• Open Access
    Perspective

    Artificial intelligence ethics in precision oncology: balancing advancements in technology with patient privacy and autonomy

    Bahareh Farasati Far *

    Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2023;4:685–689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37349/etat.2023.00160

    Received: March 01, 2023 Accepted: July 10, 2023 Published: August 31, 2023

    Academic Editor: Alfonso Reginelli, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Italy

    This article belongs to the special issue Artificial Intelligence for Precision Oncology

    Abstract

    Precision oncology is a rapidly evolving field that uses advanced technologies to deliver personalized cancer care based on a patient’s unique genetic and clinical profile. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in precision oncology has shown great potential to improve diagnosis, treatment planning, and treatment outcomes. However, the integration of AI in precision oncology also raises important ethical considerations related to patient privacy, autonomy, and protection from bias. In this opinion paper, an overview is provided of previous studies that have explored the use of AI in precision oncology and the ethical considerations associated with this technology. The conclusions of these studies are compared, and the importance of approaching the use of AI in precision oncology with caution is emphasized. It is stressed that patient privacy, autonomy, and protection from bias should be made central to the development and use of AI in precision oncology. Clear guidelines and regulations must be established to ensure that AI is used ethically and for the benefit of patients. The use of AI in precision oncology has the potential to revolutionize cancer care, but it should be ensured that it striked a balance between advancements in technology and ethical considerations. In conclusion, the use of AI in precision oncology is a promising development that has the potential to improve cancer outcomes. However, ethical considerations related to patient privacy, autonomy, and protection from bias must be central to the development and use of AI in precision oncology.

    Keywords

    Artificial intelligence, precision oncology, ethics, patient privacy, patient autonomy, machine learning, personalized medicine, data protection

    Precision oncology is an exciting and rapidly evolving field that uses advanced technologies to deliver personalized cancer care based on a patient’s unique genetic and clinical profile [1]. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in precision oncology has shown great potential to improve diagnosis, treatment planning, and treatment outcomes. However, as with any new technology, there are important ethical considerations to be addressed [2]. The development of AI in precision oncology has been driven by the exponential growth in medical data and the need to extract meaningful insights from this data. AI algorithms can analyze large datasets of medical images, genomic data, and clinical data to identify patterns and correlations that may not be visible to the human eye [3]. These patterns can inform personalized treatment decisions and improve cancer outcomes. Despite the potential benefits of AI in precision oncology, there are also significant ethical concerns. These include issues around patient privacy, autonomy, and the potential for bias in AI algorithms. In this opinion paper, these ethical issues will be discussed and several ways to balance advancements in technology with patient privacy and autonomy are explored.

    The use of AI in precision oncology relies heavily on large datasets of medical information. There is a risk that this information could be accessed by unauthorized individuals or entities, leading to a breach of patient privacy. In addition, patients may be hesitant to share their personal information with healthcare providers if they believe their information may be shared without their consent [4]. It is essential that appropriate safeguards are put in place to protect patient privacy and ensure that their personal information is not misused or disclosed without their consent.

    Patients have a right to participate in decisions about their treatment and to be fully informed about the risks and benefits of different options. However, the use of AI in precision oncology may lead to decisions being made about a patient’s treatment without their input or consent [5]. This can lead to a loss of control over their own healthcare and a lack of trust in the healthcare system. It is important that AI is used in a way that respects patient autonomy and promotes shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers.

    AI algorithms are only as unbiased as the data they are trained on. There is a risk that AI algorithms may perpetuate biases or inequalities in healthcare by reflecting the biases of the data they are trained on [6]. For example, if a dataset is biased towards a particular demographic group, the AI algorithm may be less accurate in predicting outcomes for individuals from other demographic groups. It is important that AI algorithms are trained on diverse datasets and regularly audited to ensure that they do not perpetuate biases or inequalities [7].

    Several studies have explored the use of AI in precision oncology and the ethical considerations associated with this technology. A study by Topol [8] discussed the potential of AI to transform cancer care but also highlighted the need for safeguards to protect patient privacy and ensure that AI is used in a way that respects patient autonomy. Another study by Castaneda et al. [9] emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in the development and use of AI in precision oncology. They called for clear guidelines and regulations to ensure that AI is used ethically and for the benefit of patients. While both studies highlighted the need for ethical considerations in the use of AI in precision oncology, they differed in their emphasis [9]. Topol [8] focused on the potential benefits of AI in precision oncology, while Castaneda et al. [9] emphasized the need for clear guidelines and regulations to ensure that AI is used ethically. However, both studies agreed that the use of AI in precision oncology must be approached with caution and that patient privacy, autonomy, and protection from bias must be central to the development and use of AI in precision oncology.

    In fact, the use of AI in precision oncology is a promising development that has the potential to revolutionize cancer care. However, this technology must be approached with caution and ensure that patient privacy, autonomy, and protection from bias are central to its development and use. It is crucial that clear guidelines and regulations are established to ensure that AI is used ethically and for the benefit of patients. The use of AI in precision oncology has the potential to improve cancer outcomes, but it should be ensured that we strike a balance between advancements in technology and ethical considerations.

    In conclusion, the use of AI in precision oncology shows great potential in improving patient outcomes and advancing the field of oncology. However, it is essential to approach the use of AI in precision oncology with caution and address the ethical considerations associated with this technology. There is a need to improve the education process for both oncology medical personnel and patients to ensure that they are adequately informed about the benefits and limitations of AI in precision oncology. Some key findings from various studies on AI applications in precision oncology, as well as ethical considerations related to the use of AI in these applications, were summarized in Table 1. Further research is needed to optimize the use of AI in precision oncology while ensuring patient privacy, autonomy, and protection from bias [10].

    Overview of studies and ethical considerations related to AI applications in precision oncology

    StudyAI applicationKey findingsEthical considerationsReference
    Kelly et al. (2019)Patient outcomes predictionAI can predict patient outcomes such as hospital readmission and mortalityNeed for transparency in AI models and consideration of potential biases or discrimination[11]
    Bi et al. (2019)Patient monitoring and early detection of cancer recurrenceAI can improve the detection of cancer recurrence and enable early interventionNeed for regulation of AI in patient monitoring, protection of patient privacy and informed consent, and ethical considerations for patient autonomy and access to treatment[12]
    Dias and Torkamani (2019)Genetic testingAI can predict the risk of hereditary cancer based on genetic dataNeed for transparency in AI models and protection of genetic data privacy[13]
    Mudgal and Das (2020)Radiology imaging interpretationAI outperformed radiologists in detecting cancerNeed for oversight and regulation of AI in radiology to ensure patient safety and protection from bias[14]
    Schwendicke et al. (2020)Treatment planning and clinical decision-makingAI can improve treatment outcomes and reduce costsNeed for transparent and explainable AI models, protection of patient privacy, and consideration of ethical implications for patient autonomy[15]
    Reddy et al. (2020)Clinical trials and drug developmentAI can improve patient selection for clinical trials and accelerate drug developmentNeed for transparent and explainable AI models, protection of patient privacy and informed consent, and ethical considerations for equitable access to new treatments[16]
    Razzak et al. (2020)Early cancer diagnosisAI can detect cancer at an earlier stage than traditional methodsNeed for data privacy and security to protect patient information and prevent misuse of data[17]
    Carter et al. (2020)Risk prediction and screeningAI can improve the accuracy of breast cancer screening and risk predictionNeed for informed consent, privacy protection, and consideration of the potential harms of overdiagnosis[18]
    Huynh et al. (2020)Tumor segmentation and radiotherapy planningAI can improve the accuracy of tumor segmentation and radiotherapy planningNeed for clinical validation, transparency, and regulation to ensure patient safety[19]
    Hartl et al. (2021)Development of precision medicine treatmentsAI can identify novel drug targets and improve drug efficacyNeed for regulation of AI in drug development, protection of patient privacy and informed consent, and ethical considerations for drug pricing and access[20]
    Muller et al. (2021)Personalized treatment recommendationsAI can identify effective treatment options based on genetic and clinical dataNeed for informed consent and patient education to ensure understanding of AI-based recommendations[21]
    Delso et al. (2021)Clinical trial designAI can optimize clinical trial design and recruitmentNeed for ethical considerations such as consent, privacy protection, and potential biases[22]
    Ahmad et al. (2021)Pathology interpretationAI can assist in pathology interpretation and reduce errorsNeed for validation, transparency, and consideration of potential biases or errors[23]
    Alabi et al. (2021)Prognosis predictionAI can predict cancer prognosis and survival rates based on clinical and genomic dataNeed for ethical guidelines and regulations for the use of AI in prognostic applications[24]
    Luk et al. (2022)Predictive modeling for cancer diagnosis and risk stratificationAI can accurately predict cancer risk based on patient dataNeed for transparent and explainable AI models, protection of patient privacy, and ethical considerations for informed consent and non-discrimination[25]
    Display full size

    Abbreviations

    AI:

    artificial intelligence

    Declarations

    Author contributions

    BFF: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Supervision.

    Conflicts of interest

    The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Ethical approval

    Not applicable.

    Consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent to publication

    Not applicable.

    Availability of data and materials

    Not applicable.

    Funding

    Not applicable.

    Copyright

    © The Author(s) 2023.

    References

    Mateo J, Steuten L, Aftimos P, André F, Davies M, Garralda E, et al. Delivering precision oncology to patients with cancer. Nat Med. 2022;28:65865. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Chen ZH, Lin L, Wu CF, Li CF, Xu RH, Sun Y. Artificial intelligence for assisting cancer diagnosis and treatment in the era of precision medicine. Cancer Commun. 2021;41:110015. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Shaikh F, Dehmeshki J, Bisdas S, Roettger-Dupont D, Kubassova O, Aziz M, et al. Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support systems using advanced medical imaging and radiomics. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021;50:2627. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Jaremko JL, Azar M, Bromwich R, Lum A, Alicia Cheong LH, Gibert M, et al.; Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Artificial Intelligence Working Group. Canadian Association of Radiologists white paper on ethical and legal issues related to artificial intelligence in radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019;70:10718. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Aronson SJ, Rehm HL. Building the foundation for genomics in precision medicine. Nature. 2015;526:33642. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Fu R, Huang Y, Singh PV. Artificial intelligence and algorithmic bias: source, detection, mitigation, and implications. In: Pushing the boundaries: frontiers in impactful OR/OM research. USA: INFORMS; 2020. pp. 39–63. [DOI]
    Waldman CE, Hermel M, Hermel JA, Allinson F, Pintea MN, Bransky N, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: a primer for medical education in radiomics. Pers Med. 2022;19:44556. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25:4456. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Castaneda C, Nalley K, Mannion C, Bhattacharyya P, Blake P, Pecora A, et al. Clinical decision support systems for improving diagnostic accuracy and achieving precision medicine. J Clin Bioinforma. 2015;5:4. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Shreve JT, Khanani SA, Haddad TC. Artificial intelligence in oncology: current capabilities, future opportunities, and ethical considerations. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022;42:84251. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Kelly CJ, Karthikesalingam A, Suleyman M, Corrado G, King D. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. 2019;17:195. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Bi WL, Hosny A, Schabath MB, Giger ML, Birkbak NJ, Mehrtash A, et al. Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:12757. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Dias R, Torkamani A. Artificial intelligence in clinical and genomic diagnostics. Genome Med. 2019;11:70. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Mudgal KS, Das N. The ethical adoption of artificial intelligence in radiology. BJR Open. 2020;2:20190020. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Schwendicke F, Samek W, Krois J. Artificial intelligence in dentistry: chances and challenges. J Dent Res. 2020;99:76974. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Reddy S, Allan S, Coghlan S, Cooper P. A governance model for the application of AI in health care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27:4917. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Razzak MI, Imran M, Xu G. Big data analytics for preventive medicine. Neural Comput Appl. 2020;32:441751. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Carter SM, Rogers W, Win KT, Frazer H, Richards B, Houssami N. The ethical, legal and social implications of using artificial intelligence systems in breast cancer care. Breast. 2020;49:2532. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Huynh E, Hosny A, Guthier C, Bitterman DS, Petit SF, Haas-Kogan DA, et al. Artificial intelligence in radiation oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:77181. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Hartl D, de Luca V, Kostikova A, Laramie J, Kennedy S, Ferrero E, et al. Translational precision medicine: an industry perspective. J Transl Med. 2021;19:245. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Muller H, Mayrhofer MT, Van Veen EB, Holzinger A. The ten commandments of ethical medical AI. Computer. 2021;54:11923. [DOI]
    Delso G, Cirillo D, Kaggie JD, Valencia A, Metser U, Veit-Haibach P. How to design AI-driven clinical trials in nuclear medicine. Semin Nucl Med. 2021;51:1129. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Ahmad Z, Rahim S, Zubair M, Abdul-Ghafar J. Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, current applications and future role with special emphasis on its potential and promise in pathology: present and future impact, obstacles including costs and acceptance among pathologists, practical and philosophical considerations. A comprehensive review. Diagn Pathol. 2021;16:24. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Alabi RO, Youssef O, Pirinen M, Elmusrati M, Mäkitie AA, Leivo I, et al. Machine learning in oral squamous cell carcinoma: current status, clinical concerns and prospects for future—a systematic review. Artif Intell Med. 2021;115:102060. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Luk JW, Pruitt LD, Smolenski DJ, Tucker J, Workman DE, Belsher BE. From everyday life predictions to suicide prevention: clinical and ethical considerations in suicide predictive analytic tools. J Clin Psychol. 2022;78:13748. [DOI] [PubMed]