Despite innovative advances in molecular targeted therapy, treatment strategies using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not progressed significantly. Accumulating evidence suggests that ICI chemotherapy is inadequate in this population. Biomarkers of ICI therapy, such as programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), are not biomarkers in patients with EGFR mutations, and the specificity of the tumor microenvironment has been suggested as the reason for this. Combination therapy with PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors is a concern because of its severe toxicity and limited efficacy. However, early-stage NSCLC may differ from advanced-stage NSCLC. In this review, we comprehensively review the current evidence and summarize the potential of ICI therapy in patients with EGFR mutations after acquiring resistance to treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with no T790M mutation or whose disease has progressed on osimertinib.

Cancer is the primary cause of death worldwide, and conventional treatments are painful, complicated, and have negative effects on healthy cells. However, cancer immunotherapy has emerged as a promising alternative. Principle of cancer immunotherapy is the re-activation of T-cell to combat the tumor that presents the peptide antigen on major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Those peptide antigens are identified with the set of omics technology, proteomics, genomics, and bioinformatics, which referred to immunopeptidomics. Indeed, immunopeptidomics can identify the neoantigens that are very useful for cancer immunotherapies. This review explored the use of immunopeptidomics for various immunotherapies, i.e., peptide-based vaccines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viruses, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell. We also discussed how the diversity of neoantigens allows for the discovery of novel antigenic peptides while post-translationally modified peptides diversify the overall peptides binding to MHC or so-called MHC ligandome. The development of immunopeptidomics is keeping up-to-date and very active, particularly for clinical application. Immunopeptidomics is expected to be fast, accurate and reliable for the application for cancer immunotherapies.

Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a large B-cell neoplasm usually presenting as a serious effusion in body cavities without detectable tumor masses. It is an AIDS-related non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) with human herpes virus 8 (HHV8)/Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpes virus (KSHV) infection. A combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) prolongs the lifespan of AIDS and AIDS-related malignant lymphoma patients, but PEL continues to have a dismal prognosis. PEL showed disappointing outcomes with standard chemotherapy such as CHOP or CHOP-like regimens. A PEL status highlights the urgent need for new therapeutic approaches and treatment strategies and improve clinical outcomes. This review discusses the current knowledge and some recent clinical trials for PEL in the platform of immunotherapy as well as promising future immunotherapeutic approaches for PEL.

Cancer continues to be a global health concern, necessitating innovative solutions for treatment. Tri-specific killer engagers (TriKEs) have emerged as a promising class of immunotherapeutic agents, offering a multifaceted approach to cancer treatment. TriKEs simultaneously engage and activate natural killer (NK) cells while specifically targeting cancer cells, representing an outstanding advancement in immunotherapy. This review explores the generation and mechanisms of TriKEs, highlighting their advantages over other immunotherapies and discussing their potential impact on clinical trials and cancer treatment. TriKEs are composed of three distinct domains, primarily antibody-derived building blocks, linked together by short amino acid sequences. They incorporate critical elements, anti-cluster of differentiation 16 (CD16) and interleukin-15 (IL-15), which activate and enhance NK cell function, together with specific antibody to target each cancer. TriKEs exhibit remarkable potential in preclinical and early clinical studies across various cancer types, making them a versatile tool in cancer immunotherapy. Comparative analyses with other immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), cytokine therapies, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), reveal the unique advantages of TriKEs. They offer a safer pathway for immunotherapy by targeting cancer cells without hyperactivating T cells, reducing off-target effects and complications. The future of TriKEs involves addressing challenges related to dosing, tumor-associated antigen (TAA) expression, and NK cell suppression. Researchers are exploring innovative dosing strategies, enhancing specificity through tumor-specific antigens (TSAs), and combining TriKEs with other therapies for increased efficacy.

Cancer immunotherapy has emerged as a groundbreaking field, offering promising and transformative tools for oncological research and treatment. However, it faces several limitations, including variations in cancer types, dependence on the tumor microenvironments (TMEs), immune cell exhaustion, and adverse reactions. Magnetic nanoparticles, particularly magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs), with established pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics for clinical use, hold great promise in this context and are now being explored for therapeutic aims. Numerous preclinical studies have illustrated their efficacy in enhancing immunotherapy through various strategies, such as modulating leukocyte functions, creating favorable TMEs for cytotoxic T lymphocytes, combining with monoclonal antibodies, and stimulating the immune response via magnetic hyperthermia (MHT) treatment (Front Immunol. 2021;12:701485. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.701485). However, the current clinical trials of MNPs are mostly for diagnostic aims and as a tool for generating hyperthermia for tumor ablation. With concerns about the adverse effects of MNPs in the in vivo systems, clinical translation and clinical study of MNP-boosted immunotherapy remains limited. The lack of extensive clinical investigations poses a current barrier to patient application. Urgent efforts are needed to ascertain both the efficacy of MNP-enhanced immunotherapy and its safety profile in combination therapy. This article reviews the roles, potential, and challenges of using MNPs in advancing cancer immunotherapy. The application of MNPs in boosting immunotherapy, and its perspective role in research and development is also discussed.

Cancer is the leading cause of death globally superseded only by cardiovascular diseases, and novel strategies to overcome therapeutic resistance against existing cancer treatments are urgently required. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are immature myeloid cells with potent immunosuppressive capacity against well-established anti-tumour effectors such as natural killer cells (NK cells) and T cells thereby promoting cancer initiation and progression. Critically, MDSCs are readily identified in almost all tumour types and human cancer patients, and numerous studies in the past decade have recognised their role in contributing to therapeutic resistance against all four pillars of modern cancer treatment, namely surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy. MDSCs suppress anti-tumour immunity through a plethora of mechanisms including the well-characterised arginase 1 (Arg1), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated pathways, along with several other more recently discovered. MDSCs are largely absent in healthy homeostatic states and predominantly exist in pathological conditions, making them attractive therapeutic targets. However, the lack of specific markers identified for MDSCs to date greatly hindered therapeutic development, and currently there are no clinically approved drugs that specifically target MDSCs. Methods to deplete MDSCs clinically and inhibit their immunosuppressive function will be crucial in advancing cancer treatment and to overcome treatment resistance. This review provides a detailed overview of the current understandings behind the mechanisms of MDSC-mediated suppression of anti-tumour immunity, and discusses potential strategies to target MDSC immunosuppressive mechanisms to overcome therapeutic resistance.

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a therapy that combines a radioactive nucleotide with a monoclonal antibody (mAb). RIT enhances the therapeutic effect of mAb and reduces toxicity compared with conventional treatment. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current progress of RIT for treating non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) based on recent preclinical and clinical studies. The efficacy of RIT targeting the B-lymphocyte antigen cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20) has been demonstrated in clinical trials. Two radioimmunoconjugates targeting CD20, yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y)-ibritumomab-tiuxetan (Zevalin) and iodine-131 (¹³¹I)-tositumomab (Bexxar), have been approved in the USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating relapsed/refractory indolent or transformed NHL in 2002 and 2003, respectively. Although these two radioimmunoconjugates are effective and least toxic, they have not achieved popularity due to increasing access to novel therapies and the complexity of their delivery process. RIT is constantly evolving with the identification of novel targets and novel therapeutic strategies using newer radionuclides such as alpha-particle isotopes. Alpha-particles show very short path lengths and high linear energy transfer. These characteristics provide increased tumor cell-killing activities and reduced non-specific bystander responses on normal tissue. This review also discusses reviewed pre-targeted RIT (PRIT) and immuno-positron emission tomography (PET). PRIT potentially increases the dose of radionuclide delivered to tumors while toxicities to normal tissues are limited. Immuno-PET is a molecular imaging tracer that combines the high sensitivity of PET with the specific targeting capability of mAb. Immuno-PET strategies targeting CD20 and other antigens are currently being developed. The theragnostic approach by immuno-PET will be useful in monitoring the treatment response.

Immunotherapy treatments for cancer are known to cause adverse thyroid events which present a diagnostic challenge to clinicians and radiologists. This case report highlights the importance of a high clinical index of suspicion and careful assessment of the thyroid on serial imaging studies to make the diagnosis. The case involves a 65-year-old male with malignant melanoma who was started on immunotherapy as part of a clinical trial. He developed thyroid dysfunction followed by an attack of acute neck pain. Ultrasound of his thyroid was performed which showed significant atrophy. A review of previous imaging was undertaken which confirmed the patient had suffered from thyroiditis and subsequent atrophy. Following this, the diagnosis of immunotherapy-induced thyroid dysfunction was made. Thyroxine supplementation and steroid dose were then adjusted causing his thyroid function and symptoms to improve. Immunotherapy agents for cancers are becoming more and more common. As the case report shows, physicians and radiologists will need to be vigilant to diagnose and treat any adverse events.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are an effective drug for targeted immunotherapy in several cancer types. However, so far, no antibody has been successfully developed for certain types of cancer, including T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). T-ALL is an aggressive hematologic malignancy. T-ALL patients who are treated with chemotherapeutic drugs frequently relapse and become drug resistant. Therefore, antibody-based therapy is promising for T-ALL treatment. To successfully develop an antibody-based therapy for T-ALL, antibodies that induce death in malignant T cells but not in nonmalignant T cells are required to avoid the induction of secondary T-cell immunodeficiency. In this review, CD99 tumor associated antigen, which is highly expressed on malignant T cells and lowly expressed on nonmalignant T cells, is proposed to be a potential target for antibody therapy of T-ALL. Since certain clones of anti-CD99 mAbs induce apoptosis only in malignant T cells, these anti-CD99 mAbs might be a promising antibody drug for the treatment of T-ALL with high efficiency and low adverse effects. Moreover, over the past 25 years, many clones of anti-CD99 mAbs have been studied for their direct effects on T-ALL. These outcomes are gathered here.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive type of adenocarcinoma distinguished by its invasiveness. Depending on specific anatomical positioning within the biliary tree, CCA can be categorized into intrahepatic CCA (ICCA), perihilar CCA (pCCA) and distal CCA (dCCA). In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the global prevalence of CCA. Unfortunately, many CCA patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, which makes surgical resection impossible. Although systemic chemotherapy is frequently used as the primary treatment for advanced or recurrent CCA, its effectiveness is relatively low. Therefore, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising avenue for advancing cancer treatment research. CCA exhibits a complex immune environment within the stromal tumor microenvironment (TME), comprising a multifaceted immune landscape and a tumor-reactive stroma. A deeper understanding of this complex TME is indispensable for identifying potential therapeutic targets. Thus, targeting tumor immune microenvironment holds promise as an effective therapeutic strategy.

On Feb 2, 2022, Nature published the paper titled “Decade-long leukemia remissions with the persistence of CD4+ CAR T-cells” (Nature. 2022;602:503–9. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04390-6). According to the results presented, it could be argued that “chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells can actually cure patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)”. CAR T-cells remained detectable more than ten years after infusion, and immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) rearrangement deep sequencing showed persistent deep molecular remission for both patients (no CLL clonotypes were detectable six months after CAR T-cell infusion and onwards). However, the existing actual disease status of both patients remained unclear, as it was unknown: (1) if CAR T-cells killed all leukemia cells during the initial anti-leukemic response phase, that is, soon after CAR T-cell infusion into both patients; (2) if few CLL cells survived, but persistent CAR T-cells had been able to destroy any leukemia cells before they reach detectable levels. In the first case, both patients could be considered definitely cured; in the second not and their decade-prolonged deep remission could be a consequence of the cytotoxic activity of the functionally active CD4+ CAR T-cells. The first version appears to be stronger and the supporting arguments have been included in a comprehensive commentary article. A new therapeutic intervention may emerge with the potential to fully improve the quality of life of both patients and in addition, ongoing research into CAR T-cells may turn in a new, more effective direction.