USA), the amplifications were accomplished. The reaction program proceeded as follows: one cycle for 5 min at 95°C, 30 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 30 s for annealing at 61°C (rs6785358)/63°C (rs764522), and 30 s at 72°C.

    A final extension cycle at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were digested using the restriction enzymes BsuRI and MvaI (Thermo Fisher, USA), for rs6785358 and rs764522, respectively [13].

    Statistical analysis

    Fisher’s exact χ2 test was used for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium assessment (HWE 14 program in SPSS). The SPSS for Windows version 13.0 (SPSS Inc, USA) was used for performing statistical analyses. The Chi-square (χ2) test was done for the analysis of allelic variation among studied subject groups. The relation was illustrated as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the risk. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05 (two tails). Also, Binary logistic regression was done for the association between different variables and the disease status.

    Results

    Demographic and clinical characteristics

    The characteristics of the cases (n = 75), and control (n = 100) groups are listed in Table 1. Regarding age or sex, the demographic results revealed a non-significant difference between the studied groups (P > 0.05). However, non-significant differences among studied groups regarding all laboratory investigations (P > 0.05) were noticed, except AST, hemoglobin, and platelets (P < 0.05).

    Demographic and laboratory data of the studied groups

    Parameter

    Controls

    (n = 100)

    CHD

    (n = 75)

    P-value
    Age (years)4.59 ± 2.344.56 ± 2.300.934 (t-test)
    Sex0.300 (χ2)

            Female

            Male

    55 (55%)

    45 (45%)

    35 (47%)

    40 (53%)

    Hb (mg/dL)11.91 ± 0.6086.01 ± 5.000.001*
    WBCs × 1036.28 ± 0.626.40 ± 0.620.212
    Platelets × 103246.70 ± 31.96261.38 ± 45.980.014*
    FBS (mg/dL)86.07 ± 5.6686.01 ± 5.000.945
    ALT (U/L)23.03 ± 2.9023.92 ± 3.320.061
    AST (U/L)25.27 ± 2.9127.82 ± 6.720.001*
    Urea (mg/dL)24.59 ± 3.4724.09 ± 3.610.359
    Creatinine (mg/dL)0.53 ± 0.090.50 ± 0.110.050
    Display full size

    FBS: fasting blood sugar; Hb: hemoglobin; *: P-value significant < 0.05. Data were illustrated as mean ± standard deviation (SD)

    Genotyping and agarose gel electrophoresis for rs764522

    The MvaI-digested PCR fragments were separated using the agarose gel electrophoresis method. The PCR amplicon was seen at 192 bp. For rs764522, the C allele was not digested and appeared as a single band at 192 bp. However, the G allele strand was digested into 41 bp and 151 bp fragments.

    In Table 2, there are different models for testing the association of TGFBR2 rs764522 gene polymorphism with CHD. Herein, the G/G genotype frequency is much higher among cases compared to controls (21.3% vs. 0.0%). This might imply that the G/G genotype is a predisposing factor to the occurrence of CHD. A positive significance in the codominant model (C/C vs. C/G vs. G/G; OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.02–0.90, P < 0.0001) was noticed, as well as, in the dominant model (C/C vs. C/G + G/G) and recessive one (C/C + C/G vs. G/G; P < 0.0001).

    Testing genetic association of TGFBR2 (rs764522) gene polymorphism with CHD (n = 175, adjusted by sex)

    Genotypic statesGenotypeCasesControlsOR (95% CI)P-value
    CodominantC/C14 (18.7%)40 (40.0%)1.00< 0.0001*
    C/G45 (60%)60 (60%)0.43 (0.20–0.90)
    G/G16 (21.3%)0 (0.0%)0.00 (0.00–NA)
    DominantC/C14 (18.7%)40 (40.0%)1.000.001*
    C/G + G/G61 (81.3%)60 (60.0%)0.31 (0.15–0.65)
    RecessiveC/C + C/G59 (78.7%)100 (100.0%)1.00< 0.0001*
    G/G16 (21.3%)0 (0.0%)0.00 (0.00–NA)
    OverdominantC/C + G/G30 (40%)40 (40%)1.000.86
    C/G45 (60%)60 (60%)0.94 (0.51–1.76)
    Display full size

    NA: not applicable; *: P-value significant < 0.05

    The TGFBR2 (rs764522) gene polymorphism cross interaction with gender of cases and controls is displayed in Table 3. The genotype C/G frequency was noticed to be lower in male cases than in females and controls (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.07–0.84).

    TGFBR2 (rs764522) gene polymorphism cross interaction with gender of cases and controls (n = 175, crude analysis)

    TGFBR2 (rs764522) genotypeFemaleMale
    CasesControlsOR (95% CI)CasesControlsOR (95% CI)
    C/C4181.0010220.49 (0.13–1.82)
    C/G24370.34 (0.10–1.14)21230.24 (0.07–0.84)
    G/G700.00900.00
    P-valueP < 0.0001*P = 0.0013*
    Display full size

    *: P-value significant < 0.05

    In Table 4, the TGFBR2 (rs764522) gene polymorphic genotypes are revealed among cases of different types of CHDs compared to controls. The C/C genotype frequency in the VSD cases was much lower compared to controls (14% vs. 40%). On the other hand, the G/G genotype frequency was higher in ASD cases compared to controls (20.9% vs. 0.0%) with a significant statistical difference (P < 0.0001).

    TGFBR2 (rs764522) gene polymorphic genotypes among different types of CHD cases compared to controls

    TGFBR2 (rs764522) genotypeControlsVSDASDTOFTotal
    C/C4064454
    40.0%14.0%19.0%36.4%30.9%
    G/G095216
    0.0%20.9%23.8%18.2%9.1%
    C/G6028125105
    60.0%65.1%57.1%45.5%60.0%
    Fisher’s exact test – P-value34.143 – P < 0.0001*
    Display full size

    *: P-value significant < 0.05

    Genotyping and agarose gel electrophoresis for rs6785358

    For rs6785358, the BsuRI-digested PCR products were resolved on agarose electrophoresis. The results revealed that the A allele remained intact as a single 176 bp band. However, the G allele strand was digested into 147 bp and 29 bp fragments.

    The different models for testing the association of TGFBR2 (rs6785358) gene polymorphism with CHD are given in Table 5. The results revealed that the G/G genotype frequency is much higher among cases compared to controls (18.7% vs. 4.0%, respectively). This might imply that this genotype is a predisposing factor to the occurrence of CHDs. Moreover, a positive significance in the codominant model (A/A vs. A/G vs. G/G; OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.06–0.66, P = 0.0073) was noticed, as well as in the recessive model (A/A + A/G vs. G/G; OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.06–0.60, P = 0.0018).

    Testing genetic association of TGFBR2 (rs6785358) gene polymorphism with CHD (n = 175, adjusted by sex)

    Genotypic statesGenotypeCasesControlsOR (95% CI)P-value
    CodominantA/A31 (41.3%)46 (46.0%)1.000.0073*
    A/G30 (40%)50 (50%)1.13 (0.59–2.14)
    G/G14 (18.7%)4 (4.0%)0.20 (0.06–0.66)
    DominantA/A31 (41.3%)46 (46.0%)1.000.56
    A/G + G/G44 (58.7%)54 (54.0%)0.83 (0.46–1.53)
    RecessiveA/A + A/G61 (81.3%)96 (96.0%)1.000.0018*
    G/G14 (18.7%)4 (4.0%)0.19 (0.06–0.60)
    OverdominantA/A + G/G45 (60%)50 (50%)1.000.19
    A/G30 (40%)50 (50%)1.49 (0.81–2.74)
    Display full size

    *: P-value significant < 0.05

    The TGFBR2 (rs6785358) gene polymorphism cross interaction with gender of subjects is shown in Table 6. The results indicated that the genotype G/G frequency was noticed to be higher in male than female cases and controls (OR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.01–0.88 and OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.05–0.94, respectively).

    TGFBR2 (rs6785358) gene polymorphism cross interaction with gender of cases and controls (n = 175, crude analysis)

    TGFBR2 (rs6785358) genotypeFemaleMale
    CasesControlsOR (95% CI)CasesControlsOR (95% CI)
    A/A15261.0016200.72 (0.29–1.80)
    A/G14281.15 (0.47–2.85)16220.79 (0.32–1.96)
    G/G610.10 (0.01–0.88)830.22 (0.05–0.94)
    P-valueP = 0.0287*P = 0.1845
    Display full size

    *: P-value significant < 0.05

    The TGFBR2 (rs6785358) gene polymorphic genotypes among cases of different types of CHD compared to controls revealed that the G/G allelic frequency in the VSD cases was much higher in cases compared to controls (25.6% vs. 4.0%) with a significant statistical difference (P = 0.002, Table 7).

    TGFBR2 (rs6785358) gene polymorphic genotypes among cases of different types of CHD compared to control

    TGFBR2 (rs6785358) genotypeControlsVSDASDTOFTotal
    A/A46189477
    46.0%41.9%42.9%36.4%44.0%
    G/G4110318
    4.0%25.6%0.0%27.3%10.3%
    A/G501412480
    50.0%32.6%57.1%36.4%45.7%
    Fisher’s exact test – P-value19.690 – P = 0.002*
    Display full size

    *: P-value significant < 0.05

    The Hardy-Weinberg genetic equilibrium analysis for the TGFBR2 gene variant (rs764522) showed a negative equilibrium in both the studied subjects and control samples, with significant P-values of 0.0008 and 0.0001, respectively. This deviation is likely due to the very low frequency of the G/G genotype among the controls. However, in the cases group, a positive Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P = 0.11) was observed.

    Regarding another gene variant (rs6785358) within TGFBR2, the analysis revealed a positive equilibrium in both the studied patients and controls, with P-values greater than or equal to 0.05, indicating no significant deviation from the equilibrium.

    Regression modeling is a statistical method employed to examine the connections between variables. In the context of assessing the correlation between genetic markers and disease status, logistic regression is commonly used. The analysis involved evaluating the association of each SNP. In cases of binary responses, the outcomes of logistic regression analysis are succinctly presented in Table 8, encompassing significance levels, OR, and 95% CI. The findings indicate a noteworthy association between the GG genotype of rs6785358, as opposed to the CC genotype, and cardiovascular disease in children. Additionally, the CC genotype of rs764522 exhibited a significant association with the disease. Conversely, the variable of sex displayed a lack of significant association with the disease.

    Binary logistic regression between each SNP and the incidence of CHD

    VariableBChi-squareP-valueOR95% CI
    LowerUpper
    Sex0.4231.3320.2481.5260.7453.127
    rs6785358 (total)8.5280.014
    rs6785358 (AA)–0.0220.0030.9550.9790.4602.083
    rs6785358 (GG)1.8367.8020.0056.2721.72922.747
    rs764522 (total)4.9510.084
    rs764522 (CC)–0.9344.9510.0260.3930.1720.895
    rs764522 (GG)21.3420.0000.9980.000
    Constant–0.7183.2940.0700.488
    Display full size

    B: binary logistic regression coefficient. Blank cells represent “not detected”. rs6785358 (AG), rs764522 (CG) are used as reference for each related SNP

    Discussion

    A set of structural and functional deficiencies called CHD occurs during the development of the heart. Furthermore, CHD is the most common cause of child death which is linked to birth defects, and it accounts for one-third of all serious congenital malformations [20]. Since 2000, the prevalence of CHD has increased by more than 50% worldwide. There are notable geographic variances, with Asia reporting the greatest CHD birth frequency while Europe was much higher than North America [2123].

    The TGFB signalling pathway plays an important role in the generation of the heart. The signalling of TGF-β regulates a variety of biological roles, including cell growth, differentiation, matrix production, and apoptosis in a wide range of cell types [10, 24]. The lethal aortic and cardiac defects were reported due to the inactivation of TGFBR2 in smooth muscle cells and epicardium [25]. Moreover, the TGFB is required during in vivo cardiac development [26]. Numerous human congenital illnesses, such as Marfan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, neoplasms, aortic aneurysms and dissections, nonsegmental vitiligo, intracerebral hemorrhage, and sudden cardiac arrest in coronary artery disease patients are associated with genetic changes of the TGFBR2 gene [18, 19], which can be detected during the generation of the heart. Several studies propped up to determine the role of TGFBR2 in heart development based on mouse models of depleting TGFBR2 in special-cells. The endocardial depletion of TGFBR2 caused defects in the ventricular septal and double-inlet left ventricle [26]. The conditional deletion of TGFBR2 gene in smooth muscle cell-specific protein-expressing mice cells caused death during the last third of gestation, heart defects such as hypoplasia of the compact zone of the myocardium, ventricular, and atrial abnormalities were noticed in about half of mice [26]. TGFBR2 was essential for the development of the heart’s endothelial cells, and when its expression was inhibited, the ventricular septum was not properly formed [11]. The substantial reduction in transcriptional activities and loss of TGFBR2 gene expression may result in promoter mutation [27].

    In the present study, it is revealed that the G/G genotype frequencies of TGFBR2 (rs764522) were much higher among cases compared to controls (21.3% vs. 0.0%, respectively). This might imply that this genotype could be a predisposing factor to the occurrence of CHD. Moreover, a positive significance within the codominant and dominant model (P ≤ 0.001) was evidenced. Our results were consistent with the previous study on TGFBR2 (rs6785358) which revealed a significant association between the carrier of the A/G + G/G genotype and the risk of congenital heart defects compared to A/A genotype in the Chinese population [13]. Similarly, in Han Chinese population, the study of Li et al. [28] proved the association of TGFBR2 (rs6785358) SNP, A/G + G/G variant, with the susceptibility to congenital ventricular septal heart defects. An increased risk of CHD in males was noticed among G allele-carrying individuals (A/G + G/G genotypes, rs6785358) but not in females [13]. Moreover, the allelic variants in rs6785358 were significantly different between the male and female subgroups in cases and controls [28]. In the current study, the cross interaction with gender revealed that the C/G frequency (rs764522) was lower in male than female cases and controls. However, the genotype G/G frequency (rs6785358) was noticed to be higher in male than female cases and controls. Previously, gender variation was confirmed to be significant in specific CHD subgroups [29]. Hormone modulation controls the activation of the TGF-signalling pathway [30], and this may help to explain why sex influences the relationship between the TGFBR2 gene and the risk of congenital cardiac abnormalities. Additionally, mutations in sex and autosomal chromosomes may have an impact on the risk for CHD [31]. We should draw attention to the possible limitations in the present study, including its small sample size and pilot-study design among just two tagSNPs in the TGFBR2 gene. In order to determine whether tagSNPs or functional SNPs covering the TGFBR2 gene possess any mutations that are sensitive to congenital cardiac abnormalities in Egyptian patients, we advise doing further, larger, and multicenter investigations with more inclusion of other CHD medical manifestations.

    Conclusions

    This study showed that SNP rs6785358 and rs764522 of TGFBR2 gene were associated with an elevated risk of CHD in the Egyptian population. In the future, the results offer an opportunity for the development of a novel early genetic detection of CHD risk.

    Abbreviations

    ASD:

    atrial septal defect

    AST:

    aspartate transaminase

    CHD:

    congenital heart defects

    CI:

    confidence interval

    OR:

    odds ratio

    PCR:

    polymerase chain reaction

    SMAD2:

    mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2

    SNPs:

    single nucleotide polymorphisms

    tagSNPs:

    tag single nucleotide polymorphisms

    TGFBR2:

    transforming growth factor beta receptor II

    TGF-β:

    transforming growth factor beta

    TOF:

    tetralogy of Fallot

    VSD:

    ventricular septal defect

    Declarations

    Author contributions

    ND: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft. ESS and AAHE: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. FRA, IE, and RE: Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. All authors read and approved the submitted version.

    Conflicts of interest

    All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

    Ethical approval

    The Ethical Committee at the Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University approved the study (No. 11.2/2020 INTM2). The study is in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

    Consent to participate

    An informed consent was obtained from the parents of all participating subjects of this study.

    Consent to publication

    Not applicable.

    Availability of data and materials

    The datasets that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

    Funding

    Not applicable.

    Copyright

    © The Author(s) 2024.

    References

    Rahim F, Younas M, Gandapur AJ, Talat A. Pattern of congenital heart diseases in children at tertiary care center in Peshawar. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2003;19:1922.
    Brown KL, Ridout DA, Hoskote A, Verhulst L, Ricci M, Bull C. Delayed diagnosis of congenital heart disease worsens preoperative condition and outcome of surgery in neonates. Heart. 2006;92:1298302. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Peterson C, Dawson A, Grosse SD, Riehle-Colarusso T, Olney RS, Tanner JP, et al. Hospitalizations, costs, and mortality among infants with critical congenital heart disease: How important is timely detection? Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013;97:66472. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Rashid U, Qureshi AU, Hyder SN, Sadiq M. Pattern of congenital heart disease in a developing country tertiary care center: factors associated with delayed diagnosis. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2016;9:2105. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Sadiq M, Roshan B, Khan A, Latif F, Bashir I, Sheikh SA. Pattern of pediatric heart diseases in Pakistan. J Coll Physicians Surg Pakistan. 2002;12:14953.
    Diab NS, Barish S, Dong W, Zhao S, Allington G, Yu X, et al. Molecular genetics and complex inheritance of congenital heart disease. Genes (Basel). 2021;12:1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Pierpont ME, Brueckner M, Chung WK, Garg V, Lacro RV, McGuire AL, et al.; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine. Genetic basis for congenital heart disease: revisited: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;138:e653711. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Hart PJ, Deep S, Taylor AB, Shu Z, Hinck CS, Hinck AP. Crystal structure of the human TβR2 ectodomain–TGF-β3 complex. Nat Struct Biol. 2002;9:2038. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Takenoshita S, Hagiwara K, Nagashima M, Gemma A, Bennett WP, Harris CC. The genomic structure of the gene encoding the human transforming growth factor β type II receptor (TGF-β RII). Genomics. 1996;36:3414. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Arthur HM, Bamforth SD. TGFβ signaling and congenital heart disease: insights from mouse studies. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011;91:42334. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Robson A, Allinson KR, Anderson RH, Henderson DJ, Arthur HM. The TGFβ type II receptor plays a critical role in the endothelial cells during cardiac development. Dev Dyn. 2010;239:243542. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Markwald RR, Fitzharris TP, Manasek FJ. Structural development of endocardial cushions. Am J Anat. 1977;148:85119. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Huang F, Li L, Shen C, Wang H, Chen J, Chen W, et al. Association between TGFBR2 gene polymorphisms and congenital heart defects in Han Chinese population. Nutr Hosp. 2015;31:7105. [DOI] [PubMed]
    El-Nabi SH, Sayed S, Abd-Elhafez MA, Elfiky M, Abdel Moneim AE, El-Garawani I. Arg753Gln polymorphisms in the Toll-like receptor 2 gene are associated with cytomegalovirus infection in Egyptian bone marrow recipients. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2020;20:61924. [DOI] [PubMed]
    El-Garawani I, Hassab El-Nabi S, Gadallah M, Abdelsameea E. Association between IFN-λ 3 gene polymorphisms and outcome of treatment with direct acting antivirals in chronic HCV-infected Egyptian patients. Immunol Invest. 2021;50:1222. [DOI] [PubMed]
    El-Garawani IM, Shaheen EM, El-Seedi HR, Khalifa SMA, Mersal GAM, Emara MM, et al. Angiotensinogen gene missense polymorphisms (rs699 and rs4762): the association of end-stage renal failure risk with type 2 diabetes and hypertension in Egyptians. Genes (Basel). 2021;12:339. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Vesnina A, Prosekov A, Kozlova O, Atuchin V. Genes and eating preferences, their roles in personalized nutrition. Genes (Basel). 2020;11:357. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Mizuguchi T, Collod-Beroud G, Akiyama T, Abifadel M, Harada N, Morisaki T, et al. Heterozygous TGFBR2 mutations in Marfan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2004;36:85560. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Tseng ZH, Vittinghoff E, Musone SL, Lin F, Whiteman D, Pawlikowska L, et al. Association of TGFBR2 polymorphism with risk of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with coronary artery disease. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:174550. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Greutmann M, Tobler D. Changing epidemiology and mortality in adult congenital heart disease: looking into the future. Future Cardiol. 2012;8:1717. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Dolk H, Loane M, Garne E; European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT) Working Group. Congenital heart defects in Europe: prevalence and perinatal mortality, 2000 to 2005. Circulation. 2011;123:8419. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Hoffman JI. The global burden of congenital heart disease. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2013;24:1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095128. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Heldin CH, Miyazono K, ten Dijke P. TGF-β signalling from cell membrane to nucleus through SMAD proteins. Nature. 1997;390:46571. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Langlois D, Hneino M, Bouazza L, Parlakian A, Sasaki T, Bricca G, et al. Conditional inactivation of TGF-β type II receptor in smooth muscle cells and epicardium causes lethal aortic and cardiac defects. Transgenic Res. 2010;19:106982. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Jiao K, Langworthy M, Batts L, Brown CB, Moses HL, Baldwin HS. Tgfβ signaling is required for atrioventricular cushion mesenchyme remodeling during in vivo cardiac development. Development. 2006;133:458593. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1890900. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Li XT, Shen CQ, Zhang R, Shi JK, Li ZH, Liu HY, et al. Association of TGFBR2 rs6785358 polymorphism with increased risk of congenital ventricular septal defect in a Chinese population. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015;36:147682. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Pugnaloni F, Felici A, Corno AF, Marino B, Versacci P, Putotto C. Gender differences in congenital heart defects: a narrative review. Transl Pediatr. 2023;12:175364. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Buck MB, Knabbe C. TGF-beta signaling in breast cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1089:11926. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Rossouw JE. Hormones, genetic factors, and gender differences in cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;53:5507. [DOI] [PubMed]
    • Citation
      Cite this Article
      • Article Metrics
      • View: 799
      • Download: 18
      • Times Cited: 0